useless Posted June 19 Share Posted June 19 If you read the actual article all it says is that Duran hasn't agreed personal terms yet, the part about Duran needing to lower his wage demands is just the journalist guessing as to why personal terms haven't been agreed yet, hence the 'may' in he 'may have to lower his wage demands', the article isn't outright saying that that's the issue Also Romano said last night that Duran has given the deal the 'green light', but we haven't given the deal the 'green light' yet, we're apparently difficult to deal with, and the transfer has to be a swap deal The main threat to the deal is probably Chelsea deciding to for a different striker, might depend on how much Atletico are willing to accept for Omorodion, and if Chelsea are willing to pay for it, Atletico already turned down an offer worth £40m and Romano saying Chelsea won't pay his £80m release clause, and the player himself isn't desperate to leave, so that one will probably be quite expensive, I guess will come down to whether Chelsea think it's worth it versus whatever they would have to pay for Duran 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jas10 Posted June 19 Share Posted June 19 Need to get this done asap… maybe other deals won’t be such a priority or even needed then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zatman Posted June 19 Share Posted June 19 1 hour ago, Talldarkandransome said: If it's all true then he's coming across as a bit of a knob, I personally wouldn't touch him. Acting like a big time charlie By rejecting a transfer to a club lower down the table? Most players would be asking more in that situation Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TDR V2 Posted June 19 Share Posted June 19 9 minutes ago, Zatman said: By rejecting a transfer to a club lower down the table? Most players would be asking more in that situation That he appears desperate to go to. He can't really demand anything yet, he's done f all Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jas10 Posted June 19 Share Posted June 19 Come on @CarryOnVilla We need your Uncle Phil gif here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CarryOnVilla Posted June 19 Share Posted June 19 2 minutes ago, Jas10 said: Come on @CarryOnVilla We need your Uncle Phil gif here. It’s primed and ready Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jas10 Posted June 19 Share Posted June 19 3 minutes ago, CarryOnVilla said: It’s primed and ready 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jas10 Posted June 19 Share Posted June 19 Must be off to Chelsea… we’ve just signed Maatsen 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MSvillain Posted June 19 Share Posted June 19 (edited) Get this joker on the next megabus down to London Edited June 19 by MSvillain *downgraded him from national express to megabus 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jas10 Posted June 19 Share Posted June 19 7 hours ago, CarryOnVilla said: It’s primed and ready Get ready 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaVilla Posted June 19 Share Posted June 19 i wonder if he will go for a magical 37.5m...... straight PSR magic trick. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CarryOnVilla Posted June 19 Share Posted June 19 21 minutes ago, MaVilla said: i wonder if he will go for a magical 37.5m...... straight PSR magic trick. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CVByrne Posted June 19 Share Posted June 19 1 hour ago, Jas10 said: Must be off to Chelsea… we’ve just signed Maatsen Duran it seems just needs to accept Chelsea's contract offer. I assume he is so stupid he won't and they will move on from him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tubby Posted June 19 Share Posted June 19 1 hour ago, MaVilla said: i wonder if he will go for a magical 37.5m...... straight PSR magic trick. Hey Paul Daniels, can you explain this please? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AshVilla Posted June 19 Share Posted June 19 I hope he gets the tube down in London... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaVilla Posted June 19 Share Posted June 19 5 minutes ago, Tubby said: Hey Paul Daniels, can you explain this please? do u rly want it explaining or u jokin? dont mind explaining, just not sure if its a joke response or not? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tubby Posted June 19 Share Posted June 19 (edited) 14 minutes ago, MaVilla said: do u rly want it explaining or u jokin? dont mind explaining, just not sure if its a joke response or not? Definitely keen for a genuine explanation. £37.5m seems like an arbitrary figure so I'm curious as to why it might be considered "magical?" Cheers Edited June 19 by Tubby Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaVilla Posted June 19 Share Posted June 19 (edited) 7 minutes ago, Tubby said: Definitely keen for the genuine explanation. Cheers cool np. example. I buy a player from Tubby FC for 5m, i amortise that over the maximum 5 years, so the book cost is actually only 1m a year, so this year i spent 1m. Tubby FC buys a player from MaVilla FC for 5m, you amortise that over the maximum 5 years, so the book cost is actually only 1m a year, so this year you spent 1m. In both scenarios we choose to book ALL the profit in this year, so on paper, both you and i made 5m in sales, booked as 5m, but we both only spent 1m, so on paper, we both made 4m profit. Obviously this kicks the cost can down the road, and we will need to make sure we can afford to cover these costs later, but as of right now, we both made a sweet 4m each THIS YEAR, even though we bought a player off each other for 5m, so in theory....a net of nothing, but we just turned it in to a 4m profit. Its a bit like the PSR pyramid scheme..... Edited June 19 by MaVilla Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tubby Posted June 19 Share Posted June 19 1 minute ago, MaVilla said: cool np. example. I buy a player from Tubby FC for 5m, i amortise that over the maximum 5 years, so the book cost is actually only 1m a year, so this year i spent 1m. Tubby FC buys a player from MaVilla FC for 5m, you amortise that over the maximum 5 years, so the book cost is actually only 1m a year, so this year you spent 1m. In both scenarios we choose to book ALL the profit in this year, so on paper, both you and i made 5m in sales, booked as 5m, but we both only spent 1m, so on paper, we both made 4m profit. Obviously this kicks the cost can down the road, and we will need to make sure we can afford to cover these costs later, but as of right now, we both made a sweet 4m each THIS YEAR, even though we bought a player off each other for 5m, so in theory....a net of nothing. I see, so was the £37.5m fee relative to what Chelsea would pay for Duran in this scenario? Not that it is otherwise a particularly special number? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaVilla Posted June 19 Share Posted June 19 (edited) 4 minutes ago, Tubby said: I see, so was the £37.5m fee relative to what Chelsea would pay for Duran in this scenario? Not that it is otherwise a particularly special number? Basically, the rumour is we are paying 37.5m for Maatsen, i said it would be ironic if Chelsea magically paid 37.5m as well for Duran (ie: a clear PSR trick). So, we pay 37.5m for Maatsen, amortised over 5 years, so 7.5m spent this year. They pay 37.5m for Duran, amortise over 5 years, so 7.5m spent this year. Both clubs book all the profit this year, so its a book 30m profit for both clubs right now (37.5m income, minus 7.5m spent when amortised over 5 years) its like a PSR, you scratch my back, i will scratch yours. Edited June 19 by MaVilla 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts