Source document the Daily Heil, I suppose.
Immigration: long policy here. In brief, most migration is caused by people fleeing either conflict or environmental degradation (I suppose everyone accepts this is a fact, no?) and so the point is to address the root cause of migration rather than have batallions of robocops at Dover to repel the foreign hordes. In the medium term
Membership of organisations: the proposal is that people should be punished for what they do, not what they think. There was a time when I'd have thought that uncontroversial, and that pretty much everyone in a supposedly liberal society like the UK was against "thought crime".
Armed forces: Reducing the number of people in the armed forces has been cross-party policy for generations. It has reduced every year since 1952, I believe.
no, source document was the infamous interview with Andrew Neil, followed in my case, by a dig in to the harder to find parts of their website that cite policies
I know you can strongly criticise every party, that's a given. But these guys currently remind me of early 1980's Labour. Heart of gold, great intentions and very very easily made to look like fruitcakes.
You can't just ban all forms of energy and hope we invent something nice.
You can't disband the military and hope the rest of the world turns nice.
You can't have open door immigration, no banned organisations, £72 for everyone anywhere, no border control, and hope the rest of the world decides to stay home and leave us alone.
In an ideal world, the Green Party are the obvious and only choice. In a possibly slightly less than ideal world, they are the unreformed hippy dreamers of old that would absolutely destroy the living standards of our children.