LondonLax Posted August 14, 2013 Share Posted August 14, 2013 Maybe Strachan left him out because he thought the game was too fast and physical. Yeah better to save him for the slower, less intense games. A friendly with Andorra perhaps. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morpheus Posted August 14, 2013 Share Posted August 14, 2013 Or maybe Strachan after watching him a few times in training has realised why we're desperate to offload Bannan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NurembergVillan Posted August 14, 2013 Moderator Share Posted August 14, 2013 Maybe Strachan left him out because he thought the game was too fast and physical. Like the Premier League? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Con Posted August 14, 2013 Share Posted August 14, 2013 Maybe Strachan left him out because he thought the game was too fast and physical. Yeah better to save him for the slower, less intense games. A friendly with Andorra perhaps. Not my opinion. Maybe he didn't play Bannan because Bannan got a game against Croatia, so Strachan wanted to see as subs the other players in his squad (who were all injured last time out - the reason Bannan played against Croatia). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MessiWillSignForVilla Posted August 14, 2013 Share Posted August 14, 2013 Good point about Hutton. I disagree that Bannan has gone from a very effective season to "useless" just because he has not been played. Maybe Strachan left him out because he thought the game was too fast and physical. Define effective. I had almost as much effect on Villa's season last year and I can't even claim to be part of the "12th man" as I don't get down to games anymore due to Rugby/Uni. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Con Posted August 14, 2013 Share Posted August 14, 2013 Bannan's record: 18 starts, W 6 D 4 L 8 That's 33.3% win rate vs 10.5% win rate for the XI without Bannan starting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 14, 2013 Share Posted August 14, 2013 Bannan's record: 18 starts, W 6 D 4 L 8 That's 33.3% win rate vs 10.5% win rate for the XI without Bannan starting. And you have been told, 10 other players on the pitch. This % stat is meaningless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArteSuave Posted August 14, 2013 Share Posted August 14, 2013 You're confusing correlation and causation Con. One thing that Bannan (the "creative" midfielder) definitely did have control over was his goal and assist totals for the season. 0 and 1. Effective isn't the word I'd use. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LondonLax Posted August 14, 2013 Share Posted August 14, 2013 Yep. Correlation does not equal causation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
villa-revolution Posted August 14, 2013 Share Posted August 14, 2013 Con - This has to be your most disappointing & embarrassing night so far. You put all your eggs in one basket stating that Bannan was not only going to be picked tonight but was going to star in the match. Face it Con - You have ended up with egg on your face. No heat maps, no hoof charts, no .gifs, a big fat nothing, zilch. The tables are reversed Con. This time Bannan is taking the piss out of all of us but most of all you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rovers13 Posted August 14, 2013 Share Posted August 14, 2013 yet we dont know that. Why would any sane player want to go to Blackburn. am sure the Rovers fan here would agree its ran like a joke. if anything i applaud bannan sanity for not going Yep I can confirm that it is. And how is this thread still going? This is madness Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
villa-revolution Posted August 14, 2013 Share Posted August 14, 2013 (edited) yet we dont know that. Why would any sane player want to go to Blackburn. am sure the Rovers fan here would agree its ran like a joke. if anything i applaud bannan sanity for not going Yep I can confirm that it is. 13 And how is this thread still going? This is madness Is the madness in this thread as mad as the madness that poor old Rovers 13 is having to suffer under Venky's? Or is it just a case of the lunatics taking over the asylum? Only the insane choose to post on this thread I bet nobody anywhere on VT can find a post here that completely contradicts that statement Bannan & Con have driven us all completely Bonkers Edited August 14, 2013 by villa-revolution Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StefanAVFC Posted August 14, 2013 VT Supporter Share Posted August 14, 2013 Just watching the Weimann interview on AVTV. Him and Baz said they'd do Weimann's celebration when either of them score. So obviously it's just Andi's celebration Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeMcKenna Posted August 14, 2013 VT Supporter Share Posted August 14, 2013 FFS is he still here? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vandaq Posted August 15, 2013 Share Posted August 15, 2013 Honestly, as I have pointed out before none of this really makes any sense. I try to piece it together as someone is just doing trolling at a high level, meaning backing down was never going to happen. But it sure feels like it has been going on forever, same crap either way what gets said. Honestly, are you autistic or something Con? Would explain your determination on this subject, I mean you honestly seem so full of it. To be fair, you can take a lot of the credit for the hate bannan gets, that`s when taking up this subject got so popular and got a lot of people talking. At least on the internet, and I am sure that it has spread outside of that and gone to birmingham. Are you solely responsible? No, but you have done your part. For all your defending, you actually did more damage then anything. But it has been going on for so long, you would think that trolling couldn`t be it, but you have left some certain clues at thread, where you leave little comments, trying to wind people up. And I have seen a lot of this stuff but this really sets me out, I don`t get it, I really don`t. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stevo985 Posted August 15, 2013 VT Supporter Share Posted August 15, 2013 (edited) Maybe Strachan left him out because he thought the game was too fast and physical. Yeah better to save him for the slower, less intense games. A friendly with Andorra perhaps. Not my opinion. Maybe he didn't play Bannan because Bannan got a game against Croatia, so Strachan wanted to see as subs the other players in his squad (who were all injured last time out - the reason Bannan played against Croatia). Or maybe - and stay with me here Con because this is complicated, mind boggling stuff - just MAYBE Strachan didn't play Bannan because HE'S NOT GOOD ENOUGH Edited August 15, 2013 by Stevo985 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
villabromsgrove Posted August 15, 2013 Share Posted August 15, 2013 Bannan is a decent footballer with some good skills. The reason why he's no longer in the frame for Villa, is down to what he contributes when Villa haven't got the ball. Lambert's team tactics are all about pressing as a group to win the ball back asap when we lose the ball. Bannan's willing, but doesn't have the physical capability to win the ball back effectively. All this Bannan hating and Con bating is a bit childish imo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 15, 2013 Share Posted August 15, 2013 Bannan is a decent footballer with some good skills. The reason why he's no longer in the frame for Villa, is down to what he contributes when Villa haven't got the ball. Lambert's team tactics are all about pressing as a group to win the ball back asap when we lose the ball. Bannan's willing, but doesn't have the physical capability to win the ball back effectively. All this Bannan hating and Con bating is a bit childish imo. Bannan hating and Con bating? I'd suggest you read from the start. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
villabromsgrove Posted August 15, 2013 Share Posted August 15, 2013 394 pages!!!! What have I done to deserve that dodgyknees? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 15, 2013 Share Posted August 15, 2013 394 pages!!!! What have I done to deserve that dodgyknees? Because it is not as simple as people bating and hating (hey, I like that.) Con has spent months trolling and people are absolutely right to hit back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts