Jump to content
Just visiting?

duke313

Established Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    9,629

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    15

 Content Type 

Everything posted by duke313

  1. duke313
    The transfers of Tim and Dobbin have already been confirmed by the Premier League, why would they investigate them after they already approved them? My guess is these articles about ‘fair market value’ are just “journalists “ doing their bidding by some big 6 team to create some noise about it.
  2. duke313
    Maybe V Sports have bought Everton
  3. duke313
    Anybody know if United, Arsenal and Spurs fans have gave the go ahead on this one? Better check with them just to be sure it’s allowed.
  4. duke313
    Some of these transfers are insane when you look at them
  5. duke313
    This is actually crazy, way worse than Kellyman and Tim
  6. duke313
    So, which of the cartel do we reckon is kicking up a fuss here? My guess would be United, as Everton are now compliant with PSR so don’t have to sell Branthwaite.
  7. duke313
    come on Newcastle…
  8. duke313

    Lamare Bogarde

    duke313 replied to lexicon's topic in Villa Talk

    City, Chelsea and Liverpool all do this. United are terrible at it for some reason despite claiming to have the best youth academy due to some players coming through 32 years ago.
  9. duke313
    Kayode seems a strange one considering Nedjelkovic is a similar age. We must be okay with PSR in July if we're signing players we don't need.
  10. duke313
    DCL to Newcastle is off. Looks like they've taken the cheque book off nice guy Eddie
  11. duke313
    I'd imagine your example is how they want PSR to operate. But the deal we're doing (particularly the Tim/Dobbins deal IMO) is the PSR equivalent of two teams playing for a draw so they both qualify for the next round.
  12. duke313
    The red cartel and City don't need to help each other as to not breach PSR and get a points deduction.
  13. duke313
    Neither club in your example need to do this for PSR purposes.
  14. duke313
    We would, £100m -10k = 99,990,000. If we sold a player for £100m and bought one of theirs for £100m, then we wouldn't.
  15. duke313
    Two transfers between the same clubs in the same window.
  16. duke313
    Possibly, but I think that deal is dead in the water too - Gallagher wants to stay, and Chelsea can relax on the PSR front after we've bought Maatsen from them.
  17. duke313
    That's what we though would happen with the proposal we put forward to increase the losses allowed under PSR, only two clubs voted for it.
  18. duke313
    You don't stop teams making transfers, as @MaVilla post details, you just stop the teams from booking the money received from these deals as profit under PSR.
  19. duke313
    So who is Fiorentina getting in return? Donck? Moreno? Carlos?
  20. duke313
    What are you on about taking sides I never at any point said I was against us doing this, I merely suggested that it will be closed, just like the selling the stadium sale you mentioned, just like chelseas 8 year contracts, this too will be closed if teams are exploiting it.
  21. duke313
    If you say so
  22. duke313
    They aren't that common. And these technically aren't player swaps, we're booking the fee out and fee in separately.
  23. duke313
    This would help, but the last proposal we had was shot down so wouldn;'t hold out much hope
  24. duke313
    Yep, I think they'll try and introduce that. Then when teams find a way round it again it will just be binned off.
  25. duke313
    More moving parts, more things can go wrong. All it would take is one team pulling out to screw one of the over.
×
×
  • Create New...

exclamation-mark-man-user-icon-with-png-and-vector-format-227727.png

Ad Blocker Detected

This site is paid for by ad revenue, please disable your ad blocking software for the site.

Disabled
Not Now

Â