Jump to content

Jaden Philogene


Kingman

Recommended Posts

14 minutes ago, Zatman said:

Strange move unless we are going to play 5 widemen a game.

Not an upgrade on Diaby if we are selling him

If he's improved as much as I think he has having watched him very closely at Hull, twinned with the borderline-miraculous effect Emery had on Rogers coming from the Championship, then prepare to be astonished at his level which could be in excess of even Diaby's by Christmas time.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Steero113 said:

If he's improved as much as I think he has having watched him very closely at Hull, twinned with the borderline-miraculous effect Emery had on Rogers coming from the Championship, then prepare to be astonished at his level which could be in excess of even Diaby's by Christmas time.  

OK.  I'm holding you to this 😝

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, ender4 said:

£18m (with a sell-on fee being paid back to us of around £4m).

Think the sell on Fee was flat 30% of sale price so we end up paying 12.6m for him and we'd sold him for £5m. 

So he'll cost us £2.52m per season amortisation and his sale of 5m is worth £1.67 per year when averaed over the 3 year accounts for PSR and Squad cost rule. So net it's 0.85m cost per year + the difference in his wages from last season to his new contract. 

Seems a great deal. Well played Monchi with these clauses

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it makes sense to Unai, Monchi and those others at the club who are fully aware of the footballing and finance factors, what's not to like?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CVByrne said:

Think the sell on Fee was flat 30% of sale price so we end up paying 12.6m for him and we'd sold him for £5m. 

So he'll cost us £2.52m per season amortisation and his sale of 5m is worth £1.67 per year when averaed over the 3 year accounts for PSR and Squad cost rule. So net it's 0.85m cost per year + the difference in his wages from last season to his new contract. 

Seems a great deal. Well played Monchi with these clauses

I think the base price is £18m so that's amortised as £3.6m per year for the next 5 years. 

The 30% sell-on of £5m or so is income so fully counts in 24/25 only.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rumour Emery didn’t want to sell him in the first place makes this even more understandable. For the price this is a no brainier. Need to go big on a cm, cb, rb and if Duran goes striker. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Tomaszk said:

Really pleased.

The Championship is harder than most European leagues IMO.

He comfortably outshone Rogers there, and look what he did at the end of last season.

This is one for us, mate. We deserve this. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, rodders0223 said:

13m for our own player. Whilst fans get shafted out of pennies.

Hail Monchi.

A poor bit of player analysis for sure.

He wanted to go and play...but we had him under contract. Monchi and Emery allowed him to go for a poor fee.

To swap him for one year of Zaniolo was rank decision making, and looked it the whole way through the season.

Learn and move on.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Tomaszk said:

A poor bit of player analysis for sure.

He wanted to go and play...but we had him under contract. Monchi and Emery allowed him to go for a poor fee.

To swap him for one year of Zaniolo was rank decision making, and looked it the whole way through the season.

Learn and move on.

At least we should have put in proper buy back clause (let's say £10m), not "matching" clause where you depend on other teams offers. If Hull wanted him so much they would have to accept it.

Not the wisest decision by Monchi et al.

Edited by Czarnikjak
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Zatman said:

Strange move unless we are going to play 5 widemen a game.

Not an upgrade on Diaby if we are selling him

As a winger he probably is, as a player generally he isn’t yet. But the price we’re getting for Diaby we can’t reject. Both aren’t first 11 players as well. 
Really excited with those movements. Selling Diaby and Duran I think we’ll atleast get another forward and a CM. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Czarnikjak said:

At least we should have put in proper buy back clause (let's say £10m), not "matching" clause where you depend on other teams offers. If Hull wanted him so much they would have to accept it.

Not the wisest decision by Monchi et al.

dua-lipa-face-meme.jpg?q=65&auto=format&

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Czarnikjak said:

At least we should have put in proper buy back clause (let's say £10m), not "matching" clause where you depend on other teams offers. If Hull wanted him so much they would have to accept it.

Not the wisest decision by Monchi et al.

I don’t know the exact rules but this probably alludes to why we did it that way…

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

well happy he's coming back

we also seem to be getting a lot of our transfer business done really early

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

JPB was probably our best player at the summer series last year. Glad to have him back and I think he will push our starters for a place in the team. 

Financially it’s a very good deal too! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...

exclamation-mark-man-user-icon-with-png-and-vector-format-227727.png

Ad Blocker Detected

This site is paid for by ad revenue, please disable your ad blocking software for the site.

Â