The article references evidence - it's not "this is my opinion, unsupported by anything else".
Do you find the evidence flawed?
Are you more convinced by other arguments which draw on different evidence, and if so, which?
Hopefully you haven't simply dismissed the argument because you don't like the person putting it forward.
The article references evidence - it's not "this is my opinion, unsupported by anything else".
Do you find the evidence flawed?
Are you more convinced by other arguments which draw on different evidence, and if so, which?
Hopefully you haven't simply dismissed the argument because you don't like the person putting it forward.
"The greatest wage effects are found for low-waged workers. Each 1% increase in the share of migrants in the UK-born working age population leads to a 0.6% decline in the wages of the 5% lowest paid workers and to an increase in the wages of higher paid workers." So there's flaw in his argument for starters