Meath_Villan Posted October 29, 2016 Share Posted October 29, 2016 Thing about twd is great first episode now switch off as it's going to be 4-5 episodes of filler or "character development dribble" before something happens to peak interest again 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hogso Posted October 29, 2016 Share Posted October 29, 2016 6 hours ago, Meath_Villan said: Thing about twd is great first episode now switch off as it's going to be 4-5 episodes of filler or "character development dribble" before something happens to peak interest again Often this is true, and it seems the next episode will be completely at odds with the first episode in tone, even trying to crack off some chucks. Which I guess some won't like. From light spoilers I've read though, episode 3 won't be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Demitri_C Posted October 29, 2016 Share Posted October 29, 2016 11 hours ago, villarocker said: TWD is the best show on TV imo. I dislike horror/gore movies but love this show because it drawers you in to how you would feel if you were the character on screen. It's clever TV and people who complain are clearings in the woods because they must know what to expect from the warning signs and opening credits. If you are scared or shocked - don't watch!!!! Exactly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Demitri_C Posted October 29, 2016 Share Posted October 29, 2016 2 hours ago, hogso said: Often this is true, and it seems the next episode will be completely at odds with the first episode in tone, even trying to crack off some chucks. Which I guess some won't like. From light spoilers I've read though, episode 3 won't be. Next episode I think rick and the group won't be in much or any of the episode at all. I expect will focus on Carole and Morgan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DCJonah Posted October 30, 2016 Share Posted October 30, 2016 On 29/10/2016 at 01:14, Meath_Villan said: Thing about twd is great first episode now switch off as it's going to be 4-5 episodes of filler or "character development dribble" before something happens to peak interest again Yep. It's a terrible show to watch week by week. But is actually decent if you can binge watch it. Still not as good as the comics. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Demitri_C Posted October 31, 2016 Share Posted October 31, 2016 Spoiler As expected a filler episode introducing us to the Kingdom, nothing really much of note just character development. All we know is that the Kingdom is giving Negans Saviours goods just like Ricks crew has to now. Makes me think the Alexandrians, Rooftop and the Kingdom will come together to take on the saviours. There is no other way to stop Saviours surely. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Designer1 Posted October 31, 2016 VT Supporter Share Posted October 31, 2016 Good episode. A little bit of much needed levity after last weeks opener, and McBride once again showing why she's by far the best actor working on the series. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Demitri_C Posted October 31, 2016 Share Posted October 31, 2016 I thought king ezekiel looks like a interesting character be interesting to see what direction they go with him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hogso Posted November 1, 2016 Share Posted November 1, 2016 Big 'zek is cool. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wazzap24 Posted November 1, 2016 Share Posted November 1, 2016 He's not as cool as his Tiger! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ponky Posted November 1, 2016 Share Posted November 1, 2016 That big Samoan bloke could do some damage with the axe I reckon! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mykeyb Posted November 1, 2016 Share Posted November 1, 2016 On 28/10/2016 at 12:52, troon_villan said: What sort of people complain about this sort of thing?? **** off OK chaps, genuine question to those who were happy with the level of graphic violence why is your opinion correct and those that complained are wrong? I thought it was needlessly graphic considering what was being done to who but thats as far as I would take it. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mykeyb Posted November 1, 2016 Share Posted November 1, 2016 On 29/10/2016 at 09:56, Demitri_C said: Next episode I think rick and the group won't be in much or any of the episode at all. I expect will focus on Carole and Morgan and next week looks like its mainly about Daryl. I can see from a production viewpoint it means they can work on more than one episode at a time but if it means it will be 3 weeks before we get back to Ricks gang it will reduce the impact of the first episode. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Demitri_C Posted November 1, 2016 Share Posted November 1, 2016 3 hours ago, mykeyb said: and next week looks like its mainly about Daryl. I can see from a production viewpoint it means they can work on more than one episode at a time but if it means it will be 3 weeks before we get back to Ricks gang it will reduce the impact of the first episode. I know it's bloody annoying, why can't they have parts of Daryl and then parts of rick. Really let's show down for me, they tend to let it drag for few filler episodes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sne Posted November 1, 2016 Share Posted November 1, 2016 I thought it was nice with a The Walking Dead / Calvin and Hobbes crossover episode 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hogso Posted November 1, 2016 Share Posted November 1, 2016 Daryl's episode was actually supposed to be episode 2, but they moved it to 3 as they thought the audience would need some light relief after the first episode. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Delphouneso Posted November 2, 2016 Share Posted November 2, 2016 9 hours ago, mykeyb said: OK chaps, genuine question to those who were happy with the level of graphic violence why is your opinion correct and those that complained are wrong? I thought it was needlessly graphic considering what was being done to who but thats as far as I would take it. I think from the show's perspective it needed to be that graphic in order to provoke a reaction from an audience that hasn't seen that character on screen for seven (?) months. Seven months is a long time in TV when you can binge watch an entire season of most shows in half a day. Also it's an iconic image from the comic. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mykeyb Posted November 3, 2016 Share Posted November 3, 2016 So it didn't really enhance the story but was just for shock value then?. The 4th episode is supposed to be 85 minutes long and is going back to Rick's group. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Demitri_C Posted November 7, 2016 Share Posted November 7, 2016 Not a bad episode considering it was mainly based about Dwights story and a background on Negan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
troon_villan Posted November 7, 2016 Share Posted November 7, 2016 Meh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts