blandy Posted Friday at 12:33 Moderator Share Posted Friday at 12:33 30 minutes ago, foreveryoung said: I'm sure I heard the PL get a small percentage of any player transfer. So they are probably shitting there pants of the amount of money coming in this window with all the swaps. They won't wantit to become a regular occurance, even though it's a good way of dealing. It's important to remember that "the PL" is the 20 clubs. It's not some external organisation like the FA, or the EFL. It's basically some officials the clubs appointed to do the admin and whatnot around all the aspects of PL football - fixtures, commercial, sponsorship of the league, selling TV rights, accounting, referees, stadium rules and all the rest of it. The clubs have regular meetings and talk about if a change is needed to this that or the other, and then they vote on it, and it needs 14 clubs to agree for anything to change. So the idea that the clubs are somehow scared about the amount of money coming in from this transfer window doesn't stand up. If loads come in, the clubs "transfer levy" fund is better off, and they look good when they dish it out. and if less comes in, they have collectively had to spend less money, so that's good, too and likely reflects PSR compliance is having a positive impact (aside from the amortisation). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
villa4europe Posted Friday at 13:02 Share Posted Friday at 13:02 1 hour ago, foreveryoung said: I'm sure I heard the PL get a small percentage of any player transfer. So they are probably shitting there pants of the amount of money coming in this window with all the swaps. They won't wantit to become a regular occurance, even though it's a good way of dealing. but that wouldnt change? these swaps are being written up as luiz moves to juve for £20m + two players but in reality its still going through the books as juve paying us £50m and us paying them 2 x £15m with what you're suggesting the PL would still get their cut 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kiwivillan Posted Saturday at 11:02 Share Posted Saturday at 11:02 Where was PL last season over valuation of Cole Palmer. Turns out was bargain of the season for 40m odd but why was nothing said then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Czarnikjak Posted Saturday at 11:04 Share Posted Saturday at 11:04 Just now, Kiwivillan said: Where was PL last season over valuation of Cole Palmer. Turns out was bargain of the season for 40m odd but why was nothing said then? It's about transactions where players go both ways. Chelsea didn't swap anybody for Cole Palmer (AFAIK). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gwi1890 Posted Saturday at 11:11 Share Posted Saturday at 11:11 6 minutes ago, Czarnikjak said: It's about transactions where players go both ways. Chelsea didn't swap anybody for Cole Palmer (AFAIK). Kovacic 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
duke313 Posted Saturday at 11:44 Share Posted Saturday at 11:44 Newcastle seem in a bit of bother PSR wise. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gwi1890 Posted Saturday at 14:14 Share Posted Saturday at 14:14 3 hours ago, Czarnikjak said: It's about transactions where players go both ways. Chelsea didn't swap anybody for Cole Palmer (AFAIK). I know Kovacic wasn’t a Chelsea academy player but he went the other way in a separate deal shy of £30m. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Awol Posted Saturday at 14:20 Share Posted Saturday at 14:20 2 hours ago, duke313 said: Newcastle seem in a bit of bother PSR wise. Yep, sounds like Liverpool are circling for Gordon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikeyp102 Posted Saturday at 14:35 Share Posted Saturday at 14:35 (edited) Just seen Newcastle tried a swap deal with Liverpool (Gordon for Quansah). We’ve set a precedent now and others will see the benefit of it. Well done Villa for trying out things to circumnavigate the stupid restrictions Edited Sunday at 10:21 by mikeyp102 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OutByEaster? Posted Saturday at 14:38 Moderator Share Posted Saturday at 14:38 There seems to be an odd rumour that they might be about to sell Strawberry Place, a little patch of land behind the Gallowgate End to Aramco for about £360m. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chindie Posted Saturday at 14:50 VT Supporter Share Posted Saturday at 14:50 We are about 2 steps away from every team ceremonially selling a chair to some paper company for a billion on June 30th every year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TS Posted Saturday at 15:51 Share Posted Saturday at 15:51 The logical end game of FFP is that all clubs will act as businesses. You can already see it in how some teams utilise their stadiums, Spurs being probably the best example with their race track, gigs and NFL games. Honestly won't be surprised if Man Utd are your landlord in the not too distant future. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LondonLax Posted Saturday at 18:50 Share Posted Saturday at 18:50 7 hours ago, duke313 said: Newcastle seem in a bit of bother PSR wise. This should help Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoelVilla Posted Saturday at 19:43 Share Posted Saturday at 19:43 I am so tired of these rules. Need to change. Like Newcastle or us need protection from going bust with our respective owners. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Demitri_C Posted Saturday at 20:13 Share Posted Saturday at 20:13 1 hour ago, LondonLax said: This should help Ive never heard of him so how many anyone moan at us when this guys going for 33m?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StewieGriffin Posted Saturday at 20:23 Share Posted Saturday at 20:23 1 hour ago, LondonLax said: This should help Perhaps not helping as much as you think... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oishiiniku_uk Posted Monday at 14:13 Share Posted Monday at 14:13 (edited) Is anyone else surprised that Nottingham Forest didn't sell more players before June 30th (just the reserve keeper Vlachodimos to Newcastle for few mil, far as I can tell)? Surely there's a good chance they get another points deduction next season. Although maybe their demagogue owner is gearing up to the take the PL to court anyway... EDIT: Looks like they're also selling Niakhate to Lyon. Edited Monday at 14:33 by oishiiniku_uk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LondonLax Posted Monday at 18:23 Share Posted Monday at 18:23 4 hours ago, oishiiniku_uk said: Is anyone else surprised that Nottingham Forest didn't sell more players before June 30th (just the reserve keeper Vlachodimos to Newcastle for few mil, far as I can tell)? Surely there's a good chance they get another points deduction next season. Although maybe their demagogue owner is gearing up to the take the PL to court anyway... EDIT: Looks like they're also selling Niakhate to Lyon. They are probably a bit better off now that their championship years are dropping out of their 3 year cycle and they are booking regular Premier League incomes instead. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts