Oh without a doubt he'd be in the all time Liverpool X1 Better than Keegan and Dalglish.
Dalglish is widely regarded as Liverpool's greatest ever player.
Kevin Keegan won the ballon d'Or. Twice.
Suarez is fantastic and I think he probably deserves to be included in the company of players mentioned already in this thread, but above them? Nah. Is he better than Ruud Van Nistelrooy? Teddy Sheringham? Michael Laudrup? Hristo Stoichkov? George Weah?
It's the thing where active players get over rated because they are here today and yesterdays heroes aren't. All that shit about Tiger Woods being the best golfer ever, he still hasn't taken Jack Nicklaus' record. It's the same with Suarez.
But was Keegan a great at Liverpool. 68 goals in 230 games. Suarez 67 in 106. Dalglish was a great at Liverpool but neither had the talent Suarez has. Sheringham? Ok i know its difficult to compare eras but if you mentioned George Best then yea i would agree with you.
It's impossible to compare eras. Keegan played in an era where fewer goals were scored. Why are we suddenly in an era where the best strikers are scoring a goal a game? Is it because everybody playing up front got better all of a sudden or is it because the laws of the game have changed to promote more attacking football? Offside is less strict that it ever has been, tackling has been all but removed from the game, the back pass rule stopped teams being able to kill games when they went a goal ahead. You can't just look at stats and say the guy with the biggest number is the best player. Is Suarez better than Dixie Dean?
As a whole I don't think theres more goals scored today. Its just Liverpool and Man City. I think we used to score more goals lol. Yes the pitches were far worse, not sure about offsides. Less tackllng yes. There was the 4 step rule with the goalkeepers. Don't know when the back pass rule came in? Football has changed so much. Dalglish has won more so he's better i guess. I just think Suarez has more talent.