coda Posted September 12, 2015 Share Posted September 12, 2015 He's got to be taking the piss starting Mikel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zatman Posted September 12, 2015 Share Posted September 12, 2015 Must admit I was amazed this is their worst start in last 20 odd years, when they were finishing mid table or near bottom in the early years of Premier League, they never had as poor form as this?Chelsea havent finished outside top 6 for 20 years. They were more than a decent team before Abramovich Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VillaChris Posted September 13, 2015 Share Posted September 13, 2015 Yes I know but first four years of premier league I think (I hate the football started in 92 thing like most others but have to use it here) they didn't finish higher than 12th I think so surprised they've made a poorer start than those seasons. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OutByEaster? Posted September 13, 2015 Moderator Share Posted September 13, 2015 I like Mourinho, I think he's very clever in the way he goes about using distraction and the media, in the difference between how he is and how he appears and in the way he's able to organise a football team - but I don't half enjoy seeing him flounder. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zatman Posted September 13, 2015 Share Posted September 13, 2015 I wonder if they have started a relegation thread yet on Chelseatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VillaChris Posted September 13, 2015 Share Posted September 13, 2015 A few want him out....http://forums.cfcnet.co.uk/topic/55019-jose-mourinhos-second-spell/page-435Suppose it's all relative but would love to have their issues, will still comfortably get 60 + points. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChrisVillan Posted September 13, 2015 Share Posted September 13, 2015 I like Mourinho, I think he's very clever in the way he goes about using distraction and the media, in the difference between how he is and how he appears and in the way he's able to organise a football team - but I don't half enjoy seeing him flounder. I used to feel this way but at some point he managed to cross a line with me. I think it was when he started encroaching onto the pitch every week and disappearing before full time. Fortunately he doesn't look so clever anymore. The excuses and distraction aren't working. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theboyangel Posted September 13, 2015 Share Posted September 13, 2015 Bet Mourinho is already looking at the fixture calendar thinking, when do we play Villa! (17th October)It's refreshing to see him under pressure for once, the more upset he becomes, the more petulant and despisable he gets! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest av1 Posted September 13, 2015 Share Posted September 13, 2015 I'm absolutely sure he won't be in England next year, as José wants an open cheque book and Blanc under pressure at PSG, I'm tempted to place a few pennies on him rocking up in Paris next year. David Luis does not like this post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HanoiVillan Posted September 13, 2015 Share Posted September 13, 2015 Well that's a new one...it was the computers fault!True to form, it wasn't actually the computer's fault, but that of the "boy" who incorrectly set it up. I should think he's still doing laps of London in his underpants as we speak. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maqroll Posted October 26, 2015 Share Posted October 26, 2015 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seat68 Posted October 28, 2015 Share Posted October 28, 2015 That will silence the critics, a loss against Stoke, that'll learn em. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowychap Posted October 30, 2015 Share Posted October 30, 2015 Interesting. This could mean Mourinho hasn't a leg to stand on.Clickings Jose Mourinho's attack on two key members of Chelsea's medical staff was little more than one of many talking points in the aftermath of Chelsea's 2-2 draw with Swansea on the first day of the season.Doctor Eva Carneiro and physio Jon Fearn entered the field of play to treat Eden Hazard, thus ensuring Chelsea were momentarily down to nine men after the Belgian was forced to leave the pitch. Mourinho ranted on the sideline and then threw his medical team under the bus during the post match interview.It was classic Mourinho, anyone but his players were at fault for a poor result. It would be news for a day or two and then it would be on to the next thing that came out of the Chelsea manager's mouth but then the decision was taken to effectively demote Carneiro and things changed.If, as many have suggested, this is another example of Mourinho selecting a scapegoat to divert attention away from his players then he may well have gone too far this time. Carneiro hasn't been sacked but she will will no longer attend games, training sessions or enter the team hotel.The reason for this is that neither she nor Fearn understood the rules of the game according to Mourinho. Except, the problem with that is that they do.Footage of the incident has shown that referee Michael Oliver twice called for Chelsea's medical team to treat Hazard who appeared to be seriously injured. If Carneiro decides to follow a legal route on this, then this intervention from Oliver is all the proof she needs.According to the independent.co.uk, the General Medical Council guidelines mean that under these circumstances, Carneiro was obliged to enter the field of play regardless of what Mourinho thought about it.In light of this, if, as it appears, the club have gone along with Mourinho's assertion and demoted Carneiro, the Chelsea manager will have some serious questions to answer. From the beeb: Former Chelsea doctor Eva Carneiro's lawyers have served notice of a claim of constructive dismissal against the club, the Press Association reports.Legal papers have reportedly triggered a potential employment tribunal.Carneiro was dropped from first-team duties after boss Jose Mourinho said she was "naive" for treating Eden Hazard during a draw with Swansea. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Rev Posted October 30, 2015 Share Posted October 30, 2015 Must admit I was amazed this is their worst start in last 20 odd years, when they were finishing mid table or near bottom in the early years of Premier League, they never had as poor form as this? Chelsea havent finished outside top 6 for 20 years. They were more than a decent team before AbramovichBit late (guess it shows how often I check this thread) but of course before Abramovich came along Chelsea were bankrolled by another sugar daddy, one Matthew Harding. It was his money which paid for guys like Ruud Gullit, Gianluca Vialli and Gianfranco Zola to come to Stamford Bridge. It must be amazing to support a club who won the lottery, blew all the money and then won the lottery again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OutByEaster? Posted October 30, 2015 Moderator Share Posted October 30, 2015 Must admit I was amazed this is their worst start in last 20 odd years, when they were finishing mid table or near bottom in the early years of Premier League, they never had as poor form as this? Chelsea havent finished outside top 6 for 20 years. They were more than a decent team before Abramovich Bit late (guess it shows how often I check this thread) but of course before Abramovich came along Chelsea were bankrolled by another sugar daddy, one Matthew Harding. It was his money which paid for guys like Ruud Gullit, Gianluca Vialli and Gianfranco Zola to come to Stamford Bridge. It must be amazing to support a club who won the lottery, blew all the money and then won the lottery again. They were also a team that spent beyond their means to achieve success, I think what Bates and Harding did well was realise that there was a likelihood that things would change, so they gambled, they put the existence of the club on the line and created debts of £80m (I think) which at the time was enough to suggest that had their been no Abramovich there would have been no Chelsea. Their luck held. At the same time, we had a man who refused to let his staff get a coffee on expenses. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chindie Posted October 31, 2015 VT Supporter Share Posted October 31, 2015 Must admit I was amazed this is their worst start in last 20 odd years, when they were finishing mid table or near bottom in the early years of Premier League, they never had as poor form as this? Chelsea havent finished outside top 6 for 20 years. They were more than a decent team before Abramovich Bit late (guess it shows how often I check this thread) but of course before Abramovich came along Chelsea were bankrolled by another sugar daddy, one Matthew Harding. It was his money which paid for guys like Ruud Gullit, Gianluca Vialli and Gianfranco Zola to come to Stamford Bridge. It must be amazing to support a club who won the lottery, blew all the money and then won the lottery again. They were also a team that spent beyond their means to achieve success, I think what Bates and Harding did well was realise that there was a likelihood that things would change, so they gambled, they put the existence of the club on the line and created debts of £80m (I think) which at the time was enough to suggest that had their been no Abramovich there would have been no Chelsea. Their luck held. At the same time, we had a man who refused to let his staff get a coffee on expenses. Their luck is even tighter than that. There's long been a belief that Abramovich would walk away if Chelsea didn't qualify for the 2003 Champions League, which went to the final day of the season, and they didn't win convincingly either. Gronkjaer and the 'billion pound goal'.words removed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted October 31, 2015 Share Posted October 31, 2015 Must admit I was amazed this is their worst start in last 20 odd years, when they were finishing mid table or near bottom in the early years of Premier League, they never had as poor form as this? Chelsea havent finished outside top 6 for 20 years. They were more than a decent team before Abramovich Bit late (guess it shows how often I check this thread) but of course before Abramovich came along Chelsea were bankrolled by another sugar daddy, one Matthew Harding. It was his money which paid for guys like Ruud Gullit, Gianluca Vialli and Gianfranco Zola to come to Stamford Bridge. It must be amazing to support a club who won the lottery, blew all the money and then won the lottery again. They were also a team that spent beyond their means to achieve success, I think what Bates and Harding did well was realise that there was a likelihood that things would change, so they gambled, they put the existence of the club on the line and created debts of £80m (I think) which at the time was enough to suggest that had their been no Abramovich there would have been no Chelsea. Their luck held. At the same time, we had a man who refused to let his staff get a coffee on expenses. Their luck is even tighter than that. There's long been a belief that Abramovich would walk away if Chelsea didn't qualify for the 2003 Champions League, which went to the final day of the season, and they didn't win convincingly either. Gronkjaer and the 'billion pound goal'.words removed.We are the absolute opposite of them with luck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jacketspuds Posted October 31, 2015 Share Posted October 31, 2015 Bye Jose. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maqroll Posted October 31, 2015 Share Posted October 31, 2015 Hes done now shirley Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YGabbana Posted October 31, 2015 Share Posted October 31, 2015 They would be stupid to sack him imo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts