Stevo985 Posted February 4, 2016 VT Supporter Share Posted February 4, 2016 Steveo thanks for the lengthy reply but my point was .... we still don't know who's on the panel that had the final decision. This is the important bit, isnt it? Then I'm not sure I understand your point. Your OP seemed to be annoyed that the club wasn't doing enough. Not standing up to the decision. But now you're just annoyed that you don't know who's on the panel? We're not allowed to know. The club know, as they raised the case and part of it was the potential conflict of interest. So what exactly is your point? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tinker Posted February 5, 2016 VT Supporter Share Posted February 5, 2016 Look its my point and if you don't understand my point then just move on, Let it go. Rumour I have heard is that an x Norwich player was the one who objected in both cases. Anyway its not going to happen so may as well forget my point, whatever it was . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jon_c Posted February 5, 2016 Share Posted February 5, 2016 Are the names of the members of an independent panel not easily accessible public knowledge? It can have any fairness and transparency if they're not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stevo985 Posted February 5, 2016 VT Supporter Share Posted February 5, 2016 3 hours ago, tinker said: Look its my point and if you don't understand my point then just move on, Let it go. I don't think you understand your point to be honest 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Djemba_Villan Posted February 5, 2016 Share Posted February 5, 2016 Birmingham Mail with a good article on this Here Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rds1983 Posted February 5, 2016 VT Supporter Share Posted February 5, 2016 It's ridiculous that part of the decision is based upon transfer fee and wages. Not only does this favour the bigger clubs but negates trying to find a bargain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
momo Posted February 5, 2016 Share Posted February 5, 2016 I don't understand these rules. Is there a limit to how many non-EU players a club can have? If so, why use a board to decide if a player is good enough? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeMcKenna Posted February 5, 2016 VT Supporter Share Posted February 5, 2016 Who gives a **** - he isn't coming! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
momo Posted February 5, 2016 Share Posted February 5, 2016 I give a ****, because I am curious. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeMcKenna Posted February 6, 2016 VT Supporter Share Posted February 6, 2016 (edited) On 4 February 2016 at 16:48, tinker said: Steveo thanks for the lengthy reply but my point was .... we still don't know who's on the panel that had the final decision. This is the important bit, isnt it? Tinker whether your point is well made or not, you have to always bear in mind that the 'sport" for some on VT (and other forums) is less to do with AVFC/football and more to do with their condescending and baiting nature. Edited February 6, 2016 by MikeMcKenna 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TB Posted February 6, 2016 Share Posted February 6, 2016 1 hour ago, MikeMcKenna said: Tinker whether your point is well made or not, you have to always bear in mind that the 'sport" for some on VT (and other forums) is less to do with AVFC/football and more to do with their condescending and baiting nature. In general I'll agree with the bolded bit of your post, but IMO you're wide off the mark here. To quote mwj: Did you even read the rest of the thread? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mwj Posted February 6, 2016 Author Share Posted February 6, 2016 I don't understand these rules. Is there a limit to how many non-EU players a club can have? If so, why use a board to decide if a player is good enough? They made the rules more difficult last year in a effort to ensure more young English kids got first team football by reducing non EU players. Nevermind the fact that you haven't won a WC in 50 years has nothing to do with the number of foreigners in the Premier League and everything to do with your grassroots coaching in this country being shit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stevo985 Posted February 6, 2016 VT Supporter Share Posted February 6, 2016 15 hours ago, MikeMcKenna said: Tinker whether your point is well made or not, you have to always bear in mind that the 'sport" for some on VT (and other forums) is less to do with AVFC/football and more to do with their condescending and baiting nature. Wind your neck in mate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ingram85 Posted February 6, 2016 Share Posted February 6, 2016 Good forbid of having a discussion and seeking clarification on a forum. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tinker Posted February 6, 2016 VT Supporter Share Posted February 6, 2016 Don't tell em ur name Pike Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeMcKenna Posted February 6, 2016 VT Supporter Share Posted February 6, 2016 7 hours ago, Stevo985 said: Wind your neck in mate. Oh dear...... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tomaszk Posted February 7, 2016 Share Posted February 7, 2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts