lmarsha_926

We are still linked with Acorns

http://www.avfc.co.uk/page/ClubNewsDetail/0,,10265~2068264,00.html

I wonder if he could say if it is not FxPro

You watch it be something totally different then the names mentioned in this thread

Can someone do a mock kit with FxPro as the spoinsor as I cannot find a decent size logo.

Do they sponsor any other sports Team I am thinking it could be Santander as they have a simple logo

The rule as I understand it is they need 8 home grown players over the age of 21 in there 25 man squad. Under 21's do not have to be registered and Home Grown counts as any players being trained for more than 3 years in this country before they are 21.

14th August We will play on July 28th/29th if we finish 7

Better

I just siad what people siad in the last 2 post before mine.

Any ideas for sponsors

Could not the second one to look right because the shape of the logo.

I can make a vodaphone sponsored kit if you want. Any ideas on design

Just something I created, notice the sponsors who are a Indian travel firm and look back to Sunday. I could of made it better but the logo I found was too small.

I still think it was not a pen but I understand why it was given as the ball still went in the same direction as travel from the refs point of view Agbonlahor won it. However the rules state even if a defender wins the ball it is a foul if the player takes the man and that is the debate in this instance did Johnson intend to take Agbonlahor. They where far worse tackles outside the box during games that did not lead to free kicks. It was not an obvious mistake but it was a mistake thanks to that refs interpretation of the rules. On another day and another ref we may not of got the pen. I am not worried about ref making certain decision as long as they are consistent and as I said with worse tackles being committed with no punishment Martin Atkinson was not. Just look at the Portsmouth game last week both the pen we did not have when Vanden Borre fouled Agbonlahor was a pen but was not given and then the pen we did get was in between the Johnson and Vanden Boore tackles. We got pens for the less obvious pens but did not get one for the most obvious decision.

25-Apr-10 - Aston Villa 1 - 0 Birmingham City 13-Sep-09 - Birmingham City 0 - 1 Aston Villa 20-Apr-08 - Aston Villa 5 - 1 Birmingham City 11-Nov-07 - Birmingham City 1 - 2 Aston Villa 16-Apr-06 - Aston Villa 3 - 1 Birmingham City 16-Oct-05 - Birmingham City 0 - 1 Aston Villa

Chelsea had 18 shots on target against Stoke and scored 7. Blues had 14 and did not score, You cant win unless you score simple as that.

shows we are harder to beat, next season we can bluid on that by winning more games.

For People who say we dominated the game and we should of won by 5 or 6, we only had more possesion than them they had more shots and corners than us. Possession * Portsmouth 45% * Aston Villa 55% Attempts on target * Portsmouth 12 * Aston Villa 9 Attempts off target * Portsmouth 4 * Aston Villa 3 Corners # Portsmouth 7 # Aston Villa 6

Portsmouth beat Spurs last week or have just beaten Chelsea and Arsenal.

At this stage teams need to win games, look at United yesterday did not play well but got 3 points. We can play better but at this stage I dont care as long as we win.

Just shows we dont tire after 60 minutes ok they got a goal but we can back twice in the last 20 minutes against a good Everton side. Top 6 finish will be good espeically as it means finishing ahead of Liverpool, who would of siad that at the start of the season. You have to remember how much City have spent and we are still aroud the Top 6. We need 8 points from 5 games to beat last years 62 points.

Unlucky Downing

I would not say we tired the last goas came on the conter when we trying to score. Up to 88 minutes they only had 1 real chance and they scored it, we kept them at bay for most of it. Even if one of the decisons went our way it could of made a differenece as instead of it being 1-0 after 70 minutes. It could have been 1-1 with 11 vs 11 1-0 to Chelsea with Chelsea having 10 men But it should of been 1-1 with Chelsea having 10 men, Alos it could of been 9 becuase Mikel or Deco could of been sent off. Chelsea might not of scored if we had taken the lead.