Jump to content

CarryOnVilla

Established Member
  • Posts

    7,568
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    30

Everything posted by CarryOnVilla

  1. ShOUtHGaTE DoESn’T liKE oUr JaCk AS mUCh As We dO... tHiS iS NoT fAiR!!!!!!!!
  2. The possibilities for England’s attack. is mouthwatering. yes, that’s where I’m at, it appears Gareth wants runners. Everything about Southgate’s set up is safe. Safe passes, safe probing and and safe through balls for runners to pick up. but I suppose it’s the best he can do with the short time he has with the players. Yet, it’s so boring to watch. I swear watching his England play football is the most boring thing on earth. Even Sean Dyche would be nodding off watching that.
  3. Both brilliant players, I’d love to see them play together, if it’s possible. The reasons why jack hasn’t been picked before, is Probably the same reason why Maddison wasn’t picked this time or last time. (Unless he’s injured?)
  4. I’d say this is the mostly likely reality... also Jack is probably in the most competitive England squad there’s been in ages. Just look at the positions jack plays in. ALW, Sterling and Rashford. ACM, Maddison and MAsOn mOunT. All these players are good, real good. If we take our Villa caps off, and look at it objectively, it’s a hard choice. One positive from this situation is Jack’s desire to be part of the England set up has made him work harder and become a far more consistent performer.. it’s brilliant, if he keeps it up, he’s going to be increasingly undeniable.
  5. Probably Gareth wanting sterling or rashford in that position. judging from Ings placement, he wants 3 goal scores as the front 3 with jack being more midfieldy in style, it’s a headache for lil Gareth brain.
  6. I agree. southgate bashing was funny last month, now it’s just petulant. from both ITV and sky’s interviews it seems he’s impressed with Jack, but wants him more in offensive areas. Which I would agree with.
  7. Southgate’s Sky interview was a bit more kinder to jack, still had a criticism in it, “we need to find a way to get him more in them dangerous areas”
  8. sad to see wales losing. England have been shit, tactically going down the right and leaving jack out, good job that he switch sides and got that assist. Easy peach for Calvert-Lewin
  9. Click bait marketing 101... emotional reactions will get you more noticed than a smart analytical breakdown.
  10. Noooooooooooo!!! my emotions are going to be ripped to shreds... I’ll be happy to see him play some decent minutes.. but why against wales, He’s going to destroy us
  11. Probs king and/or Rico Henry but more likely no one
  12. being from wales I don’t give a shit if jack plays this one. Tbh I rather he didn’t, I don’t want him to break my heart
  13. Aha you got to where I was it was hoping to get to. Our recruiting for the academy has been great in this window. I just hope that we got a bunch of jacks coming through together.
  14. All transfers are a gamble... be it young or old. older players, what you get in the short term can bite you in the long term.. more prone injuries decline in performance and fat wages.. younger is what you said. the safest gamble is real long term and get great kids in to the academy... don’t cost a lot with fees and wages and have so much time to develop around the clubs philosophy and playing style. But the drawback is that’s probably a 5 year wait until they are ready... and that’s still an if they can... This method is good if you want to build a long term legacy team, such as peps Barcelona or fergies Man U.
  15. This is one of the main reasons why I’m not as keen on signing older players. They do a job for now, and it all looks good, but after a season or two, you’ll be getting diminishing returns. Just like the names above. the trick is getting players on the up, so we get more out of them, and for whatever reason we have to sell them, we can get some profit out of it too. like the Watkins vs Wilson debate. In terms to investment to the club and squad we are more likely getting a better return from ollie, he has better chances to be in the team longer and improving each season with us, which makes the club better and if the club chooses/needs to sell him, it will get a nicer return from him. However, Wilson is at his peak, and each season he is closer to regressing due to his age. So if that does happen, it only brings down his value, to his potential sell on fee and to the squad. how I would of seen each signing is in the terms of short term and long term. callum fixes the problems of now, such as ensuring safety ollie fixes the problem of building a challenging squad for the future. also, so far he looks like he’s fixing the problem of now too.. nice business villa
  16. here’s an interesting video about manure’s debt
  17. I hope to see in at least in one game this season jack and Ross in the middle. Linking up like iniesta and xavi. A dribbler who can pass with a passer who can dribble
×
×
  • Create New...

exclamation-mark-man-user-icon-with-png-and-vector-format-227727.png

Ad Blocker Detected

This site is paid for by ad revenue, please disable your ad blocking software for the site.

Â