chrisp65 Posted November 29, 2013 Share Posted November 29, 2013 That proves nothing. It's a bonnet. I'm not even sure it's a bear. Misinformation everyfkingwhere you look on the internet. I'm beginning to doubt some of the stuff I read on the net. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrackpotForeigner Posted November 29, 2013 Share Posted November 29, 2013 Then again... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mjmooney Posted November 29, 2013 VT Supporter Share Posted November 29, 2013 Correct. It's not a bear. Any more than a meercat is a cat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morpheus Posted November 29, 2013 Share Posted November 29, 2013 Courtesy of Uncyclopedia According to that photo the pope has taken a regeneration backwards while taking a dump. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post AVFCforever1991 Posted November 29, 2013 Popular Post Share Posted November 29, 2013 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrackpotForeigner Posted November 29, 2013 Share Posted November 29, 2013 Courtesy of Uncyclopedia According to that photo the pope has taken a regeneration backwards while taking a dump. And that is clearly no "woods". All this photograph proves is that one dead ex-pope once took a dump in the Aussie bush. Still a lot of work to do before we can be certain. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CarewsEyebrowDesigner Posted November 29, 2013 Share Posted November 29, 2013 We should tax every tweet a celebrity makes. That'll stop 'em. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jadenb42 Posted November 29, 2013 Share Posted November 29, 2013 People who constantly don't put the milk back in the fridge. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
legov Posted November 29, 2013 Share Posted November 29, 2013 Makes you almost wish for nuclear war. Funny thing is, half the knobs won't even see it coming because they'll be reading about Kim Kardashian's post baby weight loss instead. There's got to be some evolutionary reason for this propensity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CarewsEyebrowDesigner Posted November 29, 2013 Share Posted November 29, 2013 It's called 'burying your head in the sand'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wainy316 Posted November 29, 2013 Share Posted November 29, 2013 Makes you almost wish for nuclear war. Funny thing is, half the knobs won't even see it coming because they'll be reading about Kim Kardashian's post baby weight loss instead. There's got to be some evolutionary reason for this propensity. Stupidity? It will prove our undoing much before we can evolve out of it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dont_do_it_doug. Posted November 29, 2013 Share Posted November 29, 2013 It's not stupidity it's escapism. The revolution is coming. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
villa4europe Posted November 29, 2013 Share Posted November 29, 2013 black Friday in the uk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zatman Posted November 29, 2013 Share Posted November 29, 2013 Anchorman 2 hype. Dont care for the 1st one as it was shit but the hype about this new film you would think it was a sequel to an all time classic Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stevo985 Posted November 29, 2013 VT Supporter Share Posted November 29, 2013 Anchorman 2 hype. Dont care for the 1st one as it was shit but the hype about this new film you would think it was a sequel to an all time classic Sorry, but despite you not liking it, I'd say Anchorman most certainly is a classic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BOF Posted November 29, 2013 Moderator Share Posted November 29, 2013 I can definitely understand how it would get to someone who doesn't like the first one. They really are going all out with their marketing. Ron is everywhere doing all kinds of little news 'segments' to get exposure. But then I think it IS a sequel to an all time classic Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zatman Posted November 29, 2013 Share Posted November 29, 2013 then you guys piss me off as well 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AVFCforever1991 Posted November 29, 2013 Share Posted November 29, 2013 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CarewsEyebrowDesigner Posted November 29, 2013 Share Posted November 29, 2013 Give it 50 years and we'll see if it is a 'classic' or not. I doubt it will be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginko Posted November 29, 2013 Share Posted November 29, 2013 (edited) "Ninety-three?!?!" It's already achieved cult classic status in my opinion, certainly in our generation. Edited November 29, 2013 by Ginko Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts