I disagree. If we were in the market for a new number 2 keeper, it would mean 2 things.
We are looking for a keeper
Olsen is looking for a new club
Either one or both of those two pieces of information would have gotten out to the media, none have.
Another thing to note, is that most of Olsen's games under Emery came in the first month or so of his tenure, when the whole team was unadjusted to the new style of play. He's had months of coaching since then.
I'd also add that there have been no links to any goalkeepers, if we were truly after a new number 2, there would be bullshit links a-plenty all over social media. No indication either that Olsen is seeking a move, so as long as he's here, we seemingly aren't in the market for a number 2 at this moment in time.
It depends what we’re asking the right back to do.
If it’s a traditional RB who gets forward, then Konsa isn’t the answer. If the RB is asked to stay back and form a back three, essentially a right sided CB, then he could be the answer.
Look at Stones and TAA, they’ve had no issue adapting to a new role/position.
Tielemams - 26
Pau Torres - 26
Moussa Diaby - 24
We’re signing players about to enter their peak years, rather than before they peak or after they peak. A game changer.
I'd be surprised if there wasn't a clause in his new contract, he would have had all the negotiating power when the club offered a new deal. But as some have said, it's probably for CL clubs to activate the clause, if there is one. So, he won't be going to Spurs anytime soon.