Jump to content

duke313

Established Member
  • Posts

    8,756
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    15

Everything posted by duke313

  1. How many would they have scored playing for City if they were told to cut in every time and pass to the left back?
  2. They don't have to, they can continue to spend what they ado now, this just allows for more loses.
  3. I assume the two in favour was us and Newcastle?
  4. I guess the rest of the PL teams are happy finishing mid table and selling their best players every other season to the Scum 6.
  5. Comment was about quality, it was about competitiveness
  6. I've figured out a way to fix our PSR issues, it's really quite simple. We sell Omar Kedr back to ZED FC for £100m...
  7. Not if the reports that we have to sell someone by the end of June it isn't, beggars can't be choosers.
  8. Couldn't we just "sell him" to Vitoria and loan him back with an obligation to buy. City can get away with selling Savio to Troyes (who never played a single game for them and they've been relegated) and was loaned out to Girona. This is why PSR is complete bollocks, we're punished for having ambition. You don't see Liverpool or Arsenal having to sell Salah or Odegaard.
  9. City have won 6 of last 7 PL titles, PSG have won 6 of last 7 L1 titles
  10. As opposed to the superiority of Luton, Sheff Utd and the mighty Burnley.
  11. I'm sure Emery could sort that out But yes, context needed as it's in a lesser league, still looks a player though.
  12. There was no Ndidi link, he was only suggested because he's available on a free.
  13. How can you enforce someone earning money outside of football, i'm pretty sure that would be illegal in most countries.
  14. They can, the player would just get lucrative sponsorship deals outside of football to sign for certain clubs.
  15. I assumed you were talking about City wanting FFP scrapped? Which would mean clubs could just spend what they want? Which is presumably why we (allegedly) are supporting them, so we can spend what we want?
  16. This. People think a salary cap will solve all the issues. Players would just get massive sponsorship incentives outside of football to sign for this club or that.
  17. Typo, I should have wrote we ‘wouldn’t’ need to inflate sponsorship.
  18. We would need to inflate sponsorship if the rule was removed, our owners could just spend their own money, which the rule is currently preventing.
  19. City's owners don't care how much they spend, i'd imagine ours do.
  20. They do anyway, one of them has won 6 of the last 7 league titles
×
×
  • Create New...
Â