PaulC

Talent wise we should loose easily but we can hurt them with our pace.

very funny, the hip i think

that's pretty much the million Rand question imo ... anything to prove she was actually on the toilet probably gets him off as someone posted earlier , all they seem to be saying is her bladder was empty Which is consistent with her having a wee very shortly before she was killed. How long does a bladder remain empty after urinating? Particularly without drinking any more fluid. It could have been she went to the toilet an hour or two hours before and her bladder still remained empty,

Oh I forgot about that. The Germans have been such spoilers over the years of the beautiful game! Hungary 54, Holland 74 and France 82.

if it was Trevor Francis the other side of the door you would this is the bit I was trying to find out though ... was she actually using the toilet in which case it would suggest OP could be telling the truth ..or was the toilet bowl empty , suggesting that she had gone in there to hide All we have heard before is that she had an empty bladder

May have been born into wealth but he cared about the right people unlike Cameron and Osbourne. A man of conviction and a true lefty. He will be sadly missed RIP

No it had a window

nothing is ever certain though is it? I think he'd more likely to be convicted because its not a trail by jury. nothing is ever certain though is it? I think he's more likely to be convicted because its not a trail by jury.

which is a minimum of 25 years i think.

The prosecution have accepted that he didn't have his legs on when he shot through the door, what they are arguing is the fact that Pistorius claimed he put them on before he bashed through the door with the cricket bat but todays witness is claiming its very iikely that he didn't have his legs on. Still think the trial is in the balance myself. Its up to how the judge sees it and being a non white lady(Hope thats acceptable) well who knows what decision she will come to.

ok I hope not as like everybody else i think he's guilty as hell.

Far more damaging to the prosecution case though was the Dr's testimony that he heard a series of bangs, a scream, and then another series of bangs - backs up Oscar's story 100%. The evidence about legs or not is questionable... will be interesting to see if Pistorius himself shows how he hit the door and whether that tallies or not. Is it? Roux is certainly very good but that doesn't mean he didn't intentionally kill her. It was damming for the defence that his ex girlfriend said he had on two occasions woken her when he thought there was a burglar in the house. also the security guard ringing Pistorius after the shooting and he said everything was fine. There's other things like firing a gun in the restaurant and through the sunroof of a car. Ok Roux is doing his best at discrediting all the witnesses, but all these things are beginning to add up to a guilty verdict. not a chance in hell. He will be found not guilty of premeditated murder...there is evidence of enough doubt of that...but he get 10yeats for culpable homicide. But I thought its premeditated murder or nothing. In South African law you can not be charged for a lesser offence if found not guilty on the other one. So he will walk free if found not guilty

Far more damaging to the prosecution case though was the Dr's testimony that he heard a series of bangs, a scream, and then another series of bangs - backs up Oscar's story 100%. The evidence about legs or not is questionable... will be interesting to see if Pistorius himself shows how he hit the door and whether that tallies or not. Is it? Roux is certainly very good but that doesn't mean he didn't intentionally kill her. It was damming for the defence that his ex girlfriend said he had on two occasions woken her when he thought there was a burglar in the house. also the security guard ringing Pistorius after the shooting and he said everything was fine. There's other things like firing a gun in the restaurant and through the sunroof of a car. Ok Roux is doing his best at discrediting all the witnesses, but all these things are beginning to add up to a guilty verdict.

His brief in on the backfoot though with this new evidence about him not having his legs on when he smashed the door down. If can't disprove it then if Pistorius has lied about that then what else has he lied about.

I just hope we have a real go at them. The same team that played against Norwich apart from Bennett or Clark at LB

Looks ok but I think Bacuna can become a very good rb for us so wouldn't think theres much truth in the rumour.

Ramsey back for the Spurs game isn't he?

I don't know I think Luke Moore and Delfouneso could have been good enough but neither of them improved from their teens. Both probably had more talent than Gabby so ????

Sturridge does benefit from having Suarez alongside him though at club level, so its no wonder he's not as prolific at international level.

Sturridge by a distance

Rooney hasn't been fit for the last few major finals. Hopefully he will be fitter this time around. He's been a top player in the Premier League for a number of years and this will be his last world cup to impress really. To be honest i think England will struggle to get out of their group. Uruguay have Suarez and Cavani and Italy are always tough.

Rooney perhaps although he has been dissapointing for England.

Yes looks like Wenger will end his long run without a Trophy. After beating Spurs, Liverpool and Everton I thought they had their name on it anyway. Congratulatons to Wigan who are not giving up their trophy without a fight and all City will have to show for all the money they have spent is the capital one cup lol.

Maybe Bruce being a centre half helps. I always thought he was ok but Cahill was much better as he's proving now!

The thing with us we are capable on our day of beating anybody and also losing to anybody, so i wouldn't write off any game nor would expect to beat the teams at the bottom of the table.