Condimentalist Posted June 11 Share Posted June 11 Big talent but we'd have to take that kind of money in our current situation. No guarantee he fulfils his potential. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Herman22 Posted June 11 Share Posted June 11 I can see why Duran wants to go to Chelsea. They will give him a monster contract and he will think he can get in the team ahead of Jackson! If we get 30-40m for him I’d take it. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PieFacE Posted June 11 Author VT Supporter Share Posted June 11 (edited) 7 minutes ago, useless said: Why are people reacting as if fifty million is an outragous fee for him, he a twenty year old striker that has already he can proven he can score at Premier League level, international level, and in Europe, he makes a positive impact almost every time he comes off the bench, he's already a top player, but his potential is off the scale, we should be demanding at least forty million, if he carries on his current trajectory he will be worth a lot more than that Don't think people are reacting as if it's outragous. It's more that it's a decent fee for a player that clearly wants to move away. Edited June 11 by PieFacE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KevinRichardsonsMoustache Posted June 11 Share Posted June 11 £30m for Duran would be good business. Get someone else in more suited to Unai’s style who can offer us something better from the bench. Boom 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
duke313 Posted June 11 Share Posted June 11 4 minutes ago, Herman22 said: I can see why Duran wants to go to Chelsea. They will give him a monster contract and he will think he can get in the team ahead of Jackson! If we get 30-40m for him I’d take it. He’s more chance getting in Chelsea team than ours, Jackson is shite. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
djdabush Posted June 11 Share Posted June 11 €50m? Tell you what, its not every day that you scam Chelsea for a talented but arrogant youngster like this... 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
villa89 Posted June 11 Share Posted June 11 11 minutes ago, useless said: Why are people reacting as if fifty million is an outragous fee for him, he a twenty year old striker that has already he can proven he can score at Premier League level, international level, and in Europe, he makes a positive impact almost every time he comes off the bench, he's already a top player, but his potential is off the scale, we should be demanding at least forty million, if he carries on his current trajectory he will be worth a lot more than that 1. He doesn't make a positive impact every time he comes off the bench. Most of the time he looks like Bambi on ice. 2. He's clearly not already a top player. That's why he's barely played for us since he joined. He has some potential but he's very much a rough diamond. This sounds like a very good deal for us. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vreitti Posted June 11 Share Posted June 11 Sounds like good business to me, if the fee is around 50M. Sure he's got potential, but he just isn't ready for what we need. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
villa4europe Posted June 11 Share Posted June 11 Chelsea asking for £30m for broja and £50m for Gallagher He's got to be worth north of £40m Madness that Chelsea are also up against PSR and yet still have £100m to spend on teenagers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
villa89 Posted June 11 Share Posted June 11 Can we chuck in Chuwuemeka as part of a player swap deal? The villatalk fascination with re-signing our old players would be placated for a transfer window. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Killeen30 Posted June 11 Share Posted June 11 25 minutes ago, Keyblade said: 40m? I like the kid and think he'll be a star, but just like with Carney you have to bite their arm off for that. He hasn't proven anything to be a 40m player. We signed Ollie for less than 30 after winning Championship POTY and scoring 26 goals. How many seasons ago did we sign Ollie though? I think inflation has to be taken into account with that example. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MWARLEY2 Posted June 11 Share Posted June 11 Maresca is a Pep manager. Dominate the ball with controlled passing. Duran is the absolute opposite of that . Chaos maker . Lots of youngsters as well. MCGInn struggled to keep him under control so god knows what it will be like in the bright lights of London with the leagues youngest team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Killeen30 Posted June 11 Share Posted June 11 3 minutes ago, villa4europe said: Chelsea asking for £30m for broja and £50m for Gallagher He's got to be worth north of £40m Madness that Chelsea are also up against PSR and yet still have £100m to spend on teenagers This. Just feels like it’s not a level playing field. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
duke313 Posted June 11 Share Posted June 11 Read between the lines Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rustibrooks Posted June 11 Share Posted June 11 Villa hadn’t posted that he was involved in an international game a few days ago, that’s when I started to suspect he might be on his way out. Anyway if we are getting that much for him then that’s good for us, I do wonder how the fee is structured as well 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GlobalVillan Posted June 11 Share Posted June 11 3 minutes ago, villa89 said: 1. He doesn't make a positive impact every time he comes off the bench. Most of the time he looks like Bambi on ice. 2. He's clearly not already a top player. That's why he's barely played for us since he joined. He has some potential but he's very much a rough diamond. This sounds like a very good deal for us. Totally agree. He also stated that his potential is "off the scale" lol. What a mental thing to say. Mind you his previous post was calling people gullible fools for believing we would sell Luiz, so it's not a great surprise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain_Townsend Posted June 11 Share Posted June 11 No issue with him going, at all. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DevonIsAPlaceOnEarth Posted June 11 Share Posted June 11 €50m for a player who’s essentially a backup, and will never be a starter whilst Watkins is here. Outstanding business. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PieFacE Posted June 11 Author VT Supporter Share Posted June 11 4 minutes ago, duke313 said: Read between the lines What does this mean? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
useless Posted June 11 Share Posted June 11 No I never called people gullable fools for believing we would sell Luiz, again that's a lie, just like when you pretend to be ITK all the time, I stated myself on numerous occasions Luiz might be sold, might point was that he was one of a number of players we could sell, and at the time there wasn't anything to suggest we would sell him over any other options other than the Italian clickbait media Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts