Jump to content

Musk's Twitter Purchase


KentVillan

Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, StefanAVFC said:

The point here is that he's made Twitter into a self-styled free speech platform, but only free speech he agrees with is allowed.

Yes, just look at what he said. Misgendering is allowed as it's at worst rude and offensive but he is now saying calling someone cis is banned as it's a slur. He just acts on his own whims at the time. He just means what he agrees with can be allowed and what he doesn't will be moderated. He's a joke

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Mr_Dogg said:

 

At least Zuck does jiu-jitsu, he might have some clue what he's doing.

Hopefully no one sees Musk tapping out and he suffocates. Then in his celebration Zuck tries to jump on top on the octagon, gets it’s wrong and breaks his neck in the fall. 
 

I’d genuinely pay £30 PPV to watch that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, sidcow said:

So **** pathetic.

Minds of children.

Would be funny to watch though (won’t happen). Surely Musk will get his arse kicked as Zuckerberg has won gold medals for martial arts. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who could have predicted that firing the majority of your staff (including a significant portion of a talented engineering department) before embarking on an unnecessary 'rework' of the API alongside the gutting of server infrastructure was a bad idea?

How long before M*sk begs the engineers he sacked (in what was likely a highly illegal manner) to come back and fix his mess?

Site's been barely functional for weeks. So many features (e.g. videos) barely worked. No surprise it's fully broken now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They are apparently limiting the amount of posts you can see a day depending on your account status

So he wants less people to be driven to the site and for those people to read less

Yep that¡ll bring in more Ad revenue

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, bickster said:

They are apparently limiting the amount of posts you can see a day depending on your account status

So he wants less people to be driven to the site and for those people to read less

Yep that¡ll bring in more Ad revenue

Awfully funny how there were never any user-facing problems or extreme actions that needed to be taken due to 'data scraping & system manipulation(???)' before he got his grubby little hands on Twitter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s going to go down as one of the worst deals in history isn’t it?

Bought for $40b and then became worthless inside a year or 2.

Facebook said they were going to create a competitor to it. I’m not sure why they or someone else hasn’t managed to just copy it, but make it work. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Genie said:

It’s going to go down as one of the worst deals in history isn’t it?

Bought for $40b and then became worthless inside a year or 2.

Facebook said they were going to create a competitor to it. I’m not sure why they or someone else hasn’t managed to just copy it, but make it work. 

User inertia, a new microblogging site needs to have some USPs for people to move. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, bickster said:

User inertia, a new microblogging site needs to have some USPs for people to move. 

This is why I thought Facebook would be all over it as about 90% of the world have accounts already.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...

exclamation-mark-man-user-icon-with-png-and-vector-format-227727.png

Ad Blocker Detected

This site is paid for by ad revenue, please disable your ad blocking software for the site.

Â