Jon Posted October 4, 2011 Share Posted October 4, 2011 Unsafe conviction from botched police investigation rightfully overturned. She may have done it, but the evidence was IMO insufficient for a safe conviction. She'll make a mint from this too, and if she is genuinely innocent, she'll deserve too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wiggyrichard Posted October 4, 2011 Share Posted October 4, 2011 How much compo do we think she can be looking forward to? £1m at least? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kidlewis Posted October 4, 2011 Share Posted October 4, 2011 i bet the first two words in her iphone search will be 'porn hub' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jon Posted October 4, 2011 Share Posted October 4, 2011 How much compo do we think she can be looking forward to? £1m at least? A lot of compo, plus probable newspaper deal, TV deal, book deal, film deal etc. She's set for life. I bet soliccito doesn't get as many offers! :winkold: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LondonLax Posted October 4, 2011 Share Posted October 4, 2011 How much compo do we think she can be looking forward to? £1m at least? No, she was found guilty of slandering her bar manager (she made up a story about him for being involved but turns out he had an alibi) and was given 3 years for it. Since she has been locked up for 4 years she only had an extra year on her sentance so she probably won't get so much money from the Italians. The American media however... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wiggyrichard Posted October 4, 2011 Share Posted October 4, 2011 i bet the first two words in her iphone search will be 'porn hub' Naa...Keez Movies is far superior! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kidlewis Posted October 4, 2011 Share Posted October 4, 2011 i bet the first two words in her iphone search will be 'porn hub' Naa...Keez Movies is far superior! xhamster for the trump card Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wiggyrichard Posted October 4, 2011 Share Posted October 4, 2011 i bet the first two words in her iphone search will be 'porn hub' Naa...Keez Movies is far superior! xhamster for the trump card Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jonno_2004 Posted October 4, 2011 Share Posted October 4, 2011 Innocent or not, everywhere she goes that has some type of connection to the Western media will be unsettling for her. Everyone will have an opinion on whether she did or not, imagine living the rest of your life knowing that every time someone meets you or sees you in the street there's a good chance they'd think of you as a murderer/accomplice to one. Then again with one of those places being America the majority would most likely be the 'USA 1 - 0 Italy' crowd. I guess for anyone who still thinks she's guilty or that things still don't add up one can always remember that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mjmooney Posted October 4, 2011 VT Supporter Share Posted October 4, 2011 Wonder who'll play her in the movie? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jonno_2004 Posted October 4, 2011 Share Posted October 4, 2011 Wonder who'll play her in the movie?Hayden Panettiere. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kurtsimonw Posted October 4, 2011 Share Posted October 4, 2011 I guess for anyone who still thinks she's guilty or that things still don't add up one can always remember that. I don't see how she could be guilty or how people could think it. I think that's why the Americans are so behind her on this. Surely a minimum requirement in a murder case is DNA proof - or any kind of proof, for that matter - that the defendant(s) were actually at the scene? Yet they could not prove that. The original trial just proves it was guilty until proven innocent. As for the Kercher family, I imagine Meredith would be ashamed of them. Her killer is behind bars and they're 'disappointed' and feel like they're 'back to square one' because they were unable to practically take the lives of 2 other young people for no reason or without proof? Hilarious they actually bought into the 'sex orgy gone wrong' idea. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JulieB Posted October 4, 2011 Share Posted October 4, 2011 Sky said Knox would automatically get Euros250K for wrongful imprisonment for murder IIRC she was found guilty of lying about the police slapping her about while in custody. THAT's what she got found guilty of and 3 yrs detention, which she'd already served. The slander against the barman was a civil case not criminal. In other Southern European countries the policing and justice system is an absolute joke, so I have no qualms with anyone questioning the police investigation, their methods and the evidence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RunRickyRun Posted October 4, 2011 Share Posted October 4, 2011 Unsafe conviction therefore rightly found not guilty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Genie Posted October 4, 2011 Share Posted October 4, 2011 Unsafe conviction therefore rightly found not guilty. Yep... but doesn't mean she didn't do it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Genie Posted October 4, 2011 Share Posted October 4, 2011 i bet the first two words in her iphone search will be 'porn hub' Naa...Keez Movies is far superior! Will have to check that out Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JulieB Posted October 4, 2011 Share Posted October 4, 2011 I don't see how she could be guilty or how people could think it. I think that's why the Americans are so behind her on this. Surely a minimum requirement in a murder case is DNA proof - or any kind of proof, for that matter - that the defendant(s) were actually at the scene? Yet they could not prove that. The original trial just proves it was guilty until proven innocent. Not to mention the prosecution not, from what I can see of it, providing any form of motive and then claiming they didn't need to. It's become trial by press and it's simply not right! Just like the weird teacher/landlord in that murder case a while back who got persecuted by the press and then was shown to have been innocent That Daily Mail article I saw on twitter last night... posted on here was an example of gutter press cheap journalism... it had reactionary quotes that were clearly fictitious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NurembergVillan Posted October 4, 2011 Moderator Share Posted October 4, 2011 Wonder who'll play her in the movie? Chuck Norris. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CarewsEyebrowDesigner Posted October 4, 2011 Share Posted October 4, 2011 The evidence was flimsy at best, so justice is done. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AshVilla Posted October 4, 2011 Share Posted October 4, 2011 like the father said something like 47 stab wounds and two knives were used unlikely to be one individual unless the guy was dual wielding Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts