LondonLax Posted January 12, 2014 Share Posted January 12, 2014 I also agree. I don't like the rule but it is there and the ref got it wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rjw63 Posted January 12, 2014 Share Posted January 12, 2014 Damn, Joe walsh has scored an OG for the felchers. Life's (not) Been Good 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sonic_bouma Posted January 12, 2014 Share Posted January 12, 2014 Game over Newcastle can complain all they want and they have a right because the goal should have stood But they got about 4 major decisions in their favour against Stoke which were ridiculous. So to sum up I'm picturing a park with some roundabouts and swings on it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VillaForever1970 Posted January 12, 2014 Share Posted January 12, 2014 Pardew is quite simply a tit and always will be. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimzk5 Posted January 12, 2014 Share Posted January 12, 2014 Apparently pardews nickname is thrush because his an irritating word removed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jarpie Posted January 12, 2014 Share Posted January 12, 2014 Offside should be always offside when player is on offside, the current rule leaves too much in the vague territory. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Steve Posted January 12, 2014 Share Posted January 12, 2014 This was deserving of a red. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
samjp26 Posted January 12, 2014 Share Posted January 12, 2014 Is the rule to do with interfering with the ball or interfering with play, that is the question I guess? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
villa4europe Posted January 12, 2014 Share Posted January 12, 2014 both, the rules identify interfering with play (touching the ball) and interfering with an opponent (blocking their view or movement towards to the ball) that is what the ref has given IMO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
troon_villan Posted January 12, 2014 Share Posted January 12, 2014 Any gifs off the 'goal'? Never saw the game! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
villa4europe Posted January 12, 2014 Share Posted January 12, 2014 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NurembergVillan Posted January 12, 2014 Moderator Share Posted January 12, 2014 both, the rules identify interfering with play (touching the ball) and interfering with an opponent (blocking their view or movement towards to the ball) that is what the ref has given IMO Nobody had their movement toward the ball blocked though. Joe Hart's behaviour isn't impacted by any other player. He just watches the ball fly in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Steve Posted January 12, 2014 Share Posted January 12, 2014 Gouffran is ducking to avoid the ball. Certainly can see why they'd think he was active. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Steve Posted January 12, 2014 Share Posted January 12, 2014 Also, Joe Hart looks to see where Gouffran is standing before he dives, so he impacted on his ability to judge the flight of the ball. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PaulC Posted January 12, 2014 Share Posted January 12, 2014 If you're not interfering with play then you shouldn't be on the pitch. ;-P I hate the whole interfering with play rule, if you're standing in the penalty area then you're interfering with play, because defenders are thinking about where you are, you're influencing them and therefore the game. It's a stupid rule with such a big grey area things like that are always going to happen occasionally. yes but before they introduced that rule there were so many offside goals. It was introduced to favour the attacking players and as such its a good things. There are grey areas but that's what the ref is there for! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
villa4europe Posted January 12, 2014 Share Posted January 12, 2014 Also, Joe Hart looks to see where Gouffran is standing before he dives, so he impacted on his ability to judge the flight of the ball. This! not saying its definitely the case and im saying that hart wouldnt have saved that regardless but its a perfectly justifiable decision if the ref saw that as gouffran preventing Hart from diving towards the ball, he's hit that at 70mph+ at a guess, he's got a split second to make that decision the problem is the same as always, he wont come out and tell us what he saw Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
troon_villan Posted January 12, 2014 Share Posted January 12, 2014 Thanks villa4europe! Wowzers, that's a tough one to call in the heat of the moment. I can see why it was disallowed though, I was expecting something less obvious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AVFCforever1991 Posted January 12, 2014 Share Posted January 12, 2014 Shawcross is having a shocker... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr_Dogg Posted January 12, 2014 Share Posted January 12, 2014 Funny goal, Suarez was just waiting for the mistake. Sheer panic from Stoke. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PieFacE Posted January 12, 2014 VT Supporter Share Posted January 12, 2014 Shawcross and Adam are having shockers here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts