Jump to content

The banker loving, baby-eating Tory party thread (regenerated)


blandy

Recommended Posts

The thing that I don’t understand is that there’s several hundred thousand vacancies in the NHS so you’d assume budget exists for hundreds of millions of headcount.

Why not pay the people who are doing the work of more than 1 person a fair salary from that budget?

They aren’t filling the roles any time soon, in fact they’ll need more and more people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

just a normal day. A sitting MP publicly abusing a member of the public for *checks notes* thanking the Samaritans for helping her with a mental health issue. 

  • Shocked 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, StefanAVFC said:

just a normal day. A sitting MP publicly abusing a member of the public for *checks notes* thanking the Samaritans for helping her with a mental health issue. 

Absolutely disgusting. If you're still voting for these absolute scumbags then you seriously need to take a hard look at yourself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, StefanAVFC said:

just a normal day. A sitting MP publicly abusing a member of the public for *checks notes* thanking the Samaritans for helping her with a mental health issue. 

I almost posted a ‘shocked‘ emoji / reaction but actually, this coming from a Tory MP is anything but shocking.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Genie said:

How can he feel so comfortable that he can post like that on Twitter. 

Because we've seen here and in the states that being a vile heartless c*** is no longer a barrier to public office. In fact it is a way to get undying support from certain elements of society.

Edited by HKP90
Typo
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, The Fun Factory said:

Hasn't there been a bit of an issue in selecting the candidate as everyone thought it was going to be Shaun Bailey?

I fully expect some throbbed to want Johnson to run again.

Don't think anyone expected it to be Bailey. 

The issue they had is that they think Bailey outperformed expectations last time because nobody knew who he was, so they could turn into a Khan "yes or no" question rather than a comparison of two candidates. 

They've very deliberately chosen candidates that they can do the same with - hence why Paul Scully, Minister for London was kept off the shortlist - because people know who he is (and wanted to avoid another by-election).

At least Daniel Korski will have name recognition now. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is pretty incredible 

Quote

It could cost an estimated £63,000 more to send a migrant to a "safe country" such as Rwanda than to keep them in the UK, the government has said.

An economic impact assessment of the Illegal Migration Bill, which is going through Parliament, found a gross cost of £169,000 to relocate an individual.

But the estimated £106,000 spent on housing support if they remained in the UK would be avoided.

The government said the policy would also have a deterrent impact.

However, the Home Office assessment said it was "uncertain" what level of deterrence impact it would have because the bill was "novel and untested".

link

It’s funny how the money tree still exists for certain projects.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Covid enquiry featuring Matt Hancock is interesting. 

Quote

"The central failure that hampered the UK's response was the refusal and the explicit decision that it would not be possible to halt the spread of a new pandemic," he says.

"That is wrong. That is at the centre of the failure of preparation."

He continues: "All of the other considerations are small - important but small, compared with the colossal scale of failure in the assumption that it would not be possible... to stop the spread of a disease."

"It's an absolute tragedy," he concludes.

It certainly felt that way at the time, and the massive reluctance to do lockdowns etc preferring to “let the bodies pile high”.

link

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, StefanAVFC said:

just a normal day. A sitting MP publicly abusing a member of the public for *checks notes* thanking the Samaritans for helping her with a mental health issue. 

He's doubling down on it too - surely he doesn't survive this? 😐 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, bobzy said:

He's doubling down on it too - surely he doesn't survive this? 😐 

There's nothing to really "survive". He's not in the Government so there's no position to sack him from. And they're not going to withdrawn the whip from every MP that acts like a bell-end on Twitter. 

He'll probably be voted out at the next election, so he doesn't "survive" long term. But there's nothing to really be done about it at the moment.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, bobzy said:

He's doubling down on it too - surely he doesn't survive this? 😐 

Accusing her of anti-seminism because she made fun of Gullis in a picture where he's signing something to do with the Holocaust.

Absolutely shameless.

One is a commenter on Twitter, the other is a sitting MP.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...

exclamation-mark-man-user-icon-with-png-and-vector-format-227727.png

Ad Blocker Detected

This site is paid for by ad revenue, please disable your ad blocking software for the site.

Â