Jump to content

U.S. Politics


maqroll

Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, nick76 said:

Nate Silver hasn’t been right since 2016 and consistently wrong on Biden, even his former site shows the opposite.

He's one of the better data journalists - him being wrong in 2016 always gets trotted out but his job isn't to be right, it's to show the likelihood of outcomes - and models can only be adjusted based on past learnings.

If every state was 66% Biden, 33% Trump, that's like saying you roll a dice 50 times and Trump wins the state if it's a 1 or a 2.  You'd expect Trump to win some states, even though his chances are lower (and Trumps odds of winning > 25 of states is still less than 1%).

The fact that presidential elections happen so infrequently means that when the unexpected outcome happens it's more shocking, but they can (and should) happen.

At the end of the day it's just a mix of science and assumptions to give people a number to help them deal with crippling uncertainty.  How many Villa fans look at the odds of us winning a math without ever placing a bet?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, Vancvillan said:

He's one of the better data journalists

That’s debatable, he was a great forecaster starting under the name of poblano pre 2008 election and again 2012 but then Trump changed the political landscape and his forecasting has been way off consistently because his models no longer work.  He’s very much known as a blowhard as well but his type of forecasting worked on traditional presidential and other elections but big data the way he does it hasn’t worked for the last 8 years and largely mocked within the industry now.  When Trump leaves the political stage will Nate’s models work or did he just have that period of 4 years his pinnacle where he was almost 100% spot on because he’s been off since and his views political and non-political have been questioned.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, bannedfromHandV said:

 

It’s mind blowing that it’s a straight choice between these two people, absolutely insane by any reasonable measure.

At least one of them is a democrat and not a roaring fascist who tried to overthrow an election result in January 2021.

Edited by Captain_Townsend
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, nick76 said:

That’s debatable, he was a great forecaster starting under the name of poblano pre 2008 election and again 2012 but then Trump changed the political landscape and his forecasting has been way off consistently because his models no longer work.  He’s very much known as a blowhard as well but his type of forecasting worked on traditional presidential and other elections but big data the way he does it hasn’t worked for the last 8 years and largely mocked within the industry now.  When Trump leaves the political stage will Nate’s models work or did he just have that period of 4 years his pinnacle where he was almost 100% spot on because he’s been off since and his views political and non-political have been questioned.

I mean my reply would be everything you took out of my post with your quote reply.

I think he's not a god, he's not an idiot either, but I've got no dog in this race.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, TheAuthority said:

Oh boy.

Trump is rambling and lying as usual but he looks the most coherent sadly.

This is an awful debate and you’re exactly right.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, TheAuthority said:

Biden scored some points with “you have the morals of an alley cat.”

He listed all of of Trumps crimes. That was good. 

All of this is so depressing.

Yep, I’m turning it off now, can’t stand watching any more it’s just depressing watching these two.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...
Â