Jump to content

Lewis Dobbin


Pongo Waring

Recommended Posts

Bit of missed opportunity since Weston McKennie is apparently a huge Harry Potter fan. Think what fun we could have had with him presenting the kit to Dobbin and what not. Would have been wizard.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, LondonLax said:

This is a good explanation. It also highlights the obvious problem in that next season (and every season for the next 5 years) we start the season with a £2m loss from this player but we long ago spent the original £10m that we brought in.

So this ‘clever accounting’ player goes from being an £8m boon on our books to a £2m ball and chain for every future season. 

Then we add the other ball and chain ‘clever accounting’ swaps we’re lining up and suddenly we have crippled ourselves for future transfer windows. 

The amortisation FFP trick is really just a form of ‘kicking the can down the road’ and hoping we can increase revenue before the music stops. 

edit. Changed my mind, now agree with you. 

Edited by cheltenham_villa
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, LondonLax said:

This is a good explanation. It also highlights the obvious problem in that next season (and every season for the next 5 years) we start the season with a £2m loss from this player but we long ago spent the original £10m that we brought in.

So this ‘clever accounting’ player goes from being an £8m boon on our books to a £2m ball and chain for every future season. 

Then we add the other ball and chain ‘clever accounting’ swaps we’re lining up and suddenly we have crippled ourselves for future transfer windows. 

The amortisation FFP trick is really just a form of ‘kicking the can down the road’ and hoping we can increase revenue before the music stops. 

 

38 minutes ago, tezzaleed said:

yes but we have the asset.  so the trick is to buy players that you can resell.  that way you should be able to sell one of those players each year and cover the 2m x 5 players by selling one of them each year.

 

The £2m ball and chain is exactly why Heck is tasked with growing revenues to £400m pa. If revenues remained static, these tactics would eventually result in a stagnant squad other than what @tezzaleed notes here.

Others have said it, but these swaps will only happen when both teams are willing to let a player go and want to earn some value on the books, to satisfy PSR. It's clever, but I don't think it helps football especially well, mostly because the lower levels of the pyramid will have less access to the talents that would traditionally drop out of the top league. I can see it being flagged as anti-competitive in time, but I also suspect that will be the same moment that PSR is ripped up too.

Edited by Tubby
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, LondonLax said:

This is a good explanation. It also highlights the obvious problem in that next season (and every season for the next 5 years) we start the season with a £2m loss from this player but we long ago spent the original £10m that we brought in.

So this ‘clever accounting’ player goes from being an £8m boon on our books to a £2m ball and chain for every future season. 

Then we add the other ball and chain ‘clever accounting’ swaps we’re lining up and suddenly we have crippled ourselves for future transfer windows. 

The amortisation FFP trick is really just a form of ‘kicking the can down the road’ and hoping we can increase revenue before the music stops. 

Heck and Co must be confident that our revenue is growing to the point this won't be an issue for a long time.  And as the team get's better under Emery we will see player sales as some of the first teamers are replaced with better players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, CarryOnVilla said:

This is happening. No rumour 

 

20 minutes ago, rodders0223 said:

This is not happening. Just a rumour.

Great thanks guys 🤣🤣

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Demitri_C said:

Seems a random one this one.  Another wide player

I doubt he'll be anywhere near our team tbh, this has got all the hallmarks of us and Everton simply giving each other an FFP reacharound.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Davkaus said:

I doubt he'll be anywhere near our team tbh, this has got all the hallmarks of us and Everton simply giving each other an FFP reacharound.

Lovvveeee a good reach around 🤤

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

rather than Timmy for 9m and Dobbin for 9m, why cant we just do:

Timmy - 10m, Archer - 20m, Hayden - 10m, Chambers & Hause - BTGTF (buy three, get two free)    = 40m

Onana - 40m.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, LondonLax said:

This is a good explanation. It also highlights the obvious problem in that next season (and every season for the next 5 years) we start the season with a £2m loss from this player but we long ago spent the original £10m that we brought in.

So this ‘clever accounting’ player goes from being an £8m boon on our books to a £2m ball and chain for every future season. 

Then we add the other ball and chain ‘clever accounting’ swaps we’re lining up and suddenly we have crippled ourselves for future transfer windows. 

The amortisation FFP trick is really just a form of ‘kicking the can down the road’ and hoping we can increase revenue before the music stops. 

 

 

just standard business accounting of intangible assets. it's a matter of perception - Dougie was a ball and chain until he becomes £45million profit

 

 

7 hours ago, Vancvillan said:

It's a ponzi for sure, but one that could go on for a very long time before it's an issue.

 

all of capitalism is a ponzi 

image.thumb.jpeg.0ff3278472a84060be181536596090f0.jpeg

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...

exclamation-mark-man-user-icon-with-png-and-vector-format-227727.png

Ad Blocker Detected

This site is paid for by ad revenue, please disable your ad blocking software for the site.

Â