Kingman Posted June 11 Share Posted June 11 3 hours ago, GlobalVillan said: Gallagher isn't coming here from everything I have heard and there's no way anyone is paying 40m for Duran. That's just crazy money. If we can get £20m for one of Chuckle brothers that played about 20 minutes then I'm sure they will demand £40m for Duran 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
duke313 Posted June 11 Share Posted June 11 Just now, PaulMcGrath_5 said: €50m we can’t turn that down. What’s the PSR implications of this? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GingerCollins29 Posted June 11 Share Posted June 11 Just now, duke313 said: €50m we can’t turn that down. What’s the PSR implications of this? No implications for Chelsea, just sell another hotel 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nepal_villan Posted June 11 Share Posted June 11 2 minutes ago, GlobalVillan said: No chance is that true. It will be full of add ones to get it anywhere near that. The cash deal will be closer to £30m I'm certain. £30M and £10-15M in add-ons sounds about right. Similar to how we structured the Rogers deal with Boro. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GlobalVillan Posted June 11 Share Posted June 11 Just now, duke313 said: €50m we can’t turn that down. What’s the PSR implications of this? It will certainly help.Although, as I said back in April, he and Luiz were always going to be sold so it will have no effect on the Luiz sale. Additionally, any deal will be full of add ons which won't be added to the book value until they are activated. I expect a deal closer to 35m euros up front plus, plus etc... So about 30m quid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GlobalVillan Posted June 11 Share Posted June 11 Just now, GlobalVillan said: It will certainly help.Although, as I said back in April, he and Luiz were always going to be sold so it will have no effect on the Luiz sale. Additionally, any deal will be full of add ons which won't be added to the book value until they are activated. I expect a deal closer to 35m euros up front plus, plus etc... So about 30m quid. No idea why that tweet mentions euros though, 2 English clubs trading a Colombian player. Euros are totally irrelevant, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sharkyvilla Posted June 11 Share Posted June 11 14 minutes ago, CLARETANDBLUEFOXY said: Seeing a lot about him having a bad attitude. Any examples of this? Not disputing it, just interested as I feel I’ve missed something. I don't think Unai would sell someone with so much potential if he had the right attitude to go along with it. It seems like a good deal for all parties if it's true. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Keyblade Posted June 11 Popular Post Share Posted June 11 40m? I like the kid and think he'll be a star, but just like with Carney you have to bite their arm off for that. He hasn't proven anything to be a 40m player. We signed Ollie for less than 30 after winning Championship POTY and scoring 26 goals. 11 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
duke313 Posted June 11 Share Posted June 11 4 minutes ago, GlobalVillan said: It will certainly help.Although, as I said back in April, he and Luiz were always going to be sold so it will have no effect on the Luiz sale. Additionally, any deal will be full of add ons which won't be added to the book value until they are activated. I expect a deal closer to 35m euros up front plus, plus etc... So about 30m quid. Still good money regardless. Chelsea have such a chaotic transfer policy, sign as many talented young players as possible, and hope they stumble upon a Palmer tier one, dump the ones that don’t make the grade. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
villan-scott Posted June 11 VT Supporter Share Posted June 11 He’s probably already at Cobham - Odemwingie style! 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom13 Posted June 11 Share Posted June 11 Get him gone 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GlobalVillan Posted June 11 Share Posted June 11 2 minutes ago, duke313 said: Still good money regardless. Chelsea have such a chaotic transfer policy, sign as many talented young players as possible, and hope they stumble upon a Palmer tier one, dump the ones that don’t make the grade. Oh I agree. Great dealfor us. Doubling your money in a year is never a BAD deal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Albrighton Posted June 11 VT Supporter Share Posted June 11 Have a sell on clause inserted please. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
villarule123 Posted June 11 VT Supporter Share Posted June 11 Meh, he's clearly got bags of potential but he's probably the most immature footballer since Balotelli so anything near £40m is a good deal for us. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jayEm Posted June 11 Share Posted June 11 He doesn't seem like an Emery player, and we have to go all in on Emery. £42m is good money, we need to sell some players at some point and there's simply no one else in the squad we could get that money for who would be a smaller overall loss. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zero7 Posted June 11 Share Posted June 11 3 minutes ago, villarule123 said: Meh, he's clearly got bags of potential but he's probably the most immature footballer since Balotelli so anything near £40m is a good deal for us. Most kids are at 20 years old… Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post useless Posted June 11 Popular Post Share Posted June 11 Why are people reacting as if fifty million is an outragous fee for him, he a twenty year old striker that has already he can proven he can score at Premier League level, international level, and in Europe, he makes a positive impact almost every time he comes off the bench, he's already a top player, but his potential is off the scale, we should be demanding at least forty million, if he carries on his current trajectory he will be worth a lot more than that 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
villarule123 Posted June 11 VT Supporter Share Posted June 11 (edited) 2 minutes ago, Zero7 said: Most kids are at 20 years old… No, most kids at 20 that aspire to be a footballer would listen to Emery and trust him to progress their career. Edited June 11 by villarule123 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rightdm00 Posted June 11 Share Posted June 11 At that # we have to sell. He will absolutely end up being a top striker but he will never realize that potential playing behind Ollie. Best to make a great profit with a sell on and wish him the best. Unless he is playing us of course. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zero7 Posted June 11 Share Posted June 11 1 minute ago, villarule123 said: No, most kids at 20 that aspire to be a footballer would listen to Emery and trust him to progress their career. Bad attitude and immaturity don’t necessarily go hand in hand, I do believe he’s got bad body language and perhaps a bad attitude, but nothing I’ve seen says he’s rocking the boat. He sulks a bit that can be seen as passion as wants to play. He’s a bit petulant but will learn as he matures as a person, he’s still only 20 remember. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts