smetrov Posted September 2, 2013 Share Posted September 2, 2013 Any truth in the rumours that there is a clause in the loan agreement that he MUST play against us ? 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BOF Posted September 2, 2013 Moderator Share Posted September 2, 2013 Any truth in the rumours that there is a clause in the loan agreement that he MUST play against us ?That's against Premier League rules so I seriously doubt it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nigel Posted September 2, 2013 VT Supporter Share Posted September 2, 2013 Any truth in the rumours that there is a clause in the loan agreement that he MUST play against us ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
P3te Posted September 2, 2013 Share Posted September 2, 2013 Any truth in the rumours that there is a clause in the loan agreement that he MUST play against us ? That's against Premier League rules so I seriously doubt it. I think it was a joke Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BOF Posted September 2, 2013 Moderator Share Posted September 2, 2013 Sorry I'm bouncing between facebook, twitter and the many tabs of VT while watching Sky. It's a media OD. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bickster Posted September 2, 2013 Moderator Share Posted September 2, 2013 Any truth in the rumours that there is a clause in the loan agreement that he MUST play against us ?That's against Premier League rules so I seriously doubt it.Which is a perfectly valid reason for this to be a loan not a sale, it means that one team we play against are forced to play a weakened side against us. Assuming of course that he'll be a first team regular 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brumstopdogs Posted September 2, 2013 Share Posted September 2, 2013 Good news that he is gone - thanks Sparky! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BOF Posted September 2, 2013 Moderator Share Posted September 2, 2013 Any truth in the rumours that there is a clause in the loan agreement that he MUST play against us ?That's against Premier League rules so I seriously doubt it. Which is a perfectly valid reason for this to be a loan not a sale, it means that one team we play against are forced to play a weakened side against us. Assuming of course that he'll be a first team regular And assuming that him being out of the side is a disadvantage. Maybe the other 18 sides have the advantage here Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndyBM Posted September 2, 2013 Share Posted September 2, 2013 ive forgotten my twitter password and the useless morons that run twitter havnt set i up right to get a new password, so im watching all this with 'one eye half closed' got SSN on and a dying laptop, argh! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Posted September 2, 2013 Share Posted September 2, 2013 Hope the exit door did not hit his backside on his way out of a club that I think he never really wanted to sign for. He now has a manager who thinks he still has something to offer and he will be nearer to the home he has kept since leaving Manchester so he has the opportunity to show he can still be the player he was for a short period at Citeh before his playing days are behind him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
momo Posted September 2, 2013 Share Posted September 2, 2013 Hope the exit door did not hit his backside on his way out of a club that I think he never really wanted to sign for. He now has a manager who thinks he still has something to offer and he will be nearer to the home he has kept since leaving Manchester so he has the opportunity to show he can still be the player he was for a short period at Citeh before his playing days are behind him. Player if the year, 2011-2012, Aston Villa. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bickster Posted September 2, 2013 Moderator Share Posted September 2, 2013 Hope the exit door did not hit his backside on his way out of a club that I think he never really wanted to sign for. He now has a manager who thinks he still has something to offer and he will be nearer to the home he has kept since leaving Manchester so he has the opportunity to show he can still be the player he was for a short period at Citeh before his playing days are behind him.Player if the year, 2011-2012, Aston Villa.Lets be honest though, that was a bit of a protest vote a sort of voting for UKIP type thing 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CVByrne Posted September 2, 2013 Share Posted September 2, 2013 How much of his wages will we still pay ? Any idea? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bickster Posted September 2, 2013 Moderator Share Posted September 2, 2013 How much of his wages will we still pay ? Any idea?Probably about half I reckon, just a guess however Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
momo Posted September 2, 2013 Share Posted September 2, 2013 Hope the exit door did not hit his backside on his way out of a club that I think he never really wanted to sign for. He now has a manager who thinks he still has something to offer and he will be nearer to the home he has kept since leaving Manchester so he has the opportunity to show he can still be the player he was for a short period at Citeh before his playing days are behind him. Player if the year, 2011-2012, Aston Villa. Lets be honest though, that was a bit of a protest vote a sort of voting for UKIP type thing We never hated Bent. Ireland was player of the year. Given was a great keeper. When Lambert came, we suddenly hated them. Just because of a few bucks... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
samjp26 Posted September 2, 2013 Share Posted September 2, 2013 Already opening his mouth about he's never been given a fair shot at Villa even though he's always been a professional. Yeah alright mate, yet we are still paying most of your wages? Let's just recall him and let him rot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Posted September 2, 2013 Share Posted September 2, 2013 (edited) "We never hated Bent. Ireland was player of the year. Given was a great keeper. When Lambert came, we suddenly hated them. Just because of a few bucks..." I do not think we had any hate for any of those 3 momo. Lambo chose Benteke and Guzan instead of Bent and Given and was proved right to do so. In the case of Ireland he cost us a lot of money, gave the appearance that he would have rather not been part of the deal that took Milner to Citeh and despite having had the odd decent game for us did not do enough to earn a starting place week in week out. A move suits club and player and gives him the opportunity to show he can be the player he once was again, I hope he takes this opportunity. Edited September 2, 2013 by John Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flamingsombrero Posted September 2, 2013 Share Posted September 2, 2013 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-nHNHIDduH4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daggy_333 Posted September 2, 2013 Share Posted September 2, 2013 Looks so good to see this thread marked as former player 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VILLAMARV Posted September 3, 2013 Share Posted September 3, 2013 thank god we didnt get sparky as manager WOO HOO !!!!!!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts