Jump to content

PaulC

Established Member
  • Posts

    24,645
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by PaulC

  1. Murray lost 1640 pts in this event alone and drops to about 3000 pts... Just to show the difference. Djokovich is now on over 13000 pts and Nadal about 12,700. federer and Wawrinka are on just over 6000 pts...So the gap between the top 2 and the rest is massive.....and Djokovic can gain even more points on Nadal now because Nadal had a 100% record up until after the US Open....Murray has every opportunity to gain a lot of points from now until the end of the season. I think he will be back in the top 4 by the tour finals..
  2. Yes he didn't play after the US Open until The Australian open so he lost a load of points there and his atp tour event results have been poor.. Obviously the points dfference from quarters to winning is massive.
  3. It was and he won the US OPEN at a young age... Bad wrist injury though! Wawrinka has been dissapointing since the Aussie Open. Raonic is a bit of a one trick pony....Theres a couple of other young players like NishiKori and Dolgopolov who look pretty good
  4. Really you can make a case for all four teams... Brazil and Argentina have the support but Brazil losing their two best players will be a big factor I think. i make Argentina the slight favourites but hope Holland win it because they are overdue one and whilst I don't think this team is as good as some previous ones. The manager has turned them around and got them playing for each other unlike the euros and Robben must be the fittest player alive. Sneider is looking good again. If RVP can produce I think they can do it.
  5. Yes you never know. He strolled to the final. Theres only Dimitrov from the younger players I see as a slam winner next season. will Murray ever get back to where he was and will Nadal sacrifice a French so he can be 100% for Wimbledon...Onto the US Open and Djokovic will be brimming with confidence now..
  6. Yes he's done it........Great return of serving.... He would never have recovered if he had lost a match he should have had sewn up in the 4th set
  7. Did anybody real want Costa Rica in the semi's? We'd just have to endure another 90 minutes or so of defensive football. The world cup is about attacking exciting players. Messi vs Robben is much more interesting...
  8. Tuesday 8th July Brazil v Germany 0 - 2 Wednesday 9th July Netherlands v Argentina 1 - 1 Netherlands to win on pens.
  9. He was just trying to pysche them out... No harm in it. You get worse in cricket.
  10. He did ok tonight but was rather lucky to get away with a penalty
  11. Thats exactly it... Nice to cheer on the underdog, but an Aregntina v Costa Rica game wouldn't be very exciting
  12. Good for the tournament the Dutch won. Credit to Costa Rica but glad they didn't win..
  13. I wasn't aware he was still alive. Part of the great Real Madrid team with Puskas...
  14. Yes Holland will wear them down in the end
  15. They went long ball later in the game but for the most part they played too short for me....They are young side and will improve....
  16. As much as people hate Robben for diving he's by far the most exciting player to watch....Holland will win tonight but I hope they turn up against Argentina and Robben doesn't get kicked from pillar to post.
  17. Yes Holland. Argentina don't impress me at all....Yes they won but Belgium looked totally lacking in energy. I guess quarter final is good for a country of their size but with the collection of players they have they could have done better.....The big boys are in the last 4 so wouldn't be srprised if its a Brazil v Argentina final....
  18. The man who knows everything Lawro predicts a Belgium win. Thats good enough for me!
  19. I agree not any more but in 66, 70, 90, and 96 and we also had that Heskey inspired 5-1 thrashing against them...
×
×
  • Create New...

exclamation-mark-man-user-icon-with-png-and-vector-format-227727.png

Ad Blocker Detected

This site is paid for by ad revenue, please disable your ad blocking software for the site.

Â