villa4europe Posted June 21 Share Posted June 21 Offside is properly broken if people think that's a goal, it's **** Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UpTheVilla26 Posted June 21 Share Posted June 21 That's a disgrace. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WallisFrizz Posted June 21 Share Posted June 21 1 minute ago, Zatman said: Looks a fair offside as keeper cant dive with Dumfries there Nah. It’s not like Maignon is trying to dive and can’t do it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zatman Posted June 21 Share Posted June 21 Just now, bobzy said: Of course he can - he makes absolutely no attempt. Should be a goal IMO. Dumfries is still there though. If he dives its straight into his knee and risks serious injury Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peterwithethewinner Posted June 21 Share Posted June 21 Stuart atwell again ffs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Demitri_C Posted June 21 Share Posted June 21 1 minute ago, Zatman said: Looks a fair offside as keeper cant dive with Dumfries there Keeper didnt even dive for it. If he did and he hits the player than then that would highlight the point. He didnt obstruct or block his view 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MachoFantastico Posted June 21 Share Posted June 21 I'm speechless, why was that disallowed? I don't get that at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobzy Posted June 21 Share Posted June 21 Just now, villa4europe said: How is he possibly not interfering? I guess it depends what your interpretation of "interfering" is. He's stood to the side of a goalkeeper who cannot make the dive quickly enough to get to a ball that is fired into the corner. The goalkeeper doesn't attempt to dive - he isn't blocked by the attacker or in any way impeded. So, for me, the attacker isn't blocking the goalkeeper, isn't blocking the goalkeeper's sight and has no impact on the ball going into the corner. If "interfering" just means standing close by, then sure. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PieFacE Posted June 21 VT Supporter Share Posted June 21 I do find it funny that the only VAR controversy so far has been at the hands of PL refs 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
turnbull Posted June 21 Share Posted June 21 Fix Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zatman Posted June 21 Share Posted June 21 Just now, Demitri_C said: Keeper didnt even dive for it. If he did and he hits the player than then that would highlight the point. He didnt obstruct or block his view And potentially injure himself Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TDR V2 Posted June 21 Share Posted June 21 Lol so the longest wrong decision is presided over by our useless English refs and VAR team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobzy Posted June 21 Share Posted June 21 Just now, Zatman said: Dumfries is still there though. If he dives its straight into his knee and risks serious injury **** off Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
villa4europe Posted June 21 Share Posted June 21 Just now, Zatman said: Dumfries is still there though. If he dives its straight into his knee and risks serious injury Or he doesn't dive because he can see a guy stood offside a yard away from him Impacts his decision making I'm genuinely gob smacked people think that's not offside 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
villa4europe Posted June 21 Share Posted June 21 Just now, bobzy said: I guess it depends what your interpretation of "interfering" is. He's stood to the side of a goalkeeper who cannot make the dive quickly enough to get to a ball that is fired into the corner. The goalkeeper doesn't attempt to dive - he isn't blocked by the attacker or in any way impeded. So, for me, the attacker isn't blocking the goalkeeper, isn't blocking the goalkeeper's sight and has no impact on the ball going into the corner. If "interfering" just means standing close by, then sure. Interfering means impacting his decision making It's literally impossible to be stood there and not impact the keeper Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zatman Posted June 21 Share Posted June 21 Just now, villa4europe said: Or he doesn't dive because he can see a guy stood offside a yard away from him Impacts his decision making I'm genuinely gob smacked people think that's not offside Its bizarre to me They wouldnt be saying same if Emi conceded that goal 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Django_Zooms Posted June 21 Share Posted June 21 The keeper made absolutely no attempt to dive, so he was not impeded. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CarryOnVilla Posted June 21 Share Posted June 21 If the Keeper attempted to dive and was obstructed, then yes offside. but he didn’t and just watched it go in… so it’s onside in my opinion 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Herman22 Posted June 21 Share Posted June 21 The premier league refs are so shit! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StefanAVFC Posted June 21 VT Supporter Share Posted June 21 Defender blocks the view not Dumfries Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts