limpid Posted Friday at 15:08 Administrator Share Posted Friday at 15:08 2 hours ago, ender4 said: Nuke London of course! That London where all his mates invested their dirty money? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
magnkarl Posted Sunday at 12:22 Share Posted Sunday at 12:22 So Russia has had to send two of their best divisions who were spearheading the Pokrovsk offensive back to stabilise the front in Kursk. Going to plan for Ukraine, for once. The Pokrovsk axis hasn't seen any considerable movement for a good while. Let's hope the autumn starts getting horrendously wet and cold asap. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mandy Lifeboats Posted Monday at 07:29 Share Posted Monday at 07:29 On 13/09/2024 at 15:08, sidcow said: Yes, he could attack a few undersea cables and pipes but it's not going to help in his war. Absolutely. Russia is now dependent upon gas flowing south. It would literally take 20 missile hits to completely remove Russia's ability to export gas via pipelines. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
astondalston Posted Monday at 09:05 VT Supporter Share Posted Monday at 09:05 On 13/09/2024 at 13:36, GarethRDR said: I mean... I'm with him on Dalston at the very least. Hey, that hurts.... 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
magnkarl Posted Monday at 10:08 Share Posted Monday at 10:08 (edited) This constant dithering over long range capability while Russia bombs hospitals, schools and other civilian infrastructure with North Korean and Iranian missiles shows how weak 'our' team is when it comes to this. Norway and Denmark are considering if they should set up shop and help Ukraine with their own missile programmes as the 'bigger' partners are just being cowards. They're both extremely capable producers of everything needed in missiles, and Norway are currently supplying the US with the F35 cruise missile JSM\NSM. I'm really disappointed in the US, France and UK on this. We're just letting this war go on for years at the expense of millions of Ukrainians. Edited Monday at 10:11 by magnkarl 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mozzavfc Posted Monday at 10:43 Share Posted Monday at 10:43 TBF to us and the French we've been on the Ukrainian side of this for a while now. It's the Americans and Germans who aren't sure, and as we need to show a united front to the Russians, we can't undercut our partners Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TreeVillan Posted Monday at 11:29 Share Posted Monday at 11:29 3 hours ago, Mandy Lifeboats said: Absolutely. Russia is now dependent upon gas flowing south. It would literally take 20 missile hits to completely remove Russia's ability to export gas via pipelines. The pipelines sending resources to Nato countries? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mandy Lifeboats Posted Monday at 12:12 Share Posted Monday at 12:12 39 minutes ago, TreeVillan said: The pipelines sending resources to Nato countries? A few. But mainly to China. I would be surprised if Russia continued supplying gas to NATO countries if it was at war with NATO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
magnkarl Posted Monday at 12:24 Share Posted Monday at 12:24 1 hour ago, Mozzavfc said: TBF to us and the French we've been on the Ukrainian side of this for a while now. It's the Americans and Germans who aren't sure, and as we need to show a united front to the Russians, we can't undercut our partners Look at the graphic over your post and see if you still think the French are a great ally. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TreeVillan Posted Monday at 13:42 Share Posted Monday at 13:42 1 hour ago, Mandy Lifeboats said: A few. But mainly to China. I would be surprised if Russia continued supplying gas to NATO countries if it was at war with NATO. I don't think we should be bombing pipelines supplying anything to China personally. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
limpid Posted Monday at 15:11 Administrator Share Posted Monday at 15:11 1 hour ago, TreeVillan said: I don't think we should be bombing pipelines supplying anything to China personally. Who is "we" in this context? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post TreeVillan Posted Monday at 16:07 Popular Post Share Posted Monday at 16:07 54 minutes ago, limpid said: Who is "we" in this context? Aston Villa 2 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mandy Lifeboats Posted Monday at 16:37 Share Posted Monday at 16:37 2 hours ago, TreeVillan said: I don't think we should be bombing pipelines supplying anything to China personally. I don't think you should be personally bombing anything. Leave it to the RAF. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ender4 Posted Monday at 18:32 Share Posted Monday at 18:32 2 hours ago, TreeVillan said: Aston Villa We could bomb the Sty? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TreeVillan Posted Monday at 18:44 Share Posted Monday at 18:44 11 minutes ago, ender4 said: We could bomb the Sty? Would anybody notice a difference? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sidcow Posted Monday at 18:51 VT Supporter Share Posted Monday at 18:51 5 minutes ago, TreeVillan said: Would anybody notice a difference? Of course. For a start there'd be a hole in the roof where the rain pisses through..... Oh wait! 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Enda Posted yesterday at 09:16 Share Posted yesterday at 09:16 14 hours ago, ender4 said: We could bomb a civilian target in Birmingham *Irish guy leaves the chat* 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mandy Lifeboats Posted yesterday at 09:36 Share Posted yesterday at 09:36 19 minutes ago, Enda said: *Irish guy leaves the chat* Bravo sir. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bickster Posted yesterday at 09:37 Moderator Share Posted yesterday at 09:37 Yes yes very amusing but lets get back on topic please. Last time I checked the Sty wasn't in Ukraine Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mandy Lifeboats Posted yesterday at 09:48 Share Posted yesterday at 09:48 I was just watching an interesting video. To cut a long story short, Russia is taking over Libyan ports. This will gives them a naval base in the Mediterranean. This is especially important because they can now maintain submarines and resupply destroyers. There was a lit of speculation whether Russia has the actual manpower to maintain these facilities or is simplying throwing money at Libya. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts