I'm not a million miles away from that sentiment either tbh.
I think that's utterly laughable. If Sherwood keeps us up given the state we were in when he arrived he will have done an excellent job, Gil or no Gil.
If he fails then very little leeway will be given. Naturally.
What people seem unable to understand is that this is Tim Sherwood's job we are talking about here. He is under no obligation to give a **** what any of us want at this stage, he MUST do what he thinks is right. Even if he is proven wrong.
This is the burden a leader carries. Suck it up.
He will have done a good job turning us around, but I think most of us can agree out squad is much better than our current league position.
I don't think you can divide it that evenly... that he'll have done excellently if we stay up, but given little leeway if we drop.
This is more a personal thing to me. We aren't going to be winning anything for the next three or four years, probably much longer, and I like seeing players like Gil appear for Villa. Players who have a bit of ability and can actually play football. They make me enjoy it even if we lose matches. I don't rate Sherwood particularly highly, and I think we're a relatively decent attraction for a lot of managers, even moreso if we were to be taken over.
I am not saying I'd rather we play Gil, losing games 3-2, than play others and win 1-0 and stay up, obviously I'd prefer the wins. But here is the major point in my eyes: Gil is currently better than all of the alternatives who are ahead of him in the squad. N'Zogbia, Grealish, Cole, Weimann, Sinclair, he is simply a better player, so seeing them in the team when we are not opening up defences for fun doesn't add up (I am aware we scored seven past QPR and Sunderland A live wire would have been useful against Swansea/West Brom league game). Seeing Weimann and N'Zog on the bench and Gil in the stands is wrong.