jacketspuds Posted January 26, 2016 Share Posted January 26, 2016 Can he play up front? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chrissmith921 Posted January 26, 2016 Share Posted January 26, 2016 20 hours ago, Zatman said: then we be playing 5 at the back every game or playing Debuchy further up the pitch maybe as a wide player And? We look far more solid like that - admittedly we need goals but we're better like that (imo). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zatman Posted January 26, 2016 Share Posted January 26, 2016 36 minutes ago, chrissmith921 said: And? We look far more solid like that - admittedly we need goals but we're better like that (imo). well we didnt play 5 at the back vs West Brom Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob182 Posted January 26, 2016 Share Posted January 26, 2016 We haven't played with 5 at the back for months, Chris. Our recent 'good form' has been with a back 4. If Debuchy signs then our defence should be: Cissokho - Lescott - Okore - Debuchy If Lescott has a dip in form then Richards can replace him. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zatman Posted February 1, 2016 Share Posted February 1, 2016 off to Bordeaux after Arsenal rejected a bid from United. he played us from the start and never had any intention of signing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard Posted February 1, 2016 Share Posted February 1, 2016 Would have been utterly pointless anyway I never got why , if we were at all, we were remotely interested in him 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mwj Posted February 1, 2016 Share Posted February 1, 2016 8 minutes ago, Richard said: Would have been utterly pointless anyway I never got why , if we were at all, we were remotely interested in him Would have loved it if it meant Richards was nowhere near the starting 11... alas... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wainy316 Posted February 1, 2016 Share Posted February 1, 2016 33 minutes ago, Richard said: Would have been utterly pointless anyway I never got why , if we were at all, we were remotely interested in him Because our right back options of Bacuna, Richards and Hutton are all turd. Obviously striker would've been a priority but right back is a very weak area. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard Posted February 1, 2016 Share Posted February 1, 2016 1 minute ago, Wainy316 said: Because our right back options of Bacuna, Richards and Hutton are all turd. Obviously striker would've been a priority but right back is a very weak area. and what difference would it make for 3 months? We dont need short term, it wont help us. We need longer term to rebuild again 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr_Pangloss Posted February 1, 2016 Share Posted February 1, 2016 (edited) He wouldn't offer anywhere near enough, very rarely will a right back drive results, he's not exactly Cafu is he? Edited February 1, 2016 by Dr_Pangloss Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard Posted February 1, 2016 Share Posted February 1, 2016 2 minutes ago, Dr_Pangloss said: He wouldn't offer anywhere near enough, very rarely will a right back drive results, he's not exactly Cafu is he? Or Kyle Walker the season Houllier got him on loan! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barney_avfc Posted February 1, 2016 Share Posted February 1, 2016 Apparent now that he's just another mercenary. Good riddens, hope you break into the French squad the day before you break your leg. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HanoiVillan Posted February 1, 2016 Share Posted February 1, 2016 25 minutes ago, Barney_avfc said: Apparent now that he's just another mercenary. Good riddens, hope you break into the French squad the day before you break your leg. What a bizarre degree of anger to direct at a player who made absolutely clear all along that we were his final choice. He hasn't misled anyone, maybe you misled yourself perhaps. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr_Pangloss Posted February 1, 2016 Share Posted February 1, 2016 (edited) 5 minutes ago, HanoiVillan said: What a bizarre degree of anger to direct at a player who made absolutely clear all along that we were his final choice. He hasn't misled anyone, maybe you misled yourself perhaps. I agree, no point getting worked up over a signing who would have added nothing in the first place. Edited February 1, 2016 by Dr_Pangloss Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barney_avfc Posted February 1, 2016 Share Posted February 1, 2016 7 minutes ago, HanoiVillan said: What a bizarre degree of anger to direct at a player who made absolutely clear all along that we were his final choice. He hasn't misled anyone, maybe you misled yourself perhaps. Nah just pissed off at the whole situation we find ourselves in. This and I had a bet on him joining us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HanoiVillan Posted February 1, 2016 Share Posted February 1, 2016 1 minute ago, Barney_avfc said: Nah just pissed off at the whole situation we find ourselves in. This and I had a bet on him joining us. Ha, well I suppose I'd find that pretty annoying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dont_do_it_doug. Posted February 1, 2016 Share Posted February 1, 2016 and what difference would it make for 3 months? We dont need short term, it wont help us. We need longer term to rebuild again Because, whether you agree or not, the manager believed that with 4/5 of HIS signings he could have kept us up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HanoiVillan Posted February 1, 2016 Share Posted February 1, 2016 Time to lock this sucker. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts