No, we aren't.
In a variation on a phrase that should ring a bell, where do I say that?
No. They should held to account for the actions which they take (as should we all) and those who order them to do something should be held responsible for the directions they give.
On the 1st point, yes we are. With people like you screaming in the crowd about how you have rights and cant be man-handled out of the way when the police clearly have a job to do. As i said before, you dont want trouble stay at **** home. The business doesnt concern you, stay the **** at home. You have an underlying heart problem, stay the **** at home.
On the 2nd & 3rd point, you didnt say it and i never accused you of saying it, but you are trying to say that if Frank the pisshead with cronic heart problems gets asked to move on but refuses, gets shoved a little then keels over and pegs it then the police should be held responsible. Why should they? They are doing a job and Frank the pisshead is stopping them from doing their job, they were'nt to know. Shit happens.