Genie Posted July 10, 2023 Share Posted July 10, 2023 Just need an MP to use his parliamentary privilege to mention the name now so everyone can move on from the guessing game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobzy Posted July 10, 2023 Share Posted July 10, 2023 (edited) 13 minutes ago, Rodders said: ah damn, admittedly, only going off a google search and clicking on a reddit page , but the guy rumoured to be it? Damn. Yeah, damn. Edited July 10, 2023 by bobzy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HongKongVillan Posted July 10, 2023 VT Supporter Share Posted July 10, 2023 well if thats true this could really go to that "fallen angel" category Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rodders0223 Posted July 10, 2023 Share Posted July 10, 2023 Help a brother out with a DM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mjmooney Posted July 10, 2023 VT Supporter Share Posted July 10, 2023 3 minutes ago, rodders0223 said: Help a brother out with a DM Here's a clue: He's married with five children, and is a devout Christian and weekly churchgoer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deano & Dalian's Umbrella Posted July 10, 2023 Share Posted July 10, 2023 On 09/07/2023 at 08:42, StefanAVFC said: Can be married at 16 legally with parental consent so you can be arrested for filming having legal sex with your wife There was a case in America where this actually happened about 10 years ago. The guy's wife was 16 and he was 18 and he got done for having nude photos of her which were classified as indecent images of a child. I just tried to find it with a google news search but there have been so many sex offender news articles since then it's like looking for a needle in a haystack. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ender4 Posted July 10, 2023 Share Posted July 10, 2023 1 minute ago, Deano & Dalian's Umbrella said: There was a case in America where this actually happened about 10 years ago. The guy's wife was 16 and he was 18 and he got done for having nude photos of her which were classified as indecent images of a child. I just tried to find it with a google news search but there have been so many sex offender news articles since then it's like looking for a needle in a haystack. and now your google search history is looking for nude photos of a guy's 16 year old wife 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deano & Dalian's Umbrella Posted July 10, 2023 Share Posted July 10, 2023 (edited) 2 minutes ago, ender4 said: and now your google search history is looking for nude photos of a guy's 16 year old wife I already thought of that and did it in Private Mode! It's not something Hyou'd want everyone knowing about. Also, I did a news search rather than a plain google search to make sure nothing came up like that! Edited July 10, 2023 by Deano & Dalian's Umbrella Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Genie Posted July 10, 2023 Share Posted July 10, 2023 35 minutes ago, Deano & Dalian's Umbrella said: I already thought of that and did it in Private Mode! It's not something Hyou'd want everyone knowing about. Also, I did a news search rather than a plain google search to make sure nothing came up like that! Don’t worry, your ISP will grass you up to the feds. Private mode won’t protect you from that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deano & Dalian's Umbrella Posted July 10, 2023 Share Posted July 10, 2023 I only went into this thread to see if everyone else knew who it was and had seen the arse photo! I do know private modes don't hide your IP address and you need a VPN for that! Got to go, the police have just knocked at my door. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deano & Dalian's Umbrella Posted July 10, 2023 Share Posted July 10, 2023 23 hours ago, Genie said: Lots of people on Twitter speculating on Huw is could be. This reminded me of this Curb Your Enthusiasm episode. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jim Posted July 10, 2023 Share Posted July 10, 2023 The young persons lawyer has said the mothers account is nonsense and nothing In appropriate happened. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xela Posted July 10, 2023 Share Posted July 10, 2023 6 hours ago, Genie said: With AI and photoshop that’s probably true for everything on the internet now. Fun times. Its a scary thought isn't it. There was a deepfake Martin Lewis video on social media recently where he was asking people to invest in something. Onto the presenter, ass-Huw-ming it is genuine*, why do people do stuff like that? Especially if you are famous. Never show your face on these photos. *good eh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Demitri_C Posted July 10, 2023 Share Posted July 10, 2023 Im fine everyone Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fruitvilla Posted July 10, 2023 Share Posted July 10, 2023 22 hours ago, mjmooney said: 22 hours ago, fruitvilla said: This might belong on the unpopular opinion thread ... but reading through the comments here ... we, in the West in particular, are infected/indoctrinated with post-Christian prudery when it comes to nudity and sexuality. Tell that to the Taliban and other Islamic regimes. Two things: 1) I'm not sure how we get from "post-Christian prudery when it comes to nudity and sexuality" to "Britain has a puritanical Christian mindset". 2) And how prudish Islam, the Taliban in particular, affects Britain's view on nudity. Whataboutery? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tomav84 Posted July 10, 2023 VT Supporter Share Posted July 10, 2023 14 minutes ago, jim said: The young persons lawyer has said the mothers account is nonsense and nothing In appropriate happened. It's worse than that. They told the sun this very fact on Friday but they printed the article anyway Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bickster Posted July 10, 2023 Moderator Share Posted July 10, 2023 And this is why the BBC not releasing the name was absolutely the right thing to do. There was something distinctly off about this from the outset. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Genie Posted July 10, 2023 Share Posted July 10, 2023 Just now, bickster said: And this is why the BBC not releasing the name was absolutely the right thing to do. There was something distinctly off about this from the outset. All it meant was that several other presenters were abused and everyone knows who the one in question is. It was a silly stance to take with someone in the public eye. The BBC could have said allegations have been made against x and he is suspended whilst we conduct an investigation. It would have made nobody’s life worse, but several peoples life better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deano & Dalian's Umbrella Posted July 10, 2023 Share Posted July 10, 2023 Somebody has posted the arse pic of the presenter as a reply on the presenter's own twitter page. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bickster Posted July 10, 2023 Moderator Share Posted July 10, 2023 1 minute ago, Genie said: All it meant was that several other presenters were abused and everyone knows who the one in question is. It was a silly stance to take with someone in the public eye. The BBC could have said allegations have been made against x and he is suspended whilst we conduct an investigation. It would have made nobody’s life worse, but several peoples life better. The law was changed after the BBC / Cliff Richard case. The BBC couldn’t name the presenter even if they wanted to The law was changed for a reason. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts