bickster Posted July 9, 2023 Moderator Share Posted July 9, 2023 4 minutes ago, Genie said: I’m not sure why the BBC bother trying to keep the name secret. It’ll be out within a couple of days after dozens of presenters have been falsely accused. Because it is absolutely the correct course of action. Legally and morally at this stage. They’d get sued for a huge figure if they were he ones to release the name Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chrisp65 Posted July 9, 2023 Share Posted July 9, 2023 I think on the balance of probabilities, pretty much any crime is more likely to have been committed by a male. That’s genuine actual crime, not just liking shit music or stopping in narrow shop doorways to stare in to your bag. I shall use as my evidence: the prison population including sex offenders. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mandy Lifeboats Posted July 9, 2023 Share Posted July 9, 2023 3 minutes ago, chrisp65 said: I think on the balance of probabilities, pretty much any crime is more likely to have been committed by a male. That’s genuine actual crime, not just liking shit music or stopping in narrow shop doorways to stare in to your bag. I shall use as my evidence: the prison population including sex offenders. 99% of sex offenders are male. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Genie Posted July 9, 2023 Share Posted July 9, 2023 8 minutes ago, Mandy Lifeboats said: 99% of sex offenders are male. Exactly, that’s why people assumed it would be a male in this instance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chrisp65 Posted July 9, 2023 Share Posted July 9, 2023 9 minutes ago, Mandy Lifeboats said: 99% of sex offenders are male. The latest stats I can find on a quick search are from the ONS / MoJ for 2017. Perps of sexual offences of all types in 2017: Male 10,974 Female 186 I’m sticking my money on it being a male. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Genie Posted July 9, 2023 Share Posted July 9, 2023 14 minutes ago, bickster said: Because it is absolutely the correct course of action. Legally and morally at this stage. They’d get sued for a huge figure if they were he ones to release the name Who would sue them? They’ve suspended someone so I’m not sure what they gain by not saying who it is when it’ll obviously be public knowledge very soon. The speculation will be very damaging to their other presenters. They could even say “An x year old presenter has been suspended whilst we conduct an investigation” like the police do when they arrest a footballer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post est1874 Posted July 9, 2023 Popular Post Share Posted July 9, 2023 30 minutes ago, bickster said: As you clearly didn’t see (just like I didn’t) that the BBC have confirmed it’s a male Why was it almost certainly a male? There are plenty of rich older women paying for dick pics these days There are ????! I mean. (coughs) Are there? 1 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bickster Posted July 9, 2023 Moderator Share Posted July 9, 2023 Just now, est1874 said: There are ????! I mean. (coughs) Are there? Yes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
est1874 Posted July 9, 2023 Share Posted July 9, 2023 Just now, bickster said: Yes. Will you pass along my email address? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Genie Posted July 9, 2023 Share Posted July 9, 2023 (edited) There was a famous male adult film actor on a podcast a while back and he said he had an onlyfans page that was making a lot of money. There was a bit of a surprise at that because they (the presenters) didn’t think there were that many women paying for cock-pics and he said it’s true, it’s mainly gay men that subscribe to his page. Edited July 9, 2023 by Genie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bickster Posted July 9, 2023 Moderator Share Posted July 9, 2023 10 minutes ago, Genie said: Who would sue them? They’ve suspended someone so I’m not sure what they gain by not saying who it is when it’ll obviously be public knowledge very soon. The speculation will be very damaging to their other presenters. They could even say “An x year old presenter has been suspended whilst we conduct an investigation” like the police do when they arrest a footballer. The person that they suspended. What happens if this is all a load of bollocks, which quite frankly, right now it is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Genie Posted July 9, 2023 Share Posted July 9, 2023 Just now, bickster said: The person that they suspended. What happens if this is all a load of bollocks, which quite frankly, right now it is. Then he’ll go back to work I assume. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loxstock92 Posted July 9, 2023 Share Posted July 9, 2023 2 minutes ago, Genie said: There was a famous male adult film actor on a podcast a while back and he said he had an onlyfans page that was making a lot of money. Their was a bit of a surprise at that because they (the presenters) didn’t think there were that many women paying for cock-pics and he said it’s true, it’s mainly gay men that subscribe to his page. Danny D on jaackmates pod? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bickster Posted July 9, 2023 Moderator Share Posted July 9, 2023 Just now, Genie said: Then he’ll go back to work I assume. It wouldn’t be an employment tribunal The BBC would be held responsible for he torrent of hate that would be directed towards said individual whose life would be changed permanently by the accusation The BBC would in all likelihood settle out of court for a massive sum. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Genie Posted July 9, 2023 Share Posted July 9, 2023 2 minutes ago, Loxstock92 said: Danny D on jaackmates pod? that’s the one, I couldn’t remember which podcast it was. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Genie Posted July 9, 2023 Share Posted July 9, 2023 1 minute ago, bickster said: It wouldn’t be an employment tribunal The BBC would be held responsible for he torrent of hate that would be directed towards said individual whose life would be changed permanently by the accusation The BBC would in all likelihood settle out of court for a massive sum. What about other presenters falsely accused and abused on social media because the BBC didn’t rule them out? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
est1874 Posted July 9, 2023 Share Posted July 9, 2023 7 minutes ago, Genie said: Then he’ll go back to work I assume. It sticks for a while but blows over eventually. Sir Cliff Richard seems to be doing alright despite his wrestle with infamy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bickster Posted July 9, 2023 Moderator Share Posted July 9, 2023 10 minutes ago, Genie said: What about other presenters falsely accused and abused on social media because the BBC didn’t rule them out? Hopefully they'll sue the idiots who named them. There is talk that Lineker, Rylan and a few others are getting together to do just that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trekka Posted July 9, 2023 VT Supporter Share Posted July 9, 2023 4 minutes ago, bickster said: Hopefully they'll sue the idiots who named them. There is talk that Lineker, Rylan and a few others are getting together to do just that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Genie Posted July 9, 2023 Share Posted July 9, 2023 10 minutes ago, trekka said: If the BBC name who they had suspended none of this would happen… 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts