the list seems decent, only one that i would disagree with the most is KEA. If we had him right now, we would be several positions higher in the table IMO. IIRC he was the one who chased almost every ball and had bundles of energy.
the newest information has the state department trying to bribe the FBI to unclassify Clinton's emails. http://nypost.com/2016/10/17/state-department-brokered-deal-with-fbi-to-declassify-clinton-emails/
first time in a while that we've gone for an 'experienced' manager and i hope that it will work out well for both parties. I think that is something that we have lacked for a while.
its just one season and after the season, you will get a special Alex Hunter ultimate team card tailored to the ratings that you had received in the Journey.
i know, i mean that him, or someone of his elk- a younger manager- would get more time than Bruce or others. I would personally rather have a proven bruce than any one else(who would be attainable) other than Dyche. But thats just a pipe dream. Though I can't see Xia having a lot of patience with Bruce if we continue to struggle.
our appointment will show the thinking the Dr has about salvaging the season. If we go for Bruce, imo that means that Xia is backing him to lead us up this year. If he goes down the path of Wagner, then he is going for a longer-term approach. He would get more time than Bruce i would think. Not sure that clarke would be a good appointment anyways.
i think that there is some talent in him and would have him back here for the rest of the season. But we are missing a midfielder that is energetic and drives forward, and I don't think Veretout is the answer for that problem.
I think Bradley's appointment has to do with the fact that Landon Donovan is on their Board now(or some other position with the club). Think they are trying to tap into the American market