Genie Posted May 23, 2022 Share Posted May 23, 2022 All along BJ has been confident this report does not sink him. He almost smugly tells people over and over to wait for the report. He knows what’s in it, and knows it’s not enough to force him to quit, or be pushed out by the party. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bickster Posted May 23, 2022 Moderator Share Posted May 23, 2022 16 minutes ago, The Fun Factory said: There is no way Gray should have been anywhere near no 10 and bunter during the investigation. She should have refused immediately and if they pushed back, leak to the press. She wasn't. This meeting is supposedly after the investigation had finished Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theboyangel Posted May 23, 2022 Share Posted May 23, 2022 1 hour ago, bickster said: She wasn't. This meeting is supposedly after the investigation had finished But before her report was rewritten 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Genie Posted May 23, 2022 Share Posted May 23, 2022 2 minutes ago, theboyangel said: But before her report was rewritten There was a story over the weekend saying that Sue Gray was “finalising” her report. I thought it was written up ready for publication weeks ago. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bickster Posted May 23, 2022 Moderator Share Posted May 23, 2022 13 minutes ago, Genie said: There was a story over the weekend saying that Sue Gray was “finalising” her report. I thought it was written up ready for publication weeks ago. Modern journalist using sloppy language I'd imagine She's probably only been covering the folder it's in with wallpaper for extra house points 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Genie Posted May 23, 2022 Share Posted May 23, 2022 7 minutes ago, bickster said: Modern journalist using sloppy language I'd imagine She's probably only been covering the folder it's in with wallpaper for extra house points If she uses Boris’ flat wallpaper it’ll need it own security guard. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post ml1dch Posted May 23, 2022 Popular Post Share Posted May 23, 2022 1 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meregreen Posted May 23, 2022 Share Posted May 23, 2022 Tories already instigating a smear campaign against Gray. They’re so bloody predictable. Their enablers in the right wing press in collusion with this. Claim she’s too political. Jesus wept, she’s investigating politicians, including the Prime Minister and Chancellor, regarding breaking the law while in the political centre of the nation. What do they expect her to comment on, the colour of Bojos socks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bickster Posted May 23, 2022 Moderator Share Posted May 23, 2022 11 minutes ago, meregreen said: What do they expect her to comment on, the colour of Bojos socks. Could be relevant... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Genie Posted May 23, 2022 Share Posted May 23, 2022 21 minutes ago, ml1dch said: Is this one of the parties the Met didn’t punish him for? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Genie Posted May 23, 2022 Share Posted May 23, 2022 22 minutes ago, ml1dch said: “correct guidance followed at all times” Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ml1dch Posted May 23, 2022 Share Posted May 23, 2022 Just now, Genie said: Is this one of the parties the Met didn’t punish him for? Yup. The three guys on the left are all breaking the law. The guy on the right isn't. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bickster Posted May 23, 2022 Moderator Share Posted May 23, 2022 2 minutes ago, ml1dch said: Yup. The three guys on the left are all breaking the law. The guy on the right isn't. There's at least 6 non-Johnsons in that picture Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Genie Posted May 23, 2022 Share Posted May 23, 2022 2 minutes ago, ml1dch said: Yup. The three guys on the left are all breaking the law. The guy on the right isn't. Great, so The Met weren’t happy to have **** up enforcing the law at the time, they have also **** up the investigation now too. So presumably we’ll now have an investigation into the investigation of lockdown breaches? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
markavfc40 Posted May 23, 2022 Share Posted May 23, 2022 26 minutes ago, ml1dch said: That photo, and the other three that ITV have released, are from November 13th 2020. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fun Factory Posted May 23, 2022 Share Posted May 23, 2022 It almost shows that the met investigation is a complete white wash to try and keep the PM in power. Dom behind the leak perchance? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davkaus Posted May 23, 2022 Share Posted May 23, 2022 Let's see what lengths Tory MPs and the usual suspects are ready to bend over backwards to defend this liar once more. It looks like "they're all the same" isn't quite working with Starmer's beer, so it might be time for "we're bored of this continuous lying, illegality, and contempt for parliament, let's move on, war in Ukraine, etc". 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Genie Posted May 23, 2022 Share Posted May 23, 2022 Boris won’t leave because he doesn’t have a shred of decency. It’s time for him to be ousted from within (a cannon preferably). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bickster Posted May 23, 2022 Moderator Share Posted May 23, 2022 That Labour question is badly worded "Can the Prime Minister tell the House of Commons if there was a party in 10 Downing Street on 13th November..." He answered. No. i.e. no he can't tell the House They'll have to do better than that (and there are many many many better examples of him lying to the House) 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Genie Posted May 23, 2022 Share Posted May 23, 2022 1 minute ago, bickster said: That Labour question is badly worded "Can the Prime Minister tell the House of Commons if there was a party in 10 Downing Street on 13th November..." He answered. No. i.e. no he can't tell the House They'll have to do better than that (and there are many many many better examples of him lying to the House) tbf, the charge is “misleading” the house. He has mislead them for sure. Lying is a little harder to prove as you’ve stated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts