packoman Posted April 4, 2015 Share Posted April 4, 2015 I'm still confident that he'll keep us up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AshVilla Posted April 4, 2015 Share Posted April 4, 2015 QPR is the must win game Anything from today's game would have been a bonus tbh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sne Posted April 4, 2015 Share Posted April 4, 2015 Subs and starting lineups are beyond baffling 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DCJonah Posted April 4, 2015 Share Posted April 4, 2015 In 40 odd games we've beat man u 3 times. Sherwood out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dudevillaisnice Posted April 4, 2015 Share Posted April 4, 2015 Tuesday is an absolute must win game. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
abdomlahor Posted April 4, 2015 Share Posted April 4, 2015 Two in midfield again. Doesn't work, we needed more bodies in there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
foreveryoung Posted April 4, 2015 Share Posted April 4, 2015 Baker and then Cole??? Strange to make a defensive sub then a attacking sub. Goal was goal keeping error Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
penguin Posted April 4, 2015 Share Posted April 4, 2015 A loss seemed a near unanimous prediction pre-game, so not a lot's changed. Qpr winning is obviously hugely disappointing though. Difference in quality showed clearly as did their form, still created a few chances and kept them with touching distance. Tuesday is a monumental game. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobzy Posted April 4, 2015 Share Posted April 4, 2015 In 40 odd games we've beat man u 3 times. Sherwood out. For me, it's the same mistake that Lambert made against Arsenal - setting up to play high and attacking football against a strong side. I have no problem with it (we're in a poor position and need points) but many people criticised Lambert's approach at the time. It's been exactly the same from Sherwood. The better option would've been to defend deeper and try to nick a point, but "we go again" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DCJonah Posted April 4, 2015 Share Posted April 4, 2015 In 40 odd games we've beat man u 3 times. Sherwood out. For me, it's the same mistake that Lambert made against Arsenal - setting up to play high and attacking football against a strong side. I have no problem with it (we're in a poor position and need points) but many people criticised Lambert's approach at the time. It's been exactly the same from Sherwood. The better option would've been to defend deeper and try to nick a point, but "we go again" I thought although we picked an attacking side we were trying to defend and catch them on the break. Lambert was rightly criticised for many things and when Sherwood's had two years, built his squad and taken us to historic lows then he should get the same treatment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smetrov Posted April 4, 2015 Share Posted April 4, 2015 I don't mind who he picks, what formation he plays - just get those wins on the board. We've regressed the last couple of games - yes I know its utd - but we seemed not to compete... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobzy Posted April 4, 2015 Share Posted April 4, 2015 In 40 odd games we've beat man u 3 times. Sherwood out. For me, it's the same mistake that Lambert made against Arsenal - setting up to play high and attacking football against a strong side. I have no problem with it (we're in a poor position and need points) but many people criticised Lambert's approach at the time. It's been exactly the same from Sherwood. The better option would've been to defend deeper and try to nick a point, but "we go again" I thought although we picked an attacking side we were trying to defend and catch them on the break. Lambert was rightly criticised for many things and when Sherwood's had two years, built his squad and taken us to historic lows then he should get the same treatment. If you pick an attacking side, attack. Lambert was rightly criticised for many things and Sherwood is being rightly criticised for today. I have no problem with his approach or with him getting criticism. I just hope he sets the team out differently against Spurs and Man City away. We'll be getting 0 points from them if he doesn't. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StefanAVFC Posted April 4, 2015 VT Supporter Share Posted April 4, 2015 People who criticise sherwood aren't saying they want him out. He's not immune to criticism. Setting us up not to attack for 80 mins is criminal. Good last 10 though. And I liked his subs funnily enough. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
penguin Posted April 4, 2015 Share Posted April 4, 2015 I actually didn't the impression he set us up not to attack, we just couldn't get the ball off united. And when we did poor passing broke down moves. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
packoman Posted April 4, 2015 Share Posted April 4, 2015 Baker and then Cole??? Strange to make a defensive sub then a attacking sub. Goal was goal keeping error It wasn't really a defensive sub though. Baker went LB, Lowton to RB and Bacuna replaced Zog's position. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StefanAVFC Posted April 4, 2015 VT Supporter Share Posted April 4, 2015 We didn't have any width when their FB's are probably their weakest area. Carrick had all the time in the world because we didn't press past the half way line. Really disappointing. And I'm stuck in Manchester. Screw life. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimzk5 Posted April 4, 2015 Share Posted April 4, 2015 The only thing I found disappointing is the fact he said a few times we have nothing to fear going to OT and should play without fear Then plays a defensive lambert/McLeish team Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roonst83 Posted April 4, 2015 Share Posted April 4, 2015 He seems to think he can beat his chest and demand more effort and that alone will carry us over the finish line. Yet he shows great nativity in his selection, subsititutions and style of play. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
penguin Posted April 4, 2015 Share Posted April 4, 2015 What was unforgivable and more than likely a major contributor to their first goal, was leaving Hutton on the pitch when he clearly was struggling. They got far to much joy down the left in the first half. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rodders Posted April 4, 2015 Share Posted April 4, 2015 let's see how how he does against a QPR side with their tails up. A win is absolutely essential however it's gained, let's see of the cult of the personality has any use in that match. So far two wins against west brom ( the same west brom battered by shitty qpr) and a goddawful sunderland side who promptly parted with their manager are limited evidence of capability. it's close at the bottom tim, you may not have noticed, but playing players who are actually capable of creating and scoring goals might be a good idea. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts