Jump to content

Douglas Luiz


LondonLax

Recommended Posts

Why is there no reporting of the sell on clause now the Luiz deal complete? Athletic normally on the ball and it's not in their article on the deal completing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a big loss but it's not the same as selling Grealish as I think Tielemans can do what Luiz did and if we sign another player that csn fill that role too we will be okay 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, CVByrne said:

Why is there no reporting of the sell on clause now the Luiz deal complete? Athletic normally on the ball and it's not in their article on the deal completing

No mention in the Juventus press release about a sell on clause

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, striker said:

Thank **** he’s gone.

Villa’s midfield will be much better without him.

Coming from the Everton supporter 😅

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Zatman said:

No mention in the Juventus press release about a sell on clause

More about Man City reportedly had one. It's not been mentioned at all recently in anything about the sale. When in other sales their sell on clause and profit was reported 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 01/07/2024 at 06:25, Zatman said:

When you said Phillips was a good player ruined any credibility you had about football knowledge

You love me really @Zatman

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 01/07/2024 at 16:28, CVByrne said:

More about Man City reportedly had one. It's not been mentioned at all recently in anything about the sale. When in other sales their sell on clause and profit was reported 

Even that's wrong, they had a buy back clause that lasted 2 seasons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, tinker said:

Even that's wrong, they had a buy back clause that lasted 2 seasons.

yeah thinking was only a buy back and not a sell on clause they had then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, The_Steve said:

£8.5m to City from the sell on clause

 

 

If this is true, then it makes more sense why the deal appears cheap. Instead of paying us an extra £10m or more for him, which we'd not get all of as we'd have to give some of it to City, instead take that £10m off the cost of the other two coming our way. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I swear he wasn't taking this long after the whistle earlier in the season. Stood there for 20 seconds just like the miss in conference knock out. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...

exclamation-mark-man-user-icon-with-png-and-vector-format-227727.png

Ad Blocker Detected

This site is paid for by ad revenue, please disable your ad blocking software for the site.

Â