Jump to content

Paul Lambert


limpid

Recommended Posts

I accept it is slightly counterfactual....but that is my opinion.

I'm not clear where I've mentioned Mourinho. Plenty of managers COULD have done better...but that is annequally counterfactual arguement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I accept it is slightly counterfactual....but that is my opinion.

I'm not clear where I've mentioned Mourinho. Plenty of managers COULD have done better...but that is annequally counterfactual arguement.

You said "I don't think fans are saying..." which means you were talking for others not just your own personal opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Imagine if Everton lost Lukaku for a majority of the season. Or Liverpool lost Suarez. We've had to compete without a fully-fit Benteke for most of the season. A serious injury to Okore meant a rotation of lesser centre backs so the defence was bound to be less settled. That was compounded when Vlaar was injured. A lot of teams would struggle in these areas if they had the injury problems we did.

 

Had our first-choice X1 been fully fit all season, we'd be in a healthier league position I'm sure.

Edited by The_Steve
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Imagine if Everton lost Lukaku for a majority of the season. Or Liverpool lost Suarez. We've had to compete without a fully-fit Benteke for most of the season. A serious injury to Okore meant a rotation of lesser centre backs so the defence was bound to be less settled. That was compounded when Vlaar was injured. A lot of teams would struggle in these areas if they had the injury problems we did.

Had our first-choice X1 been fully fit all season, we'd be in a healthier league position I'm sure.

I'm sure there will always be an excuse. If its not finances its injuries, if its not injuries its McLeish, if its not McLeish its players on high wages with bad attitudes, if its not that its all MONs fault.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Still not clear why that therefore means I agree with the ridiculous Mourinho comment.

Well because you made the unequivocal claim that fans aren't saying that Lambart is the best man for the job. The Mourinho one was a particular example but it ultimately derives from the openly stated sentiment of nearly all of the manager's apologists on here that no other manager could have managed better than Lambert.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

                  --Guzan--

 

--Lowton--Vlaar--Okore--Bertrand

 

--Bacuna--Westwood--Delph

 

--Gabby--Benteke--Weimann

 

I think that first XI is actually OK (with a couple of obviously weaker areas). It's a real shame we've not seen it at all this season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Still not clear why that therefore means I agree with the ridiculous Mourinho comment.

Well because you made the unequivocal claim that fans aren't saying that Lambart is the best man for the job. The Mourinho one was a particular example but it ultimately derives from the openly stated sentiment of nearly all of the manager's apologists on here that no other manager could have managed better than Lambert.

Thats because they're not. I'm not sure any sane rational Villa fan can say hand on heart Lambert is the BEST man for the job. What he is, is the current man WITH the job and given sacking him will mean 4 managers in 4 years I am yet to be convinced sacking him is the correct course of action. I believe he has done as well as fortune and finance have allowed him to do.

I also believe the players have let him down. ..not through lack of ability but lack of concentration and experience, only one of those Lambert has any direct influence over.

I think you have misunderstood my original comment or failing that o have been insufficiently clear...which I hope I have now remedied.

Its also massively unhelpful labelling other fans as "apologists" again I've not seen anyone apologising on Lambert's behalf for the situation more that they can see that not all the fault lies with him, that 2 years given the financial constraints is not enough time for him to build the squad he wants and that what the club needs is the fans support, a packed VP with an atmosphere to encourage the players and to abandon this rotten sense of entitlement that is a blight on this football club.

I won't have changed your mind, I don't expect to...you won't change mine....but at least maybe this can be discussed without the cheap insults, I'm a better fan than you point scoring and the pathetic abused dished out to manager and players alike via the internet.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't think there is a single team where the fans aren't saying that if only they avoided injuries to key players they'd be better off.

We might think we've been hit the hardest by injuries, but no doubt so does the fans of Arsenal, Swansea,Man U and ...  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I actually think Dunne, Collins, Bent etc.. would have done better than what we got, at least Dunne and Collins knows how to defend. Bent could be a nice impact sub to have. And NZogbia should be a regular first choice, miles better than Weimann, MILES better

 

We've been through this before, Lambert finished higher with the worst Villa squad ever (if you believe certain posters) than McLeish managed with a squad of experienced players. The club are better off now we've gotten rid of the negative influences and overpayed players. Hopefully, in the summer, we'll be rid of CNZ, Bent, Hutton and Given.

 

I'm not saying we should use all of our older players, but I do firmly believe that a good mix of experienced and young players is the best way to go. A too old side won't work "fulham" is a prime example, and a too young side wont work either "us". It's also a real shame we lost Petrov, our club is screaming for a leader in the midfield like that.

 

And also. People saying Weimann is a better player than the zog.. Haha give me a **** break, Weimann can't even do the basics with a football.

Edited by villalad21
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't think he would get the sack even if we don't reach the 40 point mark.

 

The board are just comfortable with the club in the premier league.

 

It will be interesting to see what will happen with this new contract he is supposedly offered though, I presume he will sign it.. the club will put out some PR; players will be told to back the manager etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't think there is a single team where the fans aren't saying that if only they avoided injuries to key players they'd be better off.

We might think we've been hit the hardest by injuries, but no doubt so does the fans of Arsenal, Swansea,Man U and ...  

It's pretty hard to deny that we've been hit particularly hard this season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyways. I might get some stick for this, but I'm not totally Lambert out yet, but it's close, really close. However, next season should be his last chance to show some improvement, these next transfer windows will be crucial for him and the team. If he fails to sign what we are screaming out for, a creative midfielder and a real leader in midfield, and add that to Okore's comeback, NZogbia back in form and matchfit, while Benteke hopefully is back in october. If Lambert still can't get this team to play some decent football next season, he should be gone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 I presume he will sign it..

 

To be honest if I was him I wouldn't sign it unless I knew for certain that there would be money to spend. Right now he is perceived to have done a decent job keeping us in the league and signing Benteke. If he stays at the club and has to keep buying cheap players then he's just making a rod for his own back. People will look at him and say that he hasn't progressed the team and that we are stagnant and he'll have no chance of getting a big job in management. (I don't count Celtic as a big job because it's not). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...
Â