I am really struggling to see the positives of us appointing McLeish if it happens, I have been wracking my brains to consider how to spin a positive light on affairs, but it's becoming increasingly difficult. He would sure up our defence that's for sure, but at the same time hinder our attack, something I'm not willing to accept.
However, I just can't see the logic in appointing McLeish, not at all. It goes against so much of what the club has promoted and portrayed under Lerners tenure, and until something concrete and official comes out of the club and the appointment is made I'm not going to jump on the bandwaggon and start slating Lerner at every opportunity, he has done so much good in his time here.
Until the day the appointment is made I will reserve my judgement and remain neutral, and lend my support to the board, and if the appointment is a questionable one, that is when I will become concerned.
UTV