foreveryoung Posted April 7, 2015 Share Posted April 7, 2015 He needs to prove we can create without Gil tonight. Sinclair out an no Gil looks like no goals to me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pacbuddies Posted April 7, 2015 Share Posted April 7, 2015 (edited) It's important to note that he hasn't failed yet. If his remit is to keep us up then we judge him at the end of the season. "Simple" as that. Judge his overall achievement then yes. But I don't see what's wrong with people passing some judgement on what we've already seen, good and bad. Nobody is saying he should be sacked now, which would be giving an overall judgement. I was replying to the 9 game is enough theory being purported. Totally agree with you. I have been critical of his use of 4-4-2 myself and his nativity against United in particular. Christmas already, Jesus where has the year gone! Edited April 7, 2015 by pacbuddies 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DCJonah Posted April 7, 2015 Share Posted April 7, 2015 We've scored 12 goals in 8 games without gil. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Condimentalist Posted April 7, 2015 Share Posted April 7, 2015 How is it bold? It's what Lambert picked but he starts Grealish instead of wiemann Given the form and fitness of various players, I think Richardson and Bacuna ahead of Lowton is bold, Vlaar ahead of Okore is bold and Grealish ahead of Gil/N'Zogbia is a huge call. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B94villa Posted April 7, 2015 Share Posted April 7, 2015 We've scored 12 goals in 8 games without gil. We could always use a few more. Our goal difference isn't exactly stellar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KSV Posted April 7, 2015 Share Posted April 7, 2015 How is it bold? It's what Lambert picked but he starts Grealish instead of wiemann Given the form and fitness of various players, I think Richardson and Bacuna ahead of Lowton is bold, Vlaar ahead of Okore is bold and Grealish ahead of Gil/N'Zogbia is a huge call. Yeah I guess but he's resting a few as we played a few days ago. I don't think it's too shocking. Leaving Gil out is bold. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
foreveryoung Posted April 7, 2015 Share Posted April 7, 2015 We've scored 12 goals in 8 games without gil. With Sinclair yeah! This team selection is old school Lambert. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danishlad Posted April 7, 2015 Share Posted April 7, 2015 The team selection is spot on. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stevo985 Posted April 7, 2015 VT Supporter Share Posted April 7, 2015 It's important to note that he hasn't failed yet. If his remit is to keep us up then we judge him at the end of the season. "Simple" as that. Judge his overall achievement then yes. But I don't see what's wrong with people passing some judgement on what we've already seen, good and bad. Nobody is saying he should be sacked now, which would be giving an overall judgement. Fair enough. What I've seen is a considerable improvement on the dismal football Lambert served up, and I think he'll keep us up. Change the word "considerable" to "slight" and I'd agree with your statement. The test will be whether Sherwood can keep up the improvement. i.e. is it more than a bounce. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zatman Posted April 7, 2015 Share Posted April 7, 2015 I can see improvement that could be long term. For a start he has the big name experienced attacking players like Agbonlahor, Benteke, Delph and Cleverley all on song and looking threatening and more important looking happier than they did under previous regime Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRO Posted April 7, 2015 Share Posted April 7, 2015 I would say measurable, which is somewhere between slight and considerable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRO Posted April 7, 2015 Share Posted April 7, 2015 I think he has that many players with a soft underbelly....he doesn't, know which ones to play to get any kind of fight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rodders0223 Posted April 7, 2015 Share Posted April 7, 2015 Ramsey changed it. Sherwood didn't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B94villa Posted April 7, 2015 Share Posted April 7, 2015 Ramsey changed it. Sherwood didn't. Nail. Head Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ozvilla28 Posted April 7, 2015 Share Posted April 7, 2015 Out coached in the second half and he had no ideas.QPR attacked Richardson and he was getting killed on that side and he should have changed it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sexbelowsound Posted April 7, 2015 Share Posted April 7, 2015 He seems to manage the same way I play Football Manager. Choose my tactic and stick to it rigidly throughout the game even if i'm not doing well. The difference is, If it goes tits up for me I can just reload the game If I need to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ozvilla28 Posted April 7, 2015 Share Posted April 7, 2015 Why on earth did he take Grelish he was nearly best on ground. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sexbelowsound Posted April 7, 2015 Share Posted April 7, 2015 Why on earth did he take Grelish he was nearly best on ground. Probably because he was practically crawling around the pitch by the end? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zatman Posted April 7, 2015 Share Posted April 7, 2015 Why on earth did he take Grelish he was nearly best on ground. he was shattered, 1st ever game at this level Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ozvilla28 Posted April 7, 2015 Share Posted April 7, 2015 Looked ok to me the kid looked all class. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts