CVByrne Posted July 20, 2007 Share Posted July 20, 2007 I think Gabby will be a better forward for Villa. BUT I think Luke has more talent to be a true goal scorer, hence why I think Luke should be given a shot to prove himself. Yes Gabby is faster, yes he had a better season, yes I love the kid to bits. BUT, There is more scoring potential in Luke. He just has the eye for goal. I think if given the shot up front this season he'll do very well, the kid has talent and I think it'll show. Thats why I'm so against the signing of Defoe or anyone else, I think Moore deserves the chance to show what he can do, and I think he will. Go on Luke, bank in 10 or 12. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pablopicasso Posted July 20, 2007 Share Posted July 20, 2007 luke is the better player in my eyes... but gabby is a great prospect.... hope we keep both for the future... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LT_1993 Posted July 20, 2007 Share Posted July 20, 2007 Gabby but very very close Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jez Posted July 20, 2007 Share Posted July 20, 2007 Luke When Gabby learns to dribble,pass and cross he will be better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
b6bloke Posted July 20, 2007 Share Posted July 20, 2007 Luke is a better finisher Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JulieB Posted July 20, 2007 Share Posted July 20, 2007 Luke is a better finisher Seconded! But Gabby is an awesome force when he gets going no two ways about it. We're lucky to have the pair of them fighting it out to get in the first team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NurembergVillan Posted July 20, 2007 Moderator Share Posted July 20, 2007 Gabby for me. I just love players with raw pace, and he's breathtakingly quick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pelle Posted July 20, 2007 Share Posted July 20, 2007 A very close call. But I think Luke will be the better player in the end. If we keep them both I can see them form a great, very lethal partnership in a couple of years. Even if they're not any giants. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trinity-Tom Posted July 20, 2007 Share Posted July 20, 2007 Luke is the better player but Gabby could overtake him if he continues to improve. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nrogers Posted July 20, 2007 Share Posted July 20, 2007 Gabby, no question! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
V111A Posted July 20, 2007 Share Posted July 20, 2007 everyone always says how good luke moore is and i fail to see it, i find him lazy at times and if i were a defenderi would definatly prefer to play against him than the pure pace of gabby.. Therefore its Gabby for me!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LukeMoore Posted July 20, 2007 Share Posted July 20, 2007 luke has the better technical ability and is the better finisher gabby causes major problems with his pace and is a decent finished i'd have to go with luke right now how great is it to have these two kids in our team Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kkr Posted July 20, 2007 Share Posted July 20, 2007 Gabby. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sonic_bouma Posted July 20, 2007 Share Posted July 20, 2007 Gabby is just such a massive threat with his pace you almost cant leave him out.... luke is better technically im just glad we have both of them! they are quality young players Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nrogers Posted July 20, 2007 Share Posted July 20, 2007 Gabby is far superior to Moore! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tricella Posted July 20, 2007 Share Posted July 20, 2007 Luke When Gabby learns to dribble,pass and cross he will be better. 100% accurate....this was his weakest skills shown last season. He has a good eye for positioning and he is very pacy...but he lacks very much in dribbling, passing and crossing. He seems very easy for defenders to expose and read. Luke Moore is in my eye more a lethal striker. I dont know if I can say he is a better dribbler or passer, but he doesnt play that way as Gabby does. Luke is more a player that shows his skills in the box or closely outside. His eye for goal is better than Gabbys... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gort Posted July 20, 2007 Share Posted July 20, 2007 Moore. Gabby is over-rated, a lot of times last season he struggled when he came up against a half decent left back and very rarely beat them and delievered any good crosses. He has no skill, he just hits it and runs and once the defender knows that he's easy to defend against Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ml1dch Posted July 20, 2007 Share Posted July 20, 2007 Gabby is over-rated, a lot of times last season he struggled when he came up against a half decent left back and very rarely beat them and delievered any good crosses Well, thank Christ he's a striker not a winger then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1977 Posted July 20, 2007 Share Posted July 20, 2007 Gabby is much more dangerous and exciting to watch when in full flow. Luke is technically a better player and instinctive finisher. But if I had to say who will become the better and more successful of the two I would say Gabby. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LondonLax Posted July 20, 2007 Share Posted July 20, 2007 Gabby is far superior to Moore! In your opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts