wiggyrichard

Could be a blessing in disguise mate. 2 of my best friends brought a house together, the amount of grief it caused them was unbelievable! 1 of them fell behind with payments etc. and caused a big rift. In the end, them selling it (loosing a good chunk of cash on it) was the only thing that saved their friendship. It wasnt only the money issue tho mate, when you socialise and live with someone it means you can pretty much spend 24hrs a day with them and its not always a good thing, you may end up wanting to tear their eyes out...thats what marriage is for! :winkold: If you're going to italicize a word Wiggs man, make sure you get it right! :winkold: I like to keep you on your toes! 8)

Naa...Keez Movies is far superior! xhamster for the trump card

Im so glad you said "a man" and not "a friend"!

Exactly Shillzz, you have to remeber its your house. If you rent to friends, they get the old ''Shillzz wont mind me throwing a party for 8 of my work mates...he usually goes dogging on a Friday night...'' sort of attitude. The respect for your property isnt there because after all...your a mate. *Just to clarify, i have no evidence to prove that Shillzz does go dogging on Friday nights.

Naa...Keez Movies is far superior!

Could be a blessing in disguise mate. 2 of my best friends brought a house together, the amount of grief it caused them was unbelievable! 1 of them fell behind with payments etc. and caused a big rift. In the end, them selling it (loosing a good chunk of cash on it) was the only thing that saved their friendship. It wasnt only the money issue tho mate, when you socialise and live with someone it means you can pretty much spend 24hrs a day with them and its not always a good thing, you may end up wanting to tear their eyes out...thats what marriage is for! :winkold:

How much compo do we think she can be looking forward to? £1m at least?

They are strange examples. If you watch Barca/Arsenal they would usually pass in the situation Gabby was in. In this instance he scored so no problem but play that scenario 100 times over 50 times he passes to Bent, 50 times he shoots. Now which scenario would result in the most goals? :winkold: It's a real pet-hate of mine I've even called Bannan out for it earlier in the season (and so did Mcleish). Arsenal built a dynasty on this extra pass concept, and still score plenty of goals with it. They also missed a shit load of chances by trying to walk it into the net. Is this all because Gabby had a pop at your beloved Mr. Houllier? Gabby is a striker, he gets paid to put the ball in the onion bag, thats exactly what he did, not sure what your problem is? If Gabby would have passed and Bent **** it up, you'd be going crazy at Gabby for not shooting! Sounds to me like your argueing for the hell of it!

Optimism suits you Richard. :winkold: Oh, and...i told you so!

Regardless of who is in charge (im in the McLeish fan clan), be it Ancelotti or whoever, this was only ever going to end in a defeat or a draw at the very best. 2-0 Man City, hey-ho, move on.

lol, we got one a few weeks back. Dogs are ace what sort you got ? Ya dogs are great, getting a springer spaniel. They are as mad as a bag of spanners! Never understood this, in what way is a bag of spanner's mad?

Think im going to give this a miss and go with PES 12 this year. What are people finding so frustrating? Whats the issue with defending?

Pretty much one of the most ridiculous posts I have read on here. It's certainly up there isnt it...

Do we know if Gabby was in line for a call up?

Ive had Gabby 1st to score and Villa to win 2-0 @ 28/1, first game this season ive had a good feeling about. 8)

Cheers Hogso, much appreciated!

Sorry to be a pain, but can someone explain the online game modes as im a BF virgin. Cheers.

Try it on beginners. :winkold:

Mischievious little bastard!

maybe certain events occur much the way the laws of physics prescribes that certain events occur and luck has nothing to do with it Maybe had they been going 5 mph slower the kid that leaps out into the road behind them would have copped it ..so by going faster they avoided him ?? Thats a joke...right? :? no ...the drink driving stat one was in case you missed it but this post was perfectly serious I'm just using the same flawed logic that you are At 10:25 fate decrees that little Johnny is going to jump out in the road for some reason and X marks the spot ... at 10:25 at 30 mph you will be at point X , at 10:25 at 35mph you are going to be at X+ Y Tony, its **** all to do with fate. The point is little Johnny has more chance of surviving if he is hit at 30mph than he has at 40mph. By the way, what flawed logic have i used? what chance has he got at 70mph? what chance has he got at 80mph? i dont see why little johnny has been brought into this, i happily go over the speed limit on the motorway, doesnt mean i do it outside schools The point is people making out that its ok to speed in residential areas becuse they have superior skills behind the wheel, that they can see round corners, see reflections in windows, slow down time etc.

maybe certain events occur much the way the laws of physics prescribes that certain events occur and luck has nothing to do with it Maybe had they been going 5 mph slower the kid that leaps out into the road behind them would have copped it ..so by going faster they avoided him ?? Thats a joke...right? :? no ...the drink driving stat one was in case you missed it but this post was perfectly serious I'm just using the same flawed logic that you are At 10:25 fate decrees that little Johnny is going to jump out in the road for some reason and X marks the spot ... at 10:25 at 30 mph you will be at point X , at 10:25 at 35mph you are going to be at X+ Y Tony, its **** all to do with fate. The point is little Johnny has more chance of surviving if he is hit at 30mph than he has at 40mph. By the way, what flawed logic have i used?

^ Whats that about? Looks interesting. edit: Yes, i know its about the war in Afganistan :winkold:

maybe certain events occur much the way the laws of physics prescribes that certain events occur and luck has nothing to do with it Maybe had they been going 5 mph slower the kid that leaps out into the road behind them would have copped it ..so by going faster they avoided him ?? Thats a joke...right? :?

I think most people are making the point that they like to drive fast on motorways and dual carriageways where there are kids unlikely to be hiding behind cars. Thats not what ive read in the last page or do. If ive read it wrong then i apologies.