DCJonah Posted December 26, 2014 Share Posted December 26, 2014 Wrong starting formation. Made the correct changes in the second half. That is a game we should have won. Need more creativity in this window. Over to you Randolph. I think its a bit of a cop out to lay lack of creativity at the owner. We're 2 and a half years into Lambert's reign, we should be better than we are in this respect and not have to rely on money to make it better. Here here, blame Lerner for Lambert's inadequacies. Was sbs blaming Lerner? I saw in his post that he is asking Lerner to open his chequebook this January. Strange series of posts. It implied that the only way to solve it is to spend more money. While I think the squad does need quality added to it I don't think lack of funds excuses just how poor an attacking team we are this season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sexbelowsound Posted December 26, 2014 Share Posted December 26, 2014 (edited) Wrong starting formation. Made the correct changes in the second half. That is a game we should have won. Need more creativity in this window. Over to you Randolph. I think its a bit of a cop out to lay lack of creativity at the owner. We're 2 and a half years into Lambert's reign, we should be better than we are in this respect and not have to rely on money to make it better. Here here, blame Lerner for Lambert's inadequacies. Was sbs blaming Lerner? I saw in his post that he is asking Lerner to open his chequebook this January. Strange series of posts. Asking Lerner to open his cheque book suggests that we need players that Lambert has failed to buy in 2 and a half years. In addition, our lack of goals means that we will be in a relegation battle. The amount scored is pathetic. Did we not create enough chances to win today though? I'm suggesting we need more creativity to help us create even more chances. God forbid we should want to improve our squad. Edited December 26, 2014 by sexbelowsound Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StefanAVFC Posted December 26, 2014 VT Supporter Share Posted December 26, 2014 Wrong starting formation. Made the correct changes in the second half. That is a game we should have won. Need more creativity in this window. Over to you Randolph. I think its a bit of a cop out to lay lack of creativity at the owner. We're 2 and a half years into Lambert's reign, we should be better than we are in this respect and not have to rely on money to make it better. Here here, blame Lerner for Lambert's inadequacies. Was sbs blaming Lerner? I saw in his post that he is asking Lerner to open his chequebook this January. Strange series of posts. Asking Lerner to open his cheque book suggests that we need players that Lambert has failed to buy in 2 and a half years. It does? Not for me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sexbelowsound Posted December 26, 2014 Share Posted December 26, 2014 Wrong starting formation. Made the correct changes in the second half. That is a game we should have won. Need more creativity in this window. Over to you Randolph. I think its a bit of a cop out to lay lack of creativity at the owner. We're 2 and a half years into Lambert's reign, we should be better than we are in this respect and not have to rely on money to make it better. Here here, blame Lerner for Lambert's inadequacies. Was sbs blaming Lerner? I saw in his post that he is asking Lerner to open his chequebook this January. Strange series of posts. It implied that the only way to solve it is to spend more money. While I think the squad does need quality added to it I don't think lack of funds excuses just how poor an attacking team we are this season. Bloody hell, I wasn't saying anything about the lack of funds! I simply suggested we need to sign some more creative players. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jacketspuds Posted December 26, 2014 Share Posted December 26, 2014 Wrong starting formation. Made the correct changes in the second half. That is a game we should have won. Need more creativity in this window. Over to you Randolph. I think its a bit of a cop out to lay lack of creativity at the owner. We're 2 and a half years into Lambert's reign, we should be better than we are in this respect and not have to rely on money to make it better. Here here, blame Lerner for Lambert's inadequacies. Was sbs blaming Lerner? I saw in his post that he is asking Lerner to open his chequebook this January. Strange series of posts. Asking Lerner to open his cheque book suggests that we need players that Lambert has failed to buy in 2 and a half years. In addition, our lack of goals means that we will be in a relegation battle. The amount scored is pathetic. It is but we are still 13th. I think we are a winger and ACM away from a top half side. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DCJonah Posted December 26, 2014 Share Posted December 26, 2014 I wouldn't disagree with that. Probably misread your post and took it a different way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sexbelowsound Posted December 26, 2014 Share Posted December 26, 2014 I wouldn't disagree with that. Probably misread your post and took it a different way. If that was in response to me then fair enough. No problem. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kurtsimonw Posted December 26, 2014 Share Posted December 26, 2014 Didn't mind the system from the start and did the right thing in changing it. Don't understand having Clark over Cissokho when you're behind though. Having Delph on the right made no sense at all either. Lambert wasn't at all to blame for the result though. Just one of those days. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StefanAVFC Posted December 26, 2014 VT Supporter Share Posted December 26, 2014 Isn't that nice lads 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sexbelowsound Posted December 26, 2014 Share Posted December 26, 2014 Isn't that nice lads **** off you word removed. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DCJonah Posted December 26, 2014 Share Posted December 26, 2014 I wouldn't disagree with that. Probably misread your post and took it a different way. If that was in response to me then fair enough. No problem. Yep, I took the post as excusing it with lack of funds. Apologies for jumping to the wrong conclusion. I think we desperately need wide players but Lambert just doesn't seem interested in signing or playing them. I really think it limits us so much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Dr_Pangloss Posted December 26, 2014 Popular Post Share Posted December 26, 2014 Need creativity, it's as simple as that, what we don't need is Tom Cleverley, any resources 'available' for Cleverley absolutely must be spent on someone with creativity. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DCJonah Posted December 26, 2014 Share Posted December 26, 2014 Didn't mind the system from the start and did the right thing in changing it. Don't understand having Clark over Cissokho when you're behind though. Having Delph on the right made no sense at all either. Lambert wasn't at all to blame for the result though. Just one of those days. Can't agree with it. Our lack of goals and quality in the final 3rd is down to the manager. He is partly responsible for that. If we were playing good attacking football and scoring loads he'd rightly get the credit, so IMO he has to take some of the blame when its such a clear issue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
foreveryoung Posted December 26, 2014 Share Posted December 26, 2014 I think us fans are becoming a little blind with the football now a little more entertaining. As progress goes, for me, there is none, 1 point from 9 is proof of this. surely. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StefanAVFC Posted December 26, 2014 VT Supporter Share Posted December 26, 2014 I think us fans are becoming a little blind with the football now a little more entertaining. As progress goes, for me, there is none, 1 point from 9 is proof of this. surely. Is this just a rephrasing of 'low expectations' again? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stevo985 Posted December 26, 2014 VT Supporter Share Posted December 26, 2014 Our passing is better, but the wet conditions showed Swansea's superior quality in that area in the first half. We couldn't control it properly and ended up panicky. They looked as if it wasn't raining. Disappointed with today. The lack of creativity is overwhelming. Doesn't matter if we shift to a more possession based approach. Until we can do something with it its fairly futile. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
briny_ear Posted December 26, 2014 Share Posted December 26, 2014 They looked as if it wasn't raining. That's because it always is raining in Swansea so they don't know any different. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sexbelowsound Posted December 26, 2014 Share Posted December 26, 2014 Our passing is better, but the wet conditions showed Swansea's superior quality in that area in the first half. We couldn't control it properly and ended up panicky. They looked as if it wasn't raining. Disappointed with today. The lack of creativity is overwhelming. Doesn't matter if we shift to a more possession based approach. Until we can do something with it its fairly futile. Agree with that. I think the fact that we are trying to pass it around now is promising. Also, we must remember that since we've adopted this style we haven't had the opportunity to add players better suited to it. February 1st should tell us more with regards to the new system. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DCJonah Posted December 26, 2014 Share Posted December 26, 2014 Our passing is better, but the wet conditions showed Swansea's superior quality in that area in the first half. We couldn't control it properly and ended up panicky. They looked as if it wasn't raining. Disappointed with today. The lack of creativity is overwhelming. Doesn't matter if we shift to a more possession based approach. Until we can do something with it its fairly futile. Agree with that. I think the fact that we are trying to pass it around now is promising. Also, we must remember that since we've adopted this style we haven't had the opportunity to add players better suited to it. February 1st should tell us more with regards to the new system. But this new system isn't some new innovative way of playing the game. We're passing a ball. Doesn't it show Lambert's limitations that after this long we struggle to do something so basic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobzy Posted December 26, 2014 Share Posted December 26, 2014 Our passing is better, but the wet conditions showed Swansea's superior quality in that area in the first half. We couldn't control it properly and ended up panicky. They looked as if it wasn't raining. Disappointed with today. The lack of creativity is overwhelming. Doesn't matter if we shift to a more possession based approach. Until we can do something with it its fairly futile. I think some of the lack of creativity today was down to the conditions - Swansea (a nice, fluid team) didn't create much either. I thought we played well today but actually lack quality when the ball came forward on the whole. We worked into some decent positions and controlled much of the game against a good side. Continued improvement for me - despite the result. Our passing is better, but the wet conditions showed Swansea's superior quality in that area in the first half. We couldn't control it properly and ended up panicky. They looked as if it wasn't raining. Disappointed with today. The lack of creativity is overwhelming. Doesn't matter if we shift to a more possession based approach. Until we can do something with it its fairly futile. Agree with that. I think the fact that we are trying to pass it around now is promising. Also, we must remember that since we've adopted this style we haven't had the opportunity to add players better suited to it. February 1st should tell us more with regards to the new system. But this new system isn't some new innovative way of playing the game. We're passing a ball. Doesn't it show Lambert's limitations that after this long we struggle to do something so basic. His limitations are that he'll try something new? As per usual - YAWN. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts