StewieGriffin Posted Saturday at 00:54 Share Posted Saturday at 00:54 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CVByrne Posted Saturday at 08:08 Share Posted Saturday at 08:08 Wonder if we have to pay him much of the £14m we owe on the remainder of his contract. If we get that in this year's accounts because we've made sales of Kellyman and Iroegbunam would be good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thabucks Posted Saturday at 08:14 Share Posted Saturday at 08:14 He’s shown before when he left Barca he’s willing to forgo millions just to play. I’m sure based on this we will have negotiated a termination which suits both parties… He’s been a model pro for us, and it’s a shame his body just cannot cope with the demands of premier league footy. Wish him all the best and thank him for his desire to play for us. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ender4 Posted Saturday at 08:50 Share Posted Saturday at 08:50 40 minutes ago, CVByrne said: Wonder if we have to pay him much of the £14m we owe on the remainder of his contract. If we get that in this year's accounts because we've made sales of Kellyman and Iroegbunam would be good. It’s a bit weird because normally the selling club would ‘sell’ the player to the buying club for free. But here they are being presented as a termination by Villa and then Vasco are buying as a free agent. I wonder why? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Czarnikjak Posted Saturday at 12:09 Share Posted Saturday at 12:09 (edited) 3 hours ago, ender4 said: It’s a bit weird because normally the selling club would ‘sell’ the player to the buying club for free. But here they are being presented as a termination by Villa and then Vasco are buying as a free agent. I wonder why? Normally you would terminate when the player demands some sort of compensation for the wages remaining on his contract. Otherwise, it would be clean sale. I can't think of another reason (although I'm sure there will be) Edited Saturday at 12:10 by Czarnikjak Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Don_Simon Posted Saturday at 12:14 Share Posted Saturday at 12:14 I'm going to Brazil in a couple of weeks and absolutely going to catch a Vasco game. Will report back on potential unearthed gems and Phillips's performance. (The signing didn't work out, but I loved his song!) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ender4 Posted Saturday at 12:28 Share Posted Saturday at 12:28 17 minutes ago, Czarnikjak said: Normally you would terminate when the player demands some sort of compensation for the wages remaining on his contract. Otherwise, it would be clean sale. I can't think of another reason (although I'm sure there will be) So if the contract remaining is £14m in wages, I guess we might be paying up to half of that to get Coutinho to leave? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CVByrne Posted Saturday at 12:53 Share Posted Saturday at 12:53 10 minutes ago, ender4 said: So if the contract remaining is £14m in wages, I guess we might be paying up to half of that to get Coutinho to leave? Well depends on what Vasco are paying and how long a contract they're offering. As if he goes on loan there and doesn't do well or is injured he might have very few options left. If they offer him a 3.5 year deal on around £4m a year he's getting his £14m plus gets to live back home with his family in Brazil with a much lower cost of living. He'll be a hero coming home and he'll be settled. He might be ok with a couple of mil settlement from us to terminate his contract. Means we'll book around a £10m loss into the accounts and we're done. This is important for the new squad cost rules as the 3 year profit and loss from player trading is averaged into 1 year. So say we've made £150m over 3 years on player trading then £50m goes additional into our income for the squad cost calculations. While if he was here out on Loan hus full wages and amortisation would be included in squad cost and our loan fee would be included in our income. So let's say 4.25m amortisation and 7m wages and loan fee is £4m then he'd have cost of 11.25m and income of 4m If we terminated his contract (IE we transfer him for zero to Vasco) we would have his book value of 8.5m as a loss on player sales. This goes into the 3 year total for profit and loss on player trading like Luiz and Archer and Chukwuemeka etc.. over last 3 years and it's divided by 3 to give us an annual amount. So the negative cost of the 8.5m ends up as -2.83m for next the 2024, 2025 and 2026 calendar years for UEFA. This is why this makes sense for those rules of we're now fine on PSR. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jas10 Posted 5 hours ago Share Posted 5 hours ago Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CVByrne Posted 3 hours ago Share Posted 3 hours ago (edited) 2 hours ago, Jas10 said: Why you finding the dregs of the bs twitter account to post? 145 followers, makes up info and pretends it's via a reputable source by tagging them Edited 3 hours ago by CVByrne Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jas10 Posted 3 hours ago Share Posted 3 hours ago 2 minutes ago, CVByrne said: Why you finding the dregs of the bs twitter account to post? 145 followers, makes up info and pretends it's via a reputable source by tagging them Well there’s multiple accounts or sources saying the same thing so I just posted the most recent one on feed… many accounts quote more established accounts too, can’t be arsed to constantly check or research and when it’s not necessary. Anyway, looks like we’re going with the loan after all rather than the termination. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zatman Posted 3 hours ago Share Posted 3 hours ago 3 minutes ago, CVByrne said: Why you finding the dregs of the bs twitter account to post? 145 followers, makes up info and pretends it's via a reputable source by tagging them Geglobo has 6.5 million followers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jas10 Posted 3 hours ago Share Posted 3 hours ago (edited) 4 minutes ago, CVByrne said: Why you finding the dregs of the bs twitter account to post? 145 followers, makes up info and pretends it's via a reputable source by tagging them There’s a longer, alternative one posted in the summer window thread. Stating the same. Edited 2 hours ago by Jas10 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CVByrne Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago (edited) 1 hour ago, Zatman said: Geglobo has 6.5 million followers Of course they do. A random account with 145 followers though Edited 1 hour ago by CVByrne Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zatman Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago 1 minute ago, CVByrne said: OF course they do. A random account with 145 followers made up information that Geglobo didn't post and then pretended he was quoting them by putting @ them in his tweet. ie it's twitter spam Except its on GeGlobo Twitter and website Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CVByrne Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago 1 hour ago, Jas10 said: There’s a longer, alternative one posted in the summer window thread. Stating the same. Yes, just quote that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CVByrne Posted 59 minutes ago Share Posted 59 minutes ago (edited) 1 minute ago, Zatman said: Except its on GeGlobo Twitter and website The one I posted above? I've a thing for news not from twitter account with real amount of followers. Is it real or made up. Usually latter hence always look for original source Edited 57 minutes ago by CVByrne 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jas10 Posted 50 minutes ago Share Posted 50 minutes ago 8 minutes ago, CVByrne said: The one I posted above? I've a thing for news not from twitter account with real amount of followers. Is it real or made up. Usually latter hence always look for original source Sorry, didn’t realise you were the boss around here. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zatman Posted 46 minutes ago Share Posted 46 minutes ago 12 minutes ago, CVByrne said: The one I posted above? I've a thing for news not from twitter account with real amount of followers. Is it real or made up. Usually latter hence always look for original source The source was quoted in the tweet Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CVByrne Posted 43 minutes ago Share Posted 43 minutes ago 5 minutes ago, Jas10 said: Sorry, didn’t realise you were the boss around here. I'm not, I just rant from time to time at people quoting tweets with next to no followers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts