YLN Posted June 6, 2010 Share Posted June 6, 2010 How're you gonna get there yillan ....... National Express I didn't catch that link at all Feck it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jellybean_25 Posted June 6, 2010 Share Posted June 6, 2010 That site made me feel terrible. You know - after I was done... What do you mean? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jellybean_25 Posted June 6, 2010 Share Posted June 6, 2010 Still births are the befores and they are disfigured, then the person has photo shopped it to make it look more authentic. Just really **** up. Authentic? I think they were actually photoshopped to be less upsetting to look at. Badly worded. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kurtsimonw Posted June 6, 2010 Share Posted June 6, 2010 **** me this thunder is loud. I've got earphones in, listening to music, and I can hear it over the music. Scared me half to death! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chindie Posted June 6, 2010 VT Supporter Share Posted June 6, 2010 Apparently the standards of Religious 'Education' in our secondary schools isn't good enough. Good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jonno_2004 Posted June 6, 2010 Share Posted June 6, 2010 Still births are the befores and they are disfigured, then the person has photo shopped it to make it look more authentic. Just really **** up. I see. I've seen some f'd up stuff on the net but that has to be up there and that was just the home page. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jellybean_25 Posted June 6, 2010 Share Posted June 6, 2010 Theory test on Tuesday morning. None of this highway code is going in. Fail for sure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Milfner Posted June 6, 2010 Share Posted June 6, 2010 Still births are the befores and they are disfigured, then the person has photo shopped it to make it look more authentic. Just really **** up. Authentic? I think they were actually photoshopped to be less upsetting to look at. Badly worded. Yeah, so more authentic/real... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jellybean_25 Posted June 6, 2010 Share Posted June 6, 2010 Still births are the befores and they are disfigured, then the person has photo shopped it to make it look more authentic. Just really **** up. Authentic? I think they were actually photoshopped to be less upsetting to look at. Badly worded. Yeah, so more authentic/real... The babies are already real, So no. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CarewsEyebrowDesigner Posted June 6, 2010 Share Posted June 6, 2010 My mate announced last night that he has a fetish for ears, how peculiar is that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jon Posted June 6, 2010 Share Posted June 6, 2010 Just finding £60 in a never used pocket in a pair of jeans i rarely wear, FTW! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jon Posted June 6, 2010 Share Posted June 6, 2010 My mate announced last night that he has a fetish for ears, how peculiar is that? human ears? male or female? to eat, or to stick his tongue in? :winkold: Never been a ear fan myself. Much prefer feet/toes, on the fetish front. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jonno_2004 Posted June 6, 2010 Share Posted June 6, 2010 Still births are the befores and they are disfigured, then the person has photo shopped it to make it look more authentic. Just really **** up. Authentic? I think they were actually photoshopped to be less upsetting to look at. Badly worded. Yeah, so more authentic/real... The babies are already real, So no. Well certainly not what one would imagine a 'normal' baby to look like. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CarewsEyebrowDesigner Posted June 6, 2010 Share Posted June 6, 2010 Aye, I'm partial to some feet myself. Ears though...some girl walked by and he just said 'she has nice ears'. We stopped and put down our drinks, with a sense of dread upon us as we embarked into the murky world of sexual conversation, and I said simply 'Ears? Really?' to which he replied rather hastily 'Yes, to nibble and stuff'. And thus ended the conversation followed by a moments silence filled with distant stares into our drinks. Ears... Can't get my head round it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheWalletInspector Posted June 6, 2010 Share Posted June 6, 2010 Still births are the befores and they are disfigured, then the person has photo shopped it to make it look more authentic. Just really **** up. Authentic? I think they were actually photoshopped to be less upsetting to look at. Badly worded. Yeah, so more authentic/real... The babies are already real, So no. Well certainly not what one would imagine a 'normal' baby to look like. Does that make them any less real? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mjmooney Posted June 6, 2010 VT Supporter Share Posted June 6, 2010 What's the opposite of a fetish? 'Cos I have that for feet. Feet are horrible, even so-called "nice" feet. Ugh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leviramsey Posted June 6, 2010 VT Supporter Share Posted June 6, 2010 What's the opposite of a fetish? 'Cos I have that for feet. Feet are horrible, even so-called "nice" feet. Ugh. Which is why one must run in order to punish the feet for their sins, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jon Posted June 6, 2010 Share Posted June 6, 2010 What's the opposite of a fetish? 'Cos I have that for feet. Feet are horrible, even so-called "nice" feet. Ugh. Which is why one must run in order to punish the feet for their sins, right? I assumed he'd been put off by the stench after removing his trainers following one of his long runs .... :winkold: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mjmooney Posted June 6, 2010 VT Supporter Share Posted June 6, 2010 Funnily enough, my feet are not particularly smelly, according to my missus. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jonno_2004 Posted June 6, 2010 Share Posted June 6, 2010 Still births are the befores and they are disfigured, then the person has photo shopped it to make it look more authentic. Just really **** up. Authentic? I think they were actually photoshopped to be less upsetting to look at. Badly worded. Yeah, so more authentic/real... The babies are already real, So no. Well certainly not what one would imagine a 'normal' baby to look like. Does that make them any less real?No. I think I knew what Milfner meant though and I don't think it was meant to be controversial as to whether dead babies are real babies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts