Jump to content

The banker loving, baby-eating Tory party thread (regenerated)


blandy

Recommended Posts

Just now, bickster said:

Surely the entire country has got to Achtung Baby by now?

It feels at times like Songs of innocence. We are stuck with it regardless of if we asked for it. 

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So this is going EXACTLY how EVERYONE outside of government expected

Quote

The UN's refugee agency warned the Home Office twice that its arrangement to send asylum seekers to Rwanda was unlawful, the High Court has heard.

A lawyer for the agency made the claim as a legal challenge to stop the process got under way.

The government aims to discourage people crossing the English Channel to seek asylum by making it clear many cases will now be dealt with by Rwanda.

About 100 people have been told they may be on the first flight, on Tuesday. 

Just before the start of the hearing, it emerged at least three people have been told they will not now be put on that flight.

Home Office lawyers told the court the plan must not be stopped by legal challenges because it was in the public interest and also urged a judge to reject challenges on behalf of individual asylum seekers.

Link

I’d hate to think of how many millions have been wasted on this so far.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Seat68 said:

They are all the same seems to be the stock response. Based on nothing. 

Even that argument makes no sense.

They are all the same so I'm going to continue voting for the ones that are doing an absolutely shit job currently.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

19 hours ago, bannedfromHandV said:

Looks like a scene out of village of the damned.

Pic is clearly fake, Boris would be on the far right of the pic not the left.

Edited by AshVilla
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, AshVilla said:

 

Pic is clearly fake, Boris would be on the far right of the pic not the left.

He had 2 pictures, one where he was on the left, the other he was on the right. In the end he chose the right. 

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, AshVilla said:

 

Pic is clearly fake, Boris would be on the far right of the pic not the left.

Strangely enough most people who voted Conservative think Boris is too far Left.

The most interesting thing about the picture is the "genital framing" of his father - a classic dominance display.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, MakemineVanilla said:

Strangely enough most people who voted Conservative think Boris is too far Left.

Most people who voted Conservative have no concept of right or left in politics

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, Jareth said:

Which will make them ideal prospective voters for Keir Starmer's Labour

Sounds good.

Get all the "I'm not really political" people voting not Tory for a change, maybe they stop winning elections and we stop having a Government of thieves, fraudsters and sex offenders for a bit.

 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ml1dch said:

"We go now to our latest levelling up news..."

 

I'm sure Brummies and our friends in Blackpool would be delighted to show her how lovely our cities are. She can see it from the stake she'll be tied to, before the smoke inhalation gets the word removed.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Chindie said:

our friends in Blackpool would be delighted to show her how lovely our cities are

Blackpool is, unfortunately, an absolute shithole. Nice people, terrible town. It’s not in any regard “lovely” in my experience of 30 years up here.  I’d love that to change, but tories ain’t gonna be the ones to do it.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, ml1dch said:

Sounds good.

Get all the "I'm not really political" people voting not Tory for a change, maybe they stop winning elections and we stop having a Government of thieves, fraudsters and sex offenders for a bit.

 

Thick people.  You mean thick people. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Wainy316 said:

Thick people.  You mean thick people. 

I actually don't. Personally I think everything would be better if every adult knew, and was interested in political principles, knew who their MP was, their history and positions, and had deep, well-reasoned ideas about all of it. But not being bothered doesn't make them thick. 

A theoretical physicist who isn't interested in by-election polling numbers isn't thick. Nor is an electrican who knows his way around a wiring system while I still don't completely understand why electricity doesn't leak out the sockets* and isn't bothered, but thinks he might pay a bit less tax by voting Tory. 

Get that guy not thinking that Tory is the default vote, and change things.

*I do really. I think.

 

Edited by ml1dch
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, ml1dch said:

I actually don't. Personally I think everything would be better if every adult knew, and was interested in political principles, knew who their MP was, their history and positions, and had deep, well-reasoned ideas about all of it. But not being bothered doesn't make them thick. 

A theoretical physicist who isn't interested in by-election polling numbers isn't thick. Nor is an electrican who knows his way around a wiring system while I still don't completely understand why electricity doesn't leak out the sockets* and isn't bothered, but thinks he might pay a bit less tax by voting Tory. 

Get that guy not thinking that Tory is the default vote, and change things.

*I do really. I think.

 

This will blow your mind 🤯

 

 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, bickster said:

Most people who voted Conservative have no concept of right or left in politics

It seems uncertain whether either side of the Left-Right divide understand the present political realities.

The left dream of a return to socialism and the right dread that it might happen, but Thatcher ended all hope of socialism when she sold off the council houses, and introduced student loans. Blair continued in the same direction.

In short, the individual citizen's relations to Capital has been entrenched.

The policies which allowed a generation to live in a socialist bubble, should they choose, have been replaced by critical race theory and the culture wars, and the dominance of the interests of Capital has increased.

Many people of the boomer generation, were born in an NHS hospital, lived in a council house, had a free university education, plus student grants, and went on to work their whole life in government instutions or state-owned enterprises, and now enjoy pensions underwritten by the state.

In short, they have lived in a socialist bubble all their lives.

They didn't have their surplus value confiscated by the capitalist, which in effect meant that they did not belong to the proletariat, by Marx's own definition.

I can't see that as possible for either present or future generations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, MakemineVanilla said:

It seems uncertain whether either side of the Left-Right divide understand the present political realities.

The left dream of a return to socialism and the right dread that it might happen, but Thatcher ended all hope of socialism when she sold off the council houses, and introduced student loans. Blair continued in the same direction.

In short, the individual citizen's relations to Capital has been entrenched.

The policies which allowed a generation to live in a socialist bubble, should they choose, have been replaced by critical race theory and the culture wars, and the dominance of the interests of Capital has increased.

Many people of the boomer generation, were born in an NHS hospital, lived in a council house, had a free university education, plus student grants, and went on to work their whole life in government instutions or state-owned enterprises, and now enjoy pensions underwritten by the state.

In short, they have lived in a socialist bubble all their lives.

They didn't have their surplus value confiscated by the capitalist, which in effect meant that they did not belong to the proletariat, by Marx's own definition.

I can't see that as possible for either present or future generations.

 

That it happened once, is all the proof you need that it can happen again.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...

exclamation-mark-man-user-icon-with-png-and-vector-format-227727.png

Ad Blocker Detected

This site is paid for by ad revenue, please disable your ad blocking software for the site.

Â