ReasonforRevolution Posted October 20, 2015 Share Posted October 20, 2015 I agree with Stan. I fear I maybe a quiet minority reading this thread but I'd sooner have Sherwood than Monk, Rogers or Moyes.Monk has inherited a good side and is continuing a philosophy that was put in place dating back to Martinez. Who incidentally has turned us down a few times. Monks performances as of late isn't enough to be warranting a frenzy over his appointment.Rogers was outsmarted by 'Tactics Tim' in an FA Cup Semi Final and his ability to turn things around when the chips are down would concern me.Moyes is struggling in Spain. There is debate about his time at Man Utd and even Everton fans that have said they should of achieved more under his time. Not only this he was appointed in 2002. Things have changed since then.Sherwood got us out of a big mess last year. He has proven he can do it so I'd sooner back his corner. Much has been said about our net spend which was £8.25 million in the summer. This doesn't get you a decent keeper these days. Most teams would suffer losing Benteke, Delph and Cleverley let alone a team who scrapped past relegation. I think any of the names being branded around would only inherit the same problems and another 30 odd games down the line we would be here again. The heat has been turned up after the Chelsea game. A game that we should not of lost but a mistake by Guzan. Who I do believe Sherwood had earmarked as one of the first players to replace but funding wouldn't allow. I understand the frustrations! I haven't got my head in the sand, I see after watching them week after week we have been poor but I think a little more patience is needed. I really hope we can get a result Saturday and things turn around. For obvious reasons but also I'd like Sherwood to succeed as Villa manager. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nabby Posted October 20, 2015 Share Posted October 20, 2015 Well this now an utter shambles as if Collymore is binned for supporting Sherwood then it's clear the board are not behind Sherwood so why is he still in a job Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davkaus Posted October 20, 2015 Share Posted October 20, 2015 Seems a bit over the top, it was a fairly tame article. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post villa4europe Posted October 20, 2015 Popular Post Share Posted October 20, 2015 Well this now an utter shambles as if Collymore is binned for supporting Sherwood then it's clear the board are not behind Sherwood so why is he still in a job its not that he's supporting sherwood its that he's saying its not sherwoods fault that the club is being ran so poorly, ignore sherwood he's attacking the owner so its inevitable that he'd get the boot, but stan being stan he'll now spin it in to some half truths and injustice and then probably take to twitter and ban anyone who disagrees with him or even worse use talksport and only answer the phone to callers who back him up 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pacbuddies Posted October 20, 2015 Share Posted October 20, 2015 It's probably a blessing in disguise for Collymore as he would only have stressed about things. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davkaus Posted October 20, 2015 Share Posted October 20, 2015 To be honest, if his programme column was as hopeless as his article in the Birmingham Mail, it's not a great loss. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jon_c Posted October 20, 2015 Share Posted October 20, 2015 (edited) Maybe the club just finally realise Collymore is a clearing in the woods.Edit: really? I always thought the word filter for clearing in the woods, was something much worse. Edited October 20, 2015 by jon_c Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rodders0223 Posted October 20, 2015 Share Posted October 20, 2015 Stats= bollocks Please don't tell me we were paying Collymore to write a piece for us in the first place. Although, wasn't Ian Taylor binned last season from AVTV for his comments? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davkaus Posted October 20, 2015 Share Posted October 20, 2015 Now that Gabby has his club captain role, does he write a column? I can hardly imagine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
osmark86 Posted October 20, 2015 Share Posted October 20, 2015 Now that Gabby has his club captain role, does he write a column? I can hardly imagine. The Daily Agbonlah'Oracle. Insightful musings from the heart of the club. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dudevillaisnice Posted October 20, 2015 Share Posted October 20, 2015 Now that Gabby has his club captain role, does he write a column? I can hardly imagine. That would require him to know English. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Isa Posted October 20, 2015 Share Posted October 20, 2015 Obviously Collymore wasn't sidelined for supporting Sherwood, it was for criticising the club policy. He's just being the publicity-seeking bellend that he always is and milking it. Embarrassing that he was ever allowed to be involved with the club in an official capacity again anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeMcKenna Posted October 20, 2015 VT Supporter Share Posted October 20, 2015 Collymore really is very funny. He is on the money regarding the club ownership but totally wrong about Sherwood Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stevo985 Posted October 20, 2015 VT Supporter Share Posted October 20, 2015 You can't really blame the club can you?They're not going to put articles in the programme that criticises the way the club is being run. Wouldnt' surprise me if Collymore is being a bit generous with the truth too. He has a history of it.I imagine, for a start, that it's got nothing to do with his support of Sherwood. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zatman Posted October 20, 2015 Share Posted October 20, 2015 Count me out RE: Bradley. Too big a risk IMO - he's not managed at this sort of level before, certainly not at a club that resembles ours. We need experience, badly. I don't know if PL experience is going to count for that much. BB has had a pretty varied career, and obviously has a brain in his head. I think he'd cope about as well as anyone.I'd rather have Moyes in because he's been here and done it, but that can also be a bad thing. Everton will always be Moyes's PL club, whereas Villa could be Bradley's (assuming he's forgiven us for rather shoddy treatment of his son by McLeish).Saying that we might not have the option of getting either of them.It was Houllier not McLeish 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest av1 Posted October 20, 2015 Share Posted October 20, 2015 I'm not sure what Stan expected, you can't give your employer Pelter's on national radio and in the written press and expect to keep your job. Whether or not his views are correct or otherwise is irrelevant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Villarocker Posted October 20, 2015 Share Posted October 20, 2015 I agree with Stan. I fear I maybe a quiet minority reading this thread but I'd sooner have Sherwood than Monk, Rogers or Moyes.Monk has inherited a good side and is continuing a philosophy that was put in place dating back to Martinez. Who incidentally has turned us down a few times. Monks performances as of late isn't enough to be warranting a frenzy over his appointment.Rogers was outsmarted by 'Tactics Tim' in an FA Cup Semi Final and his ability to turn things around when the chips are down would concern me.Moyes is struggling in Spain. There is debate about his time at Man Utd and even Everton fans that have said they should of achieved more under his time. Not only this he was appointed in 2002. Things have changed since then.Sherwood got us out of a big mess last year. He has proven he can do it so I'd sooner back his corner. Much has been said about our net spend which was £8.25 million in the summer. This doesn't get you a decent keeper these days. Most teams would suffer losing Benteke, Delph and Cleverley let alone a team who scrapped past relegation. I think any of the names being branded around would only inherit the same problems and another 30 odd games down the line we would be here again. The heat has been turned up after the Chelsea game. A game that we should not of lost but a mistake by Guzan. Who I do believe Sherwood had earmarked as one of the first players to replace but funding wouldn't allow. I understand the frustrations! I haven't got my head in the sand, I see after watching them week after week we have been poor but I think a little more patience is needed. I really hope we can get a result Saturday and things turn around. For obvious reasons but also I'd like Sherwood to succeed as Villa manager.I am going to sit on the fence regarding Sherwood as I have said from the start of the season that he will need a certain amount of games to get to know his best team. I personally would like him to get that time and see where we are then but, I also don't see why the club are sticking with him if they gave him just two games to save his job. They might just as well sack him and get in someone new. I have a question for you though. If Swansea turn Villa over at the weekend, would you still see Sherwood as a better option than Monk? No hidden agenda behind my question, I am just wondering if a defeat would change your opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard Posted October 20, 2015 Share Posted October 20, 2015 1 more game left 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Demitri_C Posted October 20, 2015 Share Posted October 20, 2015 I'm not sure what Stan expected, you can't give your employer Pelter's on national radio and in the written press and expect to keep your job. Whether or not his views are correct or otherwise is irrelevant.He is untitled to his opinion.Its becoming a dictatorship now at Villa. Your not allowed an opinion. He is right we are a laughing stock and all the signs point to a club going down. Crap manager, board vs manager, manager critising players openly. team cant score. just negative atmosphere at the club. If Collymore isnt allowed to praise sherwood then why have they still got him in charge? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dounavilla Posted October 20, 2015 Share Posted October 20, 2015 Richard,- as in your opinion?- as in you know something ?-as in the recient speculation ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts