Jump to content

The Film Thread


DeadlyDirk

Recommended Posts

 

Just saw World War Z. 

 

Jaysus, what a crappy excuse for a horror movie. No plot, no shocks, no tension. 

 

Hopeless. 

It's not a horror movie.

 

 

Well whatever it is, it's shite. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't be doing with all these uber-specialised genres. 

 

It's a zombie movie, I'd expect it to be at least a little bit scary, or tense, or something. 

 

Not for a moment. It's flat as a pancake. 

Edited by mjmooney
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What turned me off WWZ was that they completely changed it from the book in many ways - and not from the off. They kind of changed as they went along. So it sounds like a cluster****

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What turned me off WWZ was that they completely changed it from the book in many ways - and not from the off. They kind of changed as they went along. So it sounds like a cluster****

Forget about the book, it only shares the name.

It's ok. It's not a horror movie, it's an action film and it does a decent job at being that. I don't agree with Mike that it has to be scary, or even tense to be watchable. The plot holes are still too much for me get past to recommend it with any conviction, but yeah it's ok.

It's a Sunday afternoon flick. 6/10 leave your brain in bed type stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I genuinely quite enjoyed World War Z.

 

But I guess I didn't watch with any expectations of it and knew what it had set out to be. It was never meant to be your standard zombie movie, it was never meant to be a horror. They wanted to make a semi realistic/serious action movie against the backdrop of a zombie virus pandemic, which they did, with the book serving as a conceptual inspriation for the movie rather than a glorified script. It's not masterpiece but it's completely solid fun stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought Captain Phillips was very good indeed - thankfully Paul Greengrass directed it instead of Michael Bay, which meant for a more thought-provoking, muted film relying on good acting, instead of flag waving, Yankee celebrating claptrap with a bucket load of explosions and cheesy dialogue!

 

Although I'm not a massive Hanks fan, he was very very good indeed - portraying a man determined to keep it together whilst it's going off at Haydock around him. Only in the last couple of scenes you see how the ordeal is really affecting him.

 

Praise too to the Somali actors!

 

I'd recommend it, if not at the cinema, on DVD as I don't think the film will lose any of it's intensity on the smaller screen.

 

8/10 from me.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't be doing with all these uber-specialised genres. 

 

It's a zombie movie, I'd expect it to be at least a little bit scary, or tense, or something. 

 

Not for a moment. It's flat as a pancake. 

Do you think Shaun of the Dead is shit too? That's certainly not scary.

Edited by kurtsimonw
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I can't be doing with all these uber-specialised genres. 

 

It's a zombie movie, I'd expect it to be at least a little bit scary, or tense, or something. 

 

Not for a moment. It's flat as a pancake. 

Do you think Shaun of the Dead is shit too? That's certainly not scary.

 

 

Oh, so World War Z is supposed to be a comedy? Well it wasn't funny, either.

 

Haven't seen Shaun, BTW, and not planning to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

I can't be doing with all these uber-specialised genres. 

 

It's a zombie movie, I'd expect it to be at least a little bit scary, or tense, or something. 

 

Not for a moment. It's flat as a pancake. 

Do you think Shaun of the Dead is shit too? That's certainly not scary.

 

 

Oh, so World War Z is supposed to be a comedy? Well it wasn't funny, either.

 

Haven't seen Shaun, BTW, and not planning to.

 

You just said it was a zombie movie so you'd expect it to be a bit scary. By that logic you'd expect Shaun of the Dead to be scary, it's not. WWZ is not a horror or a comedy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

I can't be doing with all these uber-specialised genres. 

 

It's a zombie movie, I'd expect it to be at least a little bit scary, or tense, or something. 

 

Not for a moment. It's flat as a pancake. 

Do you think Shaun of the Dead is shit too? That's certainly not scary.

 

 

Oh, so World War Z is supposed to be a comedy? Well it wasn't funny, either.

 

Haven't seen Shaun, BTW, and not planning to.

 

You're not missing anything...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

 

I can't be doing with all these uber-specialised genres. 

 

It's a zombie movie, I'd expect it to be at least a little bit scary, or tense, or something. 

 

Not for a moment. It's flat as a pancake. 

Do you think Shaun of the Dead is shit too? That's certainly not scary.

 

 

Oh, so World War Z is supposed to be a comedy? Well it wasn't funny, either.

 

Haven't seen Shaun, BTW, and not planning to.

 

You just said it was a zombie movie so you'd expect it to be a bit scary. By that logic you'd expect Shaun of the Dead to be scary, it's not. WWZ is not a horror or a comedy.

 

 

I've already said - whatever it IS supposed to be, it fails.

 

"The Happening" was a bit of a let-down, but it was still a better 'epidemic' movie than WWZ.

 

"I Am Legend" had some major faults, but it was still a better Zombie movie than WWZ.

 

"28 Days Later" - now THAT was a Zombie movie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...

exclamation-mark-man-user-icon-with-png-and-vector-format-227727.png

Ad Blocker Detected

This site is paid for by ad revenue, please disable your ad blocking software for the site.

Â