Rodders Posted July 25, 2013 Share Posted July 25, 2013 (edited) http://storify.com/Eamonn_Forde/tony-blackburn-s-autobiography-compressed-for-stor this summary of alan part -- I'm sorry Tony Blackburn's autobiography. read it and not think of alan. I dare you. His comment on the miners in 1973 is my favourite I think, or his solution to racism. Just first class. Also "I don't know why we called him Simon." Edited July 25, 2013 by Rodders 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CarewsEyebrowDesigner Posted July 25, 2013 Share Posted July 25, 2013 (edited) 30 people who should have their dating priveleges revoked Edited July 25, 2013 by CarewsEyebrowDesigner Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonyh29 Posted July 27, 2013 Share Posted July 27, 2013 30 people who should have their dating priveleges revoked Is that Mickey Peirce in those pics or Michael Cera with a dodgy moustache 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xela Posted July 28, 2013 Share Posted July 28, 2013 http://storify.com/Eamonn_Forde/tony-blackburn-s-autobiography-compressed-for-stor this summary of alan part -- I'm sorry Tony Blackburn's autobiography. read it and not think of alan. I dare you. His comment on the miners in 1973 is my favourite I think, or his solution to racism. Just first class. Also "I don't know why we called him Simon." Absolutely brilliant Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chrisp65 Posted July 28, 2013 Share Posted July 28, 2013 outside in the warm and the rain Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xela Posted July 29, 2013 Share Posted July 29, 2013 Signed the mortgage papers for my new apartment earlier 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wainy316 Posted July 29, 2013 Share Posted July 29, 2013 Signed the mortgage papers for my new apartment earlier I did the same last week. (Not your apartment). 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leviramsey Posted July 30, 2013 VT Supporter Share Posted July 30, 2013 (edited) This bit of Perl (types changed to protect the innocent and not-so-innocent) use feature ':5.10'; my @cats; my @dogs; for (map { [ ref $_, $_ ]; } @things) { my $arr=undef; given ($_->[0]) { when ("Cat") { $arr=\@cats; } when ("Dog") { $arr=\@dogs; } } push @{$arr}, $_->[1] if defined $arr; } It's probably not as efficient as this my @cats; my @dogs; { my %arrs = ( Cat => \@cats, Dog => \@dogs, ); for (@items) { my $arr=$arrs{ref $_}; push @{$arr}, $_ if defined $arr; } } But that first form is just poetic, almost at the level of the Schwartzian Transform...(the first is probably more efficient if we're expecting to do a lot more things with Cats than with Dogs... and it leaves some room for future fanciness) Edited July 30, 2013 by leviramsey 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eames Posted July 30, 2013 Share Posted July 30, 2013 This bit of Perl (types changed to protect the innocent and not-so-innocent) use feature ':5.10'; my @cats; my @dogs; for (map { [ ref $_, $_ ]; } @things) { my $arr=undef; given ($_->[0]) { when ("Cat") { $arr=\@cats; } when ("Dog") { $arr=\@dogs; } } push @{$arr}, $_->[1]; } It's probably not as efficient as this my @cats; my @dogs; { my %arrs = ( Cat => \@cats, Dog => \@dogs, ); for (@items) { my $arr=$arrs{ref $_}; push @{$arr}, $_ if defined $arr; } } But that first form is just poetic, almost at the level of the Schwartzian Transform... (the first is probably more efficient if we're expecting to do a lot more things with Cats than with Dogs... and it leaves some room for future fanciness) I have absolutely no idea what this means Levi. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BOF Posted July 30, 2013 Moderator Share Posted July 30, 2013 Perl is great. It's a pity I don't get (need) to use it anymore. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stevo985 Posted July 30, 2013 VT Supporter Share Posted July 30, 2013 That just looks like the result of a monkey hammering on a keyboard. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leviramsey Posted July 30, 2013 VT Supporter Share Posted July 30, 2013 I can go through it line by line, if you'd like, but I'm trying to cut down on the long rambling posts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CarewsEyebrowDesigner Posted July 30, 2013 Share Posted July 30, 2013 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AVFCforever1991 Posted July 30, 2013 Share Posted July 30, 2013 That just looks like the result of a monkey hammering on a keyboard. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BOF Posted July 30, 2013 Moderator Share Posted July 30, 2013 That's one cruel charicature Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AVFCforever1991 Posted July 30, 2013 Share Posted July 30, 2013 Tbf to Bale he does look better nowadays since he's had his ears pinned back Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stevo985 Posted July 30, 2013 VT Supporter Share Posted July 30, 2013 (edited) That's a caricature? Edited July 30, 2013 by Stevo985 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CarewsEyebrowDesigner Posted July 30, 2013 Share Posted July 30, 2013 No 'h' in caraciture. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eames Posted July 30, 2013 Share Posted July 30, 2013 No 'h' in caraciture. A lack of h's cheers me up too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stevo985 Posted July 30, 2013 VT Supporter Share Posted July 30, 2013 No 'h' in caraciture. caricature Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts